This article argues that the late Soviet period saw a new form of Ukrainian nationhood emerge, one based less on ethno-historical commonalities than on territorial and institutional cohesion. Combining Michael Billig’s notion of “banal nationalism” with Alexei Yurchak’s analysis of “hypernormalized authoritative discourse,” it shows that Soviet Ukrainian leaders reproduced the assumption of Ukrainian nationhood even as they deprived it of concrete political and cultural content. While First Secretary Petro Shelest still promoted ethno-historical topoi alongside pride in Ukraine’s republican quasi-statehood, his successor Volodymyr Shcherbytsʹkyi preferred an image of Ukraine as a productive economic space free of ethnic specificity. Late Soviet Ukrainian banal nationalism left traces in everyday life, whether in sports reporting, school curricula, or in a specific visual language combining institutional emblems with politically empty ethnic symbols. During perestroika, late Soviet banal nationalism was appropriated and instrumentalized first by the national-democratic opposition, and later by “national communists.”

How does one prepare for flight? Is it possible to plan for such a disruptive event? This article explores a unique publication project established precisely for that purpose: migration manuals published by a German-Jewish organization to support the masses of Jews fleeing Nazi persecution in the 1930s. These manuals consolidated elaborate information from all over the world to prepare Jews for impending displacement. They encompassed not only essential details but also impressions, recommendations, and complaints. The manuals’ editors assembled reports from individuals already settled in refuge, generating a collaborative self-help effort on a global scale. Analyzing their content, this article shows that the process of guiding readers into forced migration extended in this case beyond technical migration procedures to include knowledge transfer about the politics of race, class, and gender, reflecting how German-Jewish refugees studied and situated themselves within these categories.

In this article BIALL President Claire Mazer reviews the findings of the BIALL/SLS Academic Law Library Survey, which was conducted in 2024 and covered the academic year 2022/23. Claire’s article provides some analysis of the responses, while it also outlines some key themes and trends. The author would like to thank Laura Griffiths and Marilyn Clarke at IALS for their work in conducting the survey on behalf of BIALL and SLS (Society of Legal Scholars).

Ce texte propose une analyse du succès éditorial et intellectuel des récits contemporains du vivant. En s’appuyant sur les figures de Vinciane Despret et de Baptiste Morizot, il interroge les conditions sociales, historiques et épistémologiques d’une littérature qui prétend dépasser le dualisme nature/culture et établir un « vivre-ensemble inter-espèces » à l’ère de l’Anthropocène. Un retour sur les traditions critiques de l’exceptionnalisme humain montre que ces récits, bien qu’animés par une volonté de reconnexion sensible au vivant, tendent à reproduire des formes d’anthropomorphisme et à universaliser des dispositions socialement situées, propres aux groupes dotés d’un fort capital culturel. L’ontologie des sensibilités qu’ils tentent de développer contribue paradoxalement à légitimer certains usages marchands et institutionnels de l’écologie contemporaine.

This article critically examines the inequities in the access to COVID-19 vaccine and the lessons for global health law. Despite the rapid development and approval of COVID-19 vaccines, the rollout exposed severe systemic failures rooted in preexisting economic distortions and market inefficiencies. The article argues that addressing vaccine inequity requires more than improved distribution and solidarity, but effective reinvention of the global vaccine supply chain through evidence-based and meaningful market-shaping measures. It calls for a transformative approach to global health governance, emphasising the need for a comprehensive, human rights-compliant policy framework to correct structural problems in international markets, moving beyond superficial exhortations to equity.

This commentary analyzes the recent attacks on adolescents’ access to contraception by religious and parental rights activists and the conservative legal movement. Specifically, we focus on Deanda v. Becerra, a 2024 case in which the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a Texas state law requiring parental consent for minors to access contraception is not preempted by a longstanding policy under Title X of the federal Public Health Service Act that prohibits clinics receiving federal funding from requiring parental consent or notification. We first describe existing laws governing minors’ confidential access to reproductive health care, including the federal constitutional framework for parental rights, state parental notification and consent laws, and Title X, the federal law that provides federal funds to reproductive health care clinics for low-income people. We then examine and critique the Federal District Court ruling in Deanda, which elevated individual religious and parental rights over public health concerns, and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in that case, which undermined federal public health authority and jeopardized access to reproductive health care for low-income adolescents. Finally, we assess the public health and reproductive rights implications of restricted access to reproductive health care for minors and consider possible future directions and advocacy opportunities for reproductive, public health and legal advocates to promote continued access to contraception for adolescents despite mounting legal challenges.

Two new species, Placomaronea fruticosa and P. placoidea, are described. They were originally discovered in the southern Peruvian Andes at altitudes between 3000 and 4650 m. One specimen of P. fruticosa was subsequently also found among herbarium material collected in Argentina. Placomaronea fruticosa is terricolous in high altitude grasslands with rocky cliffs. It is characterized by its fruticose to subfruticose thallus, which is up to 8 mm tall and partially immersed in the substrate, its branches are bright to deep yellow, flattened and on the substrate surface their elongated apices resemble placodioid lobes of crustose species in the genus Candelina, whereas the cylindrical basal parts are pale beige to deep violet and mostly grow immersed in their substrate. The species has asci with over 20 ascospores in a 60–80 μm tall hymenium. Placomaronea placoidea is a saxicolous species, growing in rocky exposed areas. It is characterized by its tightly adnate, foliose, placodioid thallus with a bright to deep yellow upper surface. No fertile specimens were found. Both species newly described here are morphologically very similar to species of Candelina but are clearly distinguished by a cortex anatomy characteristic of Placomaronea. Cortex anatomy can thus be immensely useful to distinguish crustose and subfoliose genera in Candelariaceae, whereas secondary chemistry is shown to be quite uniform, with some chemotype variation of little taxonomic relevance. An updated ITS-only phylogeny of Candelariaceae is presented and compared with earlier phylogenies of the family. Several well-supported clades are identified, including Candelina, Placomaronea and Protocandelariella, but much of Candelaria and Candelariella s. lat. remain unresolved, and the relationships between the supported clades are not yet known. The limitations of currently available molecular data, primarily only ITS, are discussed, particularly in relation to the lack of support at species level, such as the two newly described species of Placomaronea. An updated key to currently accepted genera in Candelariaceae and all species of Placomaronea now known is provided.

A Spanish version of this abstract is provided in Supplementary Material File S1 (available online).

Sociolegal scholars have long debated the effectiveness of legal mobilization as a strategy for achieving social change. In addition to evaluating outcomes of wins and losses in court, they have identified several indirect effects of legal mobilization on social movements. Mobilizing new rights concepts can increase support for a movement, divide its base, and create new political allies or opponents. A win in court might lead to rights being institutionalized but not enforced, and it can serve to demobilize a movement base. This article contributes to this body of literature by arguing that movement groups can strategically mobilize the law to engage in co-optation from below – learning about an agency in order to build more effective organizing strategies. Using data gathered as a participant ethnographer in a grassroots environmental justice organization, I show how organizers used meetings with state regulators to learn how the agency interprets and enforces environmental laws and adjust their tactics in response. This study also demonstrates the value of conducting in-depth studies of local legal contests even as we seek to understand the role of the law in navigating our most pressing global challenges.