Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T17:24:23.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Emperor Is Naked: Replies to commentaries on the target article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

Jelle Bruineberg
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia jelle.bruineberg@mq.edu.au
Krzysztof Dołęga
Affiliation:
Institut für Philosophie II, Fakultät für Philosophie und Erziehungswissenschaft, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany krzysztof.dolega@rub.de
Joe Dewhurst
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorieund Religionswissenschaft, Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80539 Munich, Germany joseph.e.dewhurst@gmail.com
Manuel Baltieri
Affiliation:
Araya, Inc., Tokyo, Japan manuel_baltieri@araya.org School of Engineering and Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK

Abstract

The 35 commentaries cover a wide range of topics and take many different stances on the issues explored by the target article. We have organised our response to the commentaries around three central questions: Are Friston blankets just Pearl blankets? What ontological and metaphysical commitments are implied by the use of Friston blankets? What kind of explanatory work are Friston blankets capable of? We conclude our reply with a short critical reflection on the indiscriminate use of both Markov blankets and the free energy principle.

Information

Type
Authors’ Response
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable