Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T14:09:47.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rationalization is a suboptimal defense mechanism associated with clinical and forensic problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Stuart Brody
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Charles University in Prague, Praha 1, Czech Republicstuartbrody@hotmail.comwww.DrStuartBrody.com
Rui Miguel Costa
Affiliation:
William James Center for Research, ISPA – Instituto Universitário, 1149-041Lisboa, Portugal. rcosta@ispa.pten.ispa.pt/faculty/rui-miguel-costa

Abstract

Cushman argues that “rationalization is rational.” We show that there is reasonable empirical clinical and forensic psychological evidence to support viewing rationalization as a quite suboptimal defense mechanism. Rationalization has been found to be associated not only with poorer emotional development, but also with a broad range of antisocial behavior, including not only shoplifting, but also pedophilia and murder.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable