To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 4 examines the parallel historical development of American and Nordic capitalism through key figures Henry Ford and N. F. S. Grundtvig. Through their contrasting approaches – Ford’s efficiency-driven industrial innovation versus Grundtvig’s democratic vision – the chapter illuminates how different historical paths shaped distinct varieties of capitalism. It traces how American capitalism evolved toward oligarchic concentration of power, while Nordic nations developed democratic institutions that dispersed power more broadly. The chapter explores critical historical periods including industrialization, the New Deal era, and modern developments, highlighting how initial choices and institutional arrangements influenced long-term outcomes. By examining these divergent historical trajectories, the chapter demonstrates how democratic foundations became essential to Nordic capitalism’s success while their absence increasingly challenges American capitalism.
Chapter 9 proposes a fundamental paradigm shift in American capitalism from a “Me-Me-Me” to a “Me-We-Me” mindset, drawing on insights from Nordic societies. Through personal cases of healthcare access and workplace safety, it demonstrates how American capitalism’s hyper-individualistic paradigm creates systemic harm, while Nordic capitalism’s balanced approach enables both individual freedom and collective well-being. Using Multilevel Selection theory, the chapter shows how societies that effectively balance competition with cooperation outperform those focused solely on individual self-interest. It argues that Nordic capitalism’s success stems not from rejecting individualism but from recognizing how collective action enhances individual freedom. The chapter concludes that addressing global sustainability challenges requires shifting from destructive hyper-individualism to a paradigm that enables effective cooperation while preserving individual initiative.
In independent Ireland, civil war threat receded in 1927 when Eamon de Valera led his anti-Treaty party, Fianna Fáil, into the Dáil, the lower, elected house of the Free State’s bicameral parliament. The pro-Treaty parties were Fine Gael and the Labour Party. Various short-lived parties challenged the supremacy of the Big Three over the decades. There was investment in infrastructure (electricity, transport, agriculture, food processing) and native industry flourished from the 1930s to the 1950s behind high tariff walls, but unemployment and emigration persisted. Health care was improved from the mid-1940s. The Catholic Church exercised huge power.
In Northern Ireland unionists’ majority led to systematic discrimination against Catholics (assumed nationalist) in elections, employment and housing. Economically, apart from the Second World War, Northern Ireland experienced decline but it shared in the social benefits of postwar Britain.
The 1960s brought more questioning of authority of all kinds, all over the island. In independent Ireland, new-found prosperity removed the safety-valve of emigration and free secondary education improved opportunities. Living standards rose. In the North, Catholic dissatisfaction was expressed in civil rights demonstrations which outraged unionists, and the British army was called in to maintain order.
This chapter introduces violence as a tension in education studies with iconoclasm and religious persecution as a guiding force in educational conformity. Moments of invasion, religious destruction, and dogmatic imposition, and foreign attacks on Mesoamerica’s multidimensional archives set a darker tone for the book. Weighty theories highlight violence and sudden change as hindering coherent local learning modalities. This is especially shown in discussions on place as a factor in power-knowledge construction and destruction, highlighting moments of ‘placebreaking’, or the direct assault on historic sites to remove community attachments, that Nahuas faced in military campaigns. Flexible, adaptive placemaking and ethnogenesis after a moment of placebreaking are offered as ways that newly Christian communities reconciled a history of violence. Regionally, it focuses on the religious and educational capital of the Puebla-Tlaxcala valley and the Temple of Quetzalcoatl. This was the earliest assault upon an example of a Mesoamerican learningscape, and this event is reframed to include differing Indigenous visions of destroying a place of learning. The thought is carried forward into the period of early Christianization, during which Motolinía is identified as an agent of compelled placebreaking but also a documentarian of the inability to complete the spiritual conquest.
Through the metaphor of Nordic strawberries (jordbær), this opening reflection introduces core themes of Nordic capitalism. The modest yet consistently high-quality berries serve as a symbol for Nordic societies’ approach to shared prosperity – not luxury for the few, but reliable well-being for the many. The reflection illustrates how thoughtful democratic design and efficient capitalism can create systems where good things are broadly accessible, which in aggregate produces something exceptional at the societal level, setting up the book’s exploration of Nordic capitalism’s distinctive features.
Dodona is among the best-known Greek oracles, with thousands of lead lamellae relating the questions asked to Zeus. But understanding how they were used, relying on epigraphy, with the literary tradition and its usual stereotypes about oracles, proves impossible. Literary sources emphasise the ambiguity of questions and answers, while the engraved questions, ignored by the literary tradition, are obviously formulated to be answered by ‘yes’ or ‘no’. From this basis, this essay explores when these questions (and the answers that we do not possess) were written and used in some ritual way(s). This could have been at the beginning or the end of the consultation, or somewhere in between. We do not know if the texts transpose the question asked orally verbatim, nor if all the consultants were following a strict procedure. Most of the questions are too short to be understood by the officials, and the consultation was partly if not fully oral. Some detours about quasi-identical questions, abecedaries and lot oracles clarify this picture, but this enquiry highlights our ignorance about the procedure and warns against simplistic interpretations drawn from incomplete documentation.
Ireland’s Jewish population experiences a hyphenated identity. At once insiders andoutsiders, and part of an ever-shrinking population, Irish Jews express a sense ofisolation and vulnerability, of being reduced to media stereotypes or expected toperform an essentialized Jewishness. Parallels between the Irish and the Jews arefamously drawn in Ulysses, echoing a trope found elsewhere in Irish writing,whereby the two peoples find a shared history of oppression, migration, and exile. Such affinity on the page does not necessarily translate to lived experience on theground, however. Today, Irish Jews express an awareness of being othered, afeeling of conditional acceptance within an official Irish narrative of tolerance, whichthey connect with Irish perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The voices ofthe Jewish community in Ireland tell us something about the problematics (andpossibilities) of an ambivalent identity, the site of ongoing formation and negotiation.
The number ratio of carbonaceous to ordinary chondrites (the CC/OC ratio) is mass dependent. It is somewhat high for large meteorites (0.20), very high for the largest fireball-producing meteoroids (30), low for most meteorite falls (0.04-0.05), and extremely high for micrometeorites (86) and interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) (>>100). The high CC/OC ratio among small particles reflects the predominance of C asteroids beyond 3 AU; these particles spiral into the Inner Solar System (and reach the Earth) via the Poynting-Robertson effect. The high CC/OC ratio among large objects results from the seasonal Yarkovsky effect, which transfers asteroids (mainly the abundant C asteroids from the Outer Solar System) into Near-Earth Asteroid (NEA) orbits.
Just as the purloined letter in Edgar Allan Poe's celebrated detective story was hidden in plain sight, so too can ordinary chondrites hold vital clues to the nature of the Solar System. Even highly weathered equilibrated samples, seemingly unworthy of a second look, may bear the markings of thermal metamorphism, shock metamorphism, and post-shock annealing. To study the heavens, we need only keep our eyes open; the rocks beneath our feet may conceal the secrets of the cosmos.
Chapter 6 examines how Nordic companies implement stakeholder cooperation to achieve superior sustainability outcomes. Through detailed case studies of companies like Rambøll, IKEA, Novo Nordisk, and Ørsted, it demonstrates how Nordic institutional structures and cultural norms enable effective stakeholder engagement. The chapter documents Nordic companies’ sustainability leadership, noting how Denmark-based firms have been recognized as the “World’s Most Sustainable Company” more than any other nation and Nordic based companies are disproportionately well represented in global sustainability rankings. It traces the theoretical foundations of Nordic stakeholder theory to Eric Rhenman’s pioneering work in the 1960s, contrasting this cooperative approach with American capitalism’s more competitive orientation. It also explores how enterprise foundation ownership, democratic governance structures, and cultural emphasis on cooperation create the “Nordic cooperative advantage.” The chapter concludes by arguing that realizing sustainable capitalism requires both structural foundations and cultural support for stakeholder cooperation, not just voluntary commitments.