Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T16:21:45.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shared Intentionality, joint commitment, and directed obligation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2020

Margaret Gilbert*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Irvine, CA92697-4555. mpgilber@uci.eduhttp://www.faculty.uci.edu/profile.cfm?faculty_id=5365

Abstract

Tomasello frequently refers to joint commitment, but does not fully characterize it. In earlier publications, I have offered a detailed account of joint commitment, tying it to a sense that the parties form a “we,” and arguing that it grounds directed obligations and rights. Here I outline my understanding of joint commitment and its normative impact.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable