Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multilingual Education
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multilingual Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Prologue
- Acknowledgement
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Content and Language Integrated Learning:
- Part III Teaching Academic Subjects through English Medium Instruction
- Part IV Dual Language Learning, Immersion Programmes, and Learner Agency
- 23 Dual Language Education in the USA
- 24 Dual Language Instruction in Africa
- 25 Helping Learners to Use All Their Languages to Learn Subjects in School
- 26 Child’s Language-Based Agency in Early Language Education
- 27 CLIL, Immersion, and Bilingual Education Programmes in Australia
- Part V Heritage Language Education
- Part VI Minority Language Education
- Part VII A Critical Look at Multilingual Pedagogies
- Index
- References
23 - Dual Language Education in the USA
from Part IV - Dual Language Learning, Immersion Programmes, and Learner Agency
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 December 2025
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multilingual Education
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multilingual Education
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Prologue
- Acknowledgement
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Content and Language Integrated Learning:
- Part III Teaching Academic Subjects through English Medium Instruction
- Part IV Dual Language Learning, Immersion Programmes, and Learner Agency
- 23 Dual Language Education in the USA
- 24 Dual Language Instruction in Africa
- 25 Helping Learners to Use All Their Languages to Learn Subjects in School
- 26 Child’s Language-Based Agency in Early Language Education
- 27 CLIL, Immersion, and Bilingual Education Programmes in Australia
- Part V Heritage Language Education
- Part VI Minority Language Education
- Part VII A Critical Look at Multilingual Pedagogies
- Index
- References
Summary
Despite the fact that bilingual instruction in the United States of America pre-dates its nationhood, educational policy has undulated its allowance and support for dual language education, marked by both selective preferential treatment of certain (primarily European) languages and through broad opposition to the endeavour as a whole. This brief review of the history and scholarship of dual language education in the USA recaps the ebbs and flows of bilingual education over time and the accompanying shifts in discourses about the purposes and benefits of bilingual education with subsequent implications for how bilingual education is implemented.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Multilingual Education , pp. 443 - 466Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025
References
Atkinson, D. (ed.) (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English Only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 27(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1998). Educating language-minority children. National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Baker, K., & de Kanter, A. (1981). Effectiveness of bilingual education: A review of the literature. Report to the US Department of Education. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Barik, H. C., & Swain, M. (1976). A longitudinal study of bilingual and cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology 11(4), 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilingual Education Act of 1968 Elementary and Secondary Act Amendments, Pub. L. No. 90–247, Title VII, §702, 81 Stat. 816. (1968).Google Scholar
Callahan, R., Gautsch, L., Hopkins, M., & Unda, M. D. (2022). Equity and state immigrant inclusivity: English learner education in ESSA. Education Policy 36(5), 1011–1053.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collier, V. P. & Thomas, W. P. (2017). Validating the power of bilingual schooling: Thirty-two years of large-scale, longitudinal research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 37, 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 33(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J. (1989). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice. Crane Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (1997). Best Evidence: Research Foundations of the Bilingual Education Act. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education Report. Washington DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED408858.pdf.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. ( 1999). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice, 4th ed. Bilingual Education Services.Google Scholar
Crawford, J. (2000). English-only vs. English-only. A tale of two initiatives: California and Arizona. www.languagepolicy.net/archives/203-227.htm.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Bilingualism in education: Aspects of theory, research and policy. Longman.Google Scholar
Danoff, M., Coles, G., McLaughlin, D., & Reynolds, D. (1978). Evaluation of the impact of ESEA Title VII Spanish/English bilingual education programs: Overview of study and findings. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes of Research (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 154 634).Google Scholar
De Onís, C. K. M. (2017). What’s in an ‘x’?: An exchange about the politics of ‘Latinx’. Chiricú Journal: Latina/o Literatures, Arts, and Cultures 1(2), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Valle, S. (2003). Language rights and the law in the United States: Finding our voices, 1st ed. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Department of Health, Education and Welfare (DHEW) (1970). Memorandum: Identification of Discrimination and Denial of Services on the Basis of National Origin (25 May). Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Washington DC. www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/lau1970.pdf.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal 100(1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1979). The efficacy of bilingual education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 1(5), 72–73.Google Scholar
Escamilla, K., Shannon, S., Carlos, S., & García, J. (2003). Breaking the code: Colorado’s defeat of the anti-bilingual education initiative (Amendment 31). Bilingual Research Journal 27(3), 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N. (2016). A tale of two visions: Hegemonic whiteness and bilingual education. Educational Policy 30(1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N., & García, O. (2017). Critical review of bilingual education in the United States: From basements and pride to boutiques and profit. Critical Review of Applied Linguistics 37, 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gándara, P., & Baca, G. (2008). NCLB and California’s English language learners: The perfect storm. Language Policy 7, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gándara, P., & Contreras, F. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policy. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gándara, P., & Escamilla, K. (2017). Bilingual education in the United States. In García, O., Lin, A. M. Y., & May, S. (eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education, 3rd ed. Springer International Publishing, pp. 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greene, J. P. (1998). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of bilingual education. Thomas Rivera Policy Institute.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y. (1994). Monolingual bias in SLA research. TESOL Quarterly 28(4), 795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, L. B. (2018). Interest convergence and hegemony in dual language: Bilingual education, but for whom and why? Language Policy 17, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kibbee, D. A. (2016). Language and the law: Linguistic inequality in America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1996). Under attack: The case against bilingual education. Language Education Associates.Google Scholar
Leung, C., & Valdés, G. (2019). Translanguaging and the transdisciplinary framework for language teaching and learning in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal 103(2), 348–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linton, A. (2004). Learning in two languages: Spanish–English immersion in U.S. public schools. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 24(7), 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, M. P. (2005). Reflections on educating Latino and Latina undocumented children: Beyond Plyler v. Doe. Seton Hall Law Review 35, 1373–1406.Google Scholar
Lucas, T., & Katz, A. (1994). Reframing the debate: The roles of native languages in English-Only programs for language minority students. TESOL Quarterly 28(3), 537–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (eds.) (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
May, S. (ed.) (2013). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, J. (2011). Represent and destroy: Rationalizing violence in the new racial capitalism. University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menken, K. (2009). No Child Left Behind and its effects on language policy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menken, K. (2017). High-stakes tests as de facto language education policies. In Shohamy, E., Or, I., & May, S. (eds.), Language testing and assessment, 3rd ed. Springer International Publishing, pp. 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 43 S. Ct. 625, 67 L. Ed. 1042 (1923).Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017). Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, D. K., Cervantes-Soon, C., Dorner, L., & Heiman, D. (2019). Bilingualism, biliteracy, biculturalism, and critical consciousness for all: Proposing a fourth fundamental goal for two-way dual language education. Theory into Practice 58(2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peal, E., & Lambert, W. E. (1962). The relation of bilingualism to intelligence. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 76(27), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmann, J. (1990). Historical legacies: 1840–1920. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 508(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, J. E. (2005). The conservative restoration and neoliberal defenses of bilingual education. Language Policy 4(4), 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, J. D., Yuen, S. D., Ramey, D. R., & Pasta, D. J. (1991). Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual programs for language-minority children. Final Report to the US Department of Education. Executive Summary and Vols. I and II, San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
Ricento, T. (2005). Problems with the ‘language‐as‐resource’ discourse in the promotion of heritage languages in the USA. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(3), 348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rolstad, K., Mahoney, K., & Glass, G. V. (2005). The big picture: A meta-analysis of program effectiveness research on English language learners. Educational Policy 19(4), 572–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Miguel, G. (2004). Contested policy: The rise and fall of federal bilingual education in the United States 1960–2001. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, O. (2002). Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American political discourse. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A. (2003). Effective reading programs for English Language Learners. A best-evidence synthesis. Report #66. Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED483006.pdf.Google Scholar
Subtirelu, N. C., Borowczyk, M., Thorson Hernández, R., & Venezia, F. (2019). Recognizing whose bilingualism? A critical policy analysis of the Seal of Biliteracy. The Modern Language Journal 103(2), 371–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sung, K. K. (2017). ‘Accentuate the positive; eliminate the negative’: Hegemonic interest convergence, racialization of Latino poverty, and the 1968 Bilingual Education Act. Peabody Journal of Education 92(3), 302–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. (1997). School effectiveness for language minority students. National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
Trujillo, A. (1996). In search of Aztlán: Movimiento ideology and the creation of a Chicano worldview through schooling. In Levinson, B., Foley, D., & Holland, D. (eds.), The cultural production of the educated person: Critical ethnographies of schooling and local practice. State University of New York Press, pp. 119–152.Google Scholar
Umansky, I. M., Valentino, R. A., & Reardon, S. F. (2016). The promise of two-language education. Educational Leadership 73(5), 10–17.Google Scholar
Valencia, R. R. (2012). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. (1997). Dual-language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review 67, 391–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. (2018). Analyzing the curricularization of language in two-way immersion education: Restating two cautionary notes. Bilingual Research Journal 41(4), 388–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. (2020). The future of the Seal of Biliteracy: Issues of equity and inclusion. In Heineke, A. J. & Davin, K. J. (eds.), The Seal of Biliteracy. Case studies and considerations for policy implementation. Information Age Publishing, pp. 175–201.Google Scholar
Valdés, G., Poza, L., & Brooks, M. D. (2015). Language acquisition in bilingual education. In Wright, W. E., Boun, S., & García, O. (eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés Fallis, G. (1977). Spanish language programs for Hispanic minorities: Current needs and priorities. In Fisher, D. (ed.), Minority language and literature. Modern Language Association. pp. 86–98.Google Scholar
Valdez, V., Freire, J., & Delavan, M. (2016). The gentrification of dual language education. The Urban Review 48, 601–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, T. G. (2014). Diversity, super-diversity, and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance? Review of Research in Education 38(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willig, A. C. (1985). A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research 55(3), 269–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this chapter is known to have missing or limited accessibility features.
We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is
not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions,
please contact
accessibility@cambridge.org.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.