Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T17:13:14.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The structure and function of bryophyte-dominated peatlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Bernard Goffinet
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
A. Jonathan Shaw
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Peatlands are unbalanced ecosystems where plant production exceeds decomposition of organic material. As a result, considerable quantities of organic material, or peat, accumulate over long periods of time: millennia. This organic material is composed primarily of plant fragments remaining after partial decomposition of the plants that at one time lived on the surface of the peatland. Decomposition occurs through the action of micro-organisms that have the ability to utilize dead plant components as sources of carbon for respiration (Thormann & Bayley 1997) in both the upper, aerobic peat column (the acrotelm) and the lower, anaerobic peat (the catotelm) (Ingram 1978, Clymo 1984, Wieder et al. 1990, Kuhry & Vitt 1996). Labile cell contents, cellulose, and hemicellulose are more readily available sources of carbon than recalcitrant fractions that contain lignin-like compounds, with these latter compounds being concentrated in peat by decomposition (Williams et al. 1998, Turetsky et al. 2000). The vascular plant-dominated, tree, shrub, and herb layers produce less biomass (Campbell et al. 2000) and decompose more readily than the bryophyte-dominated ground layer (Moore 1989). Surfaces of northern peatlands are almost always completely covered by a continuous mat of moss (National Wetlands Working Group 1988, Vitt 1990), and the large amount of biomass contained in this layer is composed of cell wall material that decomposes slowly. This slow decomposition, coupled with water-saturated, anaerobic conditions in the peat, cool climate, and a cool moist growing season conducive to bryophyte growth, allows organic matter to accumulate over large areas.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bryophyte Biology , pp. 357 - 392
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aerts, R., Wallen, B. & Malmer, N. (1992). Growth-limiting nutrients in Sphagnum-dominated bogs subject to low and high atmospheric nitrogen supply. Journal of Ecology, 80, 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, S. E. (1993). Mineralization of nitrogen in bogs and fens of western Canada. In Proceedings of the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography and the Society of Wetland Scientists Combined Annual Meetings, Edmonton, Alberta, p. 88. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Beilman, D. W., Vitt, D. H. & Halsey, L. A. (2001) Localized permafrost peatlands in western Canada: Definition, distributions, and degradation. Arctic and Antarctic Alpine Research, 33, 70–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belland, R. J. & Vitt, D. H. (1995). Bryophyte vegetation patterns along environmental gradients in continental bogs. Ecoscience, 2, 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benscoter, B. W. (2006). Post-fire bryophyte establishment in a continental bog. Journal of Vegetation Science, 17, 647–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benscoter, B. W. (2007). Post-fire compositional and functional recovery of boreal bogs. Ph.D. dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
Berendse, F., Breemen, N., Rydin, H.et al. (2001). Raised atmospheric CO2 levels and increased N deposition cause shifts in plant species composition and production in Sphagnum bogs. Global Change Biology, 7, 591–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, J. D. (1979). Physiological aspects of desiccation tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 30, 195–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, G. C., Showers, W., Cheseby, M.et al. (1997). A pervasive millennial-scale cycle in north Atlantic holocene and glacial climates. Science, 278, 1257–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, G. C., Showers, W., Elliot, M.et al. (1999). The North Atlantic's 1–2 kyr climate rhythm: Relation to Heinrich Events, Dansgaard/Oeschger Cycles and the Little Ice Age. Geophysical Monograph – American Geophysical Union, 112, 35–8.Google Scholar
Bragazza, L., Tahvanainen, T., Kutnar, L.et al. (2004). Nutritional constraints in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants under increasing atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe. New Phytologist, 163, 609–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgham, S. D., Updegraff, K. & Pastor, J. (1998). Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus mineralization in northern wetlands. Ecology, 79, 1545–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camill, P. (1999). Patterns of boreal permafrost peatland vegetation across environmental gradients sensitive to climate warming. Canadian Journal of Botany, 77, 721–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camill, P., Lynch, J. A., Clark, J. S., Adams, J. B. & Jordan, B. (2001). Changes in biomass, aboveground net primary production, and peat accumulation following permafrost thaw in the boreal peatlands of Manitoba, Canada. Ecosystems, 4, 461–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C., Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A.et al. (2000). Net primary production and standing biomass in northern continental wetlands. Northern Forestry Centre Information Report NOX -X-369. Ottawa: Canadian Forest Service, 57 pp.
Clymo, R. S. (1963). Ion exchange in Sphagnum and its relation to bog ecology. Annals of Botany, 27, 309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clymo, R. S. (1984). The limits of peat growth. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B303, 605–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damman, A. W. H. (1979). Geographic patterns in peatland development in eastern North America. In Classification of Peat and Peatlands, Proceedings of the International Peat Society Symposium, Hyytälä, Finland, ed Kivinen, E., Heikurainen, L. & Pakarinen, P., pp. 42–57. Helsinki: International Peat Society.Google Scholar
Davis, R. B. & Anderson, D. S. (1991). The eccentric bogs of Maine: a rare wetland type in the United States. Maine State Planning Office Critical Areas Program Planning Report 93.
DuReitz, G. E. (1949). Huvidenheter och huvidgranser i Svensk myrvegetation. (Summary: Main units and main limits in Swedish mire vegetation.) Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 43, 274–309.Google Scholar
Foster, D. R., King, G. A., Glaser, P. H. & Wright, Jr., (1983). Origin of string patterns in boreal peatlands. Nature, 306, 256–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gignac, L. D. (1994). Habitat limitations and ecotope structure of mire Sphagnum in western Canada. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Gignac, L. D. & Vitt, D. H. (1990). Habitat limitations of Sphagnum along climatic, chemical and physical gradients in mires of western Canada. Bryologist, 93, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gignac, L. D., Nicholson, B. J. & Bayley, S. E. (1998). The utilization of bryophytes in bioclimatic modeling: predicted northward migration of peatlands in the MacKenzie River basin, Canada, as a result of global warming. Bryologist, 101, 572–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, P. H. (1992a). Raised bogs in eastern North America – regional controls for species richness and floristic assemblages. Journal of Ecology, 64, 535–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, P. H. (1992b). Vegetation and water chemistry. In Patterned Peatlands of Northern Minnesota, ed. Wright, Jr. H. E. & Coffin, B. A., pp. 15–26. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, P. H. & Janssens, J. A. (1986). Raised bogs in eastern North America: transitions in landforms and gross stratigraphy. Canadian Journal of Botany, 64, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, P. H., Siegel, D. I., Reeve, S. I., Janssens, J. A. & Janecky, D. R. (2004). Tectonic drivers for vegetation patterning and landscape evolution in the Albany River region of the Hudson Bay Lowlands. Journal of Ecology, 92, 1054–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glime, J. M. & Vitt, D. H. (1984). The physiological adaptations of aquatic Musci. Lindbergia, 10, 41–52.Google Scholar
Gorham, E. (1956). The ionic composition of some bog and fen waters in the English lake district. Journal of Ecology, 44, 142–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorham, E. & Janssens, J. A. (1992). Concepts of fen and bog re-examined in relation to bryophyte cover and the acidity of surface waters. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 61, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, U. (2005). Global patterns of Sphagnum productivity. Journal of Bryology, 27, 267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, L. A., Vitt, D. H. & Zoltai, S. C. (1995). Disequilibrium response of permafrost in boreal continental western Canada to climate change. Climatic Change, 30, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, L. A., Vitt, D. H. & Trew, D. (1997a). Influence of peatlands on the acidity of lakes in northeastern Alberta, Canada. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 96, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, L. A., Vitt, D. H. & Zoltai, S. C. (1997b). Climatic and physiographic controls on wetland type and distribution in Manitoba, Canada. Wetlands, 17, 243–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halsey, L. A., Vitt, D. H. & Zoltai, S. C. (2000). The changing landscape of Canada's western boreal forest: the dynamics of permafrost. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 30, 283–7.Google Scholar
Hemond, H. F. (1980). Biogeochemistry of Thoreau's Bog, Concord, Massachusetts. Ecological Monographs, 50, 507–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, H. A. P. (1978). Soil layers in mires: function and terminology. Journal of Soil Science, 29, 224–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhry, P. & Vitt, D. H. (1996). Fossil carbon/nitrogen ratios as a measure of peat decomposition. Ecology, 77, 271–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhry, P., Nicholson, B. J., Gignac, L. D., Vitt, D. H. & Bayley, S. E. (1993). Development of Sphagnum-dominated peatlands in boreal continental Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 71, 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamers, L. P. M., Bobbink, R. & Roelofs, J. G. M. (2000). Natural nitrogen filter fails in raised bogs. Global Change Biology, 6, 583–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. & Vitt, D. H. (1994). The dynamics of moss establishment: temporal responses to nutrient gradients. Bryologist, 97, 357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. & Vitt, D. H. (1997). Patterns of retention and utilization of aerially deposited nitrogen in boreal peatlands. Ecoscience, 4, 106–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limpens, J. & Berendse, F. (2003). Growth reduction of Sphagnum magellanicum subjected to high nitrogen deposition: The role of amino acid nitrogen concentration. Oecologia, 135, 339–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limpens, J., Berendse, F. & Klees, H. (2003). N deposition affects N availability in interstitial water, growth of Sphagnum and invasion of vascular plants in bog vegetation. New Phytologist, 157, 339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limpens, J., Berendse, F. & Klees, H. (2004). How phosphorus availability affects the impact of nitrogen deposition on Sphagnum and vascular plants in bogs. Ecosystems, 7, 793–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmer, N. (1962). Studies of mire vegetation in the archaean area of southwestern Götaland (south Sweden). II. Distribution and seasonal variation in elementary constituents on some mire sites. Opera Botanica, 7, 1–67.Google Scholar
Malmer, N. (1986). Vegetational gradients in relation to environmental conditions in northwestern European mires. Canadian Journal of Botany, 82, 899–910.Google Scholar
Malmer, N., Horton, D. G. & Vitt, D. H. (1992). Elemental concentrations in mosses and surface waters of western Canadian mires relative to precipitation chemistry and hydrology. Ecography, 15, 114–28.Google Scholar
Mitch, W. J. & Gosselink, J. G. (1993). Wetlands, 2nd edn. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Moore, T. R. (1989). Plant production, decomposition, and carbon efflux in a subarctic patterned fen. Arctic and Alpine Research, 21, 156–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. R. & Basiliko, N. (2006). Decomposition in boreal peatlands. In Boreal Peatland Ecosystems, ed. Wieder, R. K. & Vitt, D. H., pp. 331–58. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
,National Wetlands Working Group (1988). Wetlands of Canada. Ecological Land Classification Series, No. 24. Ottawa, Ontario: Sustainable Development Branch, Environment Canada, and Montreal, Quebec: Polyscience Publications.
Nicholson, B., Gignac, L. D. & Bayley, S. E. (1996). Peatland distribution along a north-south transect in the MacKenzie River Basin in relation to climatic and environmental gradients. Vegetatio, 126, 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, M. C. & Lee, J. A. (1982). Nitrate reductase activity of Sphagnum species in the south Pennines. New Phytologist, 92, 487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, M. C., Woodin, S. J. & Lee, J. A. (1986). The potential importance of an increased atmospheric nitrogen supply to the growth of ombrotrophic Sphagnum species. New Phytologist, 103, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor, M. C. F. (1979). Structure and eco-physiological adaptation in bryophytes. In Bryophyte Systematics, ed. Clarke, G. C. S. & Duckett, J. G., pp. 479–509. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. C. F. (1984). Structure and ecological adaptation. In The Experimental Biology of Bryophytes, ed. Dyer, A. F. & Duckett, J. G., pp. 9–37. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. C. F., Oliver, M. J., Wood, A. J.et al. (2007). Desiccation tolerance in bryophytes: a review. Bryologist, 110, 595–621.CrossRef
Rasmussen, S., Wolff, C. & Rudolph, H. (1995). Compartmentalization of phenolic constituents in Sphagnum. Phytochemistry, 38, 35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, C. & Dainty, J. (1989). Ion behaviour in plant cell walls. I. Characterization of the Sphagnum russowii cell wall ion exchanger. Canadian Journal of Botany, 67, 451–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. D. & Moore, T. R. (2000). The influence of permafrost and fire upon carbon accumulation in high boreal peatlands, Northwest Territories, Canada. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research, 32, 155–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochefort, L. & Vitt, D. H. (1988). Effects of simulated acid rain on Tomenthypnum nitens and Scorpidium scorpioides in a rich fen. Bryologist, 91, 121–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochefort, L., Vitt, D. H. & Bayley, S. E. (1990). Growth, production and decomposition dynamics of Sphagnum under natural and experimentally acidified conditions. Ecology, 71, 1986–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydin, H. & McDonald, A. J. S. (1985). Tolerance of Sphagnum to water level. Journal of Bryology, 13, 571–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, D. I. & Glaser, P. H. (1987). Groundwater flow in a bog/fen complex, Lost River peatland, northern Minnesota. Journal of Ecology, 75, 743–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjörs, H. (1950). Regional studies in north Swedish mire vegetation. Botaniska Notiser, 1950, 174–221.Google Scholar
Sjörs, H. (1952). On the relation between vegetation and electrolytes in north Swedish mire waters. Oikos, 2, 242–58.Google Scholar
Slack, N. G., Vitt, D. H. & Horton, D. G. (1980). Vegetation gradients of minerotrophically rich fens in western Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany, 58, 330–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stålfelt, M. G. (1937). Der Gasaustausch der Moose. Planta, 27, 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thormann, M. N. & Bayley, S. E. (1997). Decomposition along a moderate-rich fen-marsh peatland gradient in Boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands, 17, 123–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thormann, M. N., Szumigalski, A. R. & Bayley, S. E. (1999). Aboveground peat and carbon accumulation potentials along a bog-fen-marsh peatland gradient in southern boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands, 19, 305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titus, J. E. & Wagner, D. J. (1984). Carbon balance for two Sphagnum mosses: Water balance resolves a physiological paradox. Ecology, 65, 1765–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turetsky, M. R. (2004). Decomposition and organic matter quality in continental peatland: the ghost of permafrost past. Ecosystems 7, 740–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turetsky, M. R., Wieder, R. K., Williams, C. & Vitt, D. H. (2000). Organic matter accumulation, peat chemistry, and permafrost melting in peatlands of boreal Alberta. Ecoscience, 7, 379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turetsky, M. R., Wieder, R. K., Halsey, L. & Vitt, D. H. (2002a). Current disturbance and the diminishing peatland carbon sink. Geophysical Research L 29(11)10.1029/2001GLO14000, 12 June 2002.
Turetsky, M. R., Wieder, R. K. & Vitt, D. H. (2002b). Boreal peatland C fluxes under varying permafrost regimes. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34, 907–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turetsky, M. R., Wieder, R. K., Vitt, D. H., Evans, R. J. & Scott, K. D. (2007). The disappearance of relict permafrost in boreal North America: effects on peatland carbon storage and fluxes. Global Change Biology, 13, 1922–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H. (1990). Growth and production dynamics of boreal mosses over climatic, chemical, and topographic gradients. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 104, 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H. (1994). An overview of factors that influence the development of Canadian peatlands. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 169, 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H. (2006). Functional characteristics and indicators of boreal peatlands. In Boreal Peatland Ecology, ed. Wieder, R. K. & Vitt, D. H., pp. 9–24. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H. & Chee, W. L. (1990). The relationships of vegetation to surface water chemistry and peat chemistry in fens of Alberta, Canada. Vegetatio, 89, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H. & Kuhry, P. (1992). Changes in moss-dominated wetland ecosystems. In Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, ed. Bates, J. W. & Farmer, A. M., pp. 178–210. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Achuff, P. & Andrus, R. E. (1975). The vegetation and chemical properties of patterned fens in the Swan Hills, north central Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany, 53, 2776–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Bayley, S. E. & Jin, T.-L. (1995a). Seasonal variation in water chemistry over a bog-rich fen gradient in continental western Canada. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 52, 587–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A. & Zoltai, S. C. (1994). The bog landforms of continental western Canada, relative to climate and permafrost patterns. Arctic and Alpine Research, 26, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A., Thormann, M. N. & Martin, T. (1995b). Peatland Inventory of Alberta. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Peat Task Force, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Horton, D. G., Slack, N. G. & Malmer, N. (1990). Sphagnum-dominated peatlands of the hyperoceanic British Columbia coast: patterns in surface water chemistry and vegetation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 696–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A., Wieder, K. & Turetsky, M. (2003). Response of Sphagnum fuscum to nitrogen deposition: A case study of ombrogenous peatlands in Alberta, Canada. Bryologist, 106, 235–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D. J. & Titus, J. E. (1984). Comparative desiccation tolerance of two Sphagnum mosses. Oecologia, 62, 182–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walbridge, M. R. & Navaratnam, J. A. (2006). Phosphorus in boreal peatlands. In Boreal Peatland Ecosystems, ed. Wieder, R. K. & Vitt, D. H., pp. 231–58. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, R. K. (2001). Past, present and future peatland carbon balance – an empirical model based on 210Pb-dated cores. Ecological Applications, 7, 321–36.Google Scholar
Wieder, R. W. (2006). Primary production in boreal peatlands. In Boreal Peatland Ecosystems, ed. Wieder, R. K. & Vitt, D. H., pp. 145–64. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, R. W., Scott, K. D., Kamminga, K.et al. (2009). Post-fire carbon balance recovery in boreal bogs of Alberta, Canada. Global Change Biology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, R. K. & Starr, S. T. (1998). Quantitative determination of organic fractions in highly organic, Sphagnum peat soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29, 847–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, R. K.Yavitt, J. B. & Lang, G. E. (1990). Methane production and sulphate reduction in two Appalachian peatlands. Biogeochemistry, 10, 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J., Yavitt, J. B., Wieder, R. K. & Cleavitt, N. L. (1998). Cupric oxidation products of northern peat and peat-forming plants. Canadian Journal of Botany, 76, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. A., Sawyer, J., Hatcher, P. G. & Lerch, H. E.. (1989). 1-3-5-hydroxybenzene structures in mosses. Phytochemistry, 28, 1395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. J. (2005). Eco-physiological adaptations to limited water environments. In Plant Abiotic Stress, ed. Jenks, M. A. & Hasegawaand, P. M., pp. 1–13. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Wood, A. J. (2007). Frontiers in Bryological and Lichenological Research. The nature and distribution of vegetative desiccation tolerance in hornworts, liverworts and mosses. Bryologist, 110, 163–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodin, S. J., Press, M. C. & Lee, J. A. (1985). Nitrate reductase activity in Sphagnum fuscum in relation to wet deposition of nitrate from the atmosphere. New Phytologist, 99, 381–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Z. C., Campbell, I. D., Campbell, C.et al. (2003a). Carbon sequestration in western Canadian peat highly sensitive to Holocene wet-dry climate cycles at millennial timescales. Holocene, 13, 801–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Z. C., Vitt, D. H., Campbell, I. D. & Apps, M. J. (2003b). Understanding Holocene peat accumulation pattern of continental fens in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81, 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoltai, S. C. & Vitt, D. H. (1990). Holocene climatic change and the distribution of peatlands in western interior Canada. Quaternary Research, 33, 231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoltai, S. C. & Vitt, D. H. (1995). Canadian wetlands: environmental gradients and classification. Vegetatio, 118, 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoltai, S. C., Siltanen, R. M. & Johnson, J. D. (1999). A wetland environmental data base. Canadian Forest Service NOX Publication Series. Edmonton, Alberta: Northern Forestry Centre.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×