To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although there are several evidence-based treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), up to half of patients do not experience significant symptom relief. Executive functioning (EF) impairment is believed to impede PTSD recovery and diminish treatment response, but is not directly targeted by traditional treatments. Cognitive training for EF has emerged as a promising treatment alternative for PTSD, but may only benefit certain patients. The present study aimed to identify, validate, and characterize the subgroup of patients with PTSD who respond to an EF training program.
Methods
Veterans with PTSD (N = 79) completed neuropsychological tests and a working memory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning, followed by 16 sessions of an EF training program (working memory training [WMT]). Growth mixture modeling identified subgroups based on session-by-session working memory changes. Mixed-effects models then evaluated differences in spatial working memory and PTSD symptom improvement among these subgroups. Finally, the subgroups were compared on baseline neuropsychological performance and neural activity.
Results
Three subgroups were extracted, with one subgroup (labeled low-WM/steep improvement subgroup) exhibiting steeper working memory improvement across training and greater spatial working memory and PTSD symptom improvement following training. The low-WM/steep improvement subgroup was uniquely characterized by a combination of lower EF task performance and lower working memory-related neural activity at baseline.
Conclusions
WMT may be a promising alternative PTSD treatment for Veterans with EF impairments. Patients likely to benefit from WMT could be identified using a combination of neuropsychological and neuroimaging assessments, but further research is needed to confirm these indicators.
The connection between working memory (WM) and the breadth of vocabulary knowledge (BVK) in foreign language young learners remains underexplored, particularly with respect to how these constructs co-develop across the primary school years. Although growth in WM has been linked to early gains in BVK, the directionality and temporal dynamics of their association are not well understood. Utilizing a cross-lagged panel design, this study tracked the development of WM and BVK in 158 young learners from grade 1 to grade 5. Results unveiled lagged associations between WM and BVK, suggesting that working memory serves as a valuable indicator for future BVK acquisition, while also indicating that accumulated BVK may, in turn, exert an influence on WM. These findings highlight a complex, bi-directional relationship between WM and BVK throughout primary school students’ formative years, in line with the transactional model.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has revealed inconsistent neural activity patterns in major depressive disorder (MDD) across cognitive and affective domains, and this study used an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to examine brain function abnormalities in working memory, reward processing, and emotion processing.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and CNKI for fMRI studies comparing MDD patients with healthy controls (HCs), including data up to 3 December 2024. ALE meta-analysis was performed to examine activation patterns. Jackknife sensitivity analysis, risk of bias, and Newcastle–Ottawa scale were used to assess robustness and publication bias. Meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the impact of covariates on the results.
Results
Sixty-nine studies (2,073 MDD individuals and 2,009 HCs) were included. MDD individuals showed hyperactivation in the bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, subcallosal gyrus, lentiform nucleus, left claustrum, insula, and anterior cingulate cortex, alongside hypoactivation in the right lentiform nucleus, parahippocampal gyrus, fusiform gyrus, and other regions. Domain-specific analyses revealed working memory-related hyperactivation in the right middle and superior frontal gyrus, reward-related hyperactivation in the bilateral lentiform nucleus, right claustrum, and left caudate, and emotion-related hyperactivation in the bilateral parahippocampal gyrus, bilateral lentiform nucleus, right subcallosal gyrus, right anterior cingulate cortex, and left claustrum. Jackknife sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, with no significant publication bias or covariate impact.
Conclusions
Aberrant activation in the lentiform and caudate nuclei across reward and emotion tasks suggests striatal dysfunction plays a key role in emotion-motivation interplay, highlighting the striatum as a potential target for future therapies.
Object relatives (ORs) have been reported to cause heavier processing loads than subject relatives (SRs) in both pre- and postnominal position (prenominal relatives: Miyamoto & Nakamura 2003, Kwon 2008, Ueno & Garnsey 2008; postnominal relatives: King & Just 1991, King & Kutas 1995, Traxler et al. 2002). In this article, we report the results of two eye-tracking studies of Korean prenominal relative clauses that confirm a processing advantage for subject relatives both with and without supporting context. These results are shown to be compatible with accounts involving the accessibility hierarchy (Keenan & Comrie 1977), phrase-structural complexity (O'Grady 1997), and probabilistic structural disambiguation (Mitchell et al. 1995, Hale 2006), partially compatible with similarity-based interference (Gordon et al. 2001), but incompatible with linear/temporal analyses of filler-gap dependencies (Gibson 1998, 2000, Lewis & Vasishth 2005, Lewis et al. 2006).
The source of syntactic island effects has been a topic of considerable debate within linguistics and psycholinguistics. Explanations fall into three basic categories: grammatical theories, which posit specific grammatical constraints that exclude extraction from islands; grounded theories, which posit grammaticized constraints that have arisen to adapt to constraints on learning or parsing; and reductionist theories, which analyze island effects as emergent consequences of non-grammatical constraints on the sentence parser, such as limited processing resources. In this article we present two studies designed to test a fundamental prediction of one of the most prominent reductionist theories: that the strength of island effects should vary across speakers as a function of individual differences in processing resources. We tested over three hundred native speakers of English on four different island-effect types (whether, complex NP, subject, and adjunct islands) using two different acceptability rating tasks (seven-point scale and magnitude estimation) and two different measures of working-memory capacity (serial recall and n-back). We find no evidence of a relationship between working-memory capacity and island effects using a variety of statistical analysis techniques, including resampling simulations. These results suggest that island effects are more likely to be due to grammatical constraints or grounded grammaticized constraints than to limited processing resources.
This article is a crosslinguistic investigation of the hypothesis that the average information rate conveyed during speech communication results from a trade-off between average information density and speech rate. The study, based on seven languages, shows a negative correlation between density and rate, indicating the existence of several encoding strategies. However, these strategies do not necessarily lead to a constant information rate. These results are further investigated in relation to the notion of syllabic complexity.
Sprouse, Wagers, and Phillips (2012) carried out two experiments in which they measured individual differences in memory to test processing accounts of island effects. They found that these individual differences failed to predict the magnitude of island effects, and they construe these findings as counterevidence to processing-based accounts of island effects. Here, we take up several problems with their methods, their findings, and their conclusions.
First, the arguments against processing accounts are based on null results using tasks that may be ineffective or inappropriate measures of working memory (the n-back and serial-recall tasks). The authors provide no evidence that these two measures predict judgments for other constructions that are difficult to process and yet are clearly grammatical. They assume that other measures of working memory would have yielded the same result, but provide no justification that they should. We further show that whether a working-memory measure relates to judgments of grammatical, hard-to-process sentences depends on how difficult the sentences are. In this light, the stimuli used by the authors present processing difficulties other than the island violations under investigation and may have been particularly hard to process. Second, the Sprouse et al. results are statistically in line with the hypothesis that island sensitivity varies with working memory. Three out of the four island types in their experiment 1 show a significant relation between memory scores and island sensitivity, but the authors discount these findings on the grounds that the variance accounted for is too small to have much import. This interpretation, however, runs counter to standard practices in linguistics, psycholinguistics, and psychology.
Simultaneous interpreting (SI), a challenging task enabled by bilingualism, is claimed to distinctly tax working memory (WM). However, causal designs are missing, limiting our understanding of the phenomenon. We recruited 50 Chinese-English bilinguals and assessed their WM performance (alongside inhibitory and fluency outcomes) before and after L1–L2 SI or a control task (text comprehension). WM scores (especially under high-demand, multimodal conditions) increased after text comprehension but not after SI, adjusting for age of L2 appropriation, years of L2 use, L2 proficiency and SI competence. Of note, WM was assessed immediately before and after SI, ruling out other cognitive influences. Conversely, no distinct patterns were observed on inhibitory or fluency tasks. Briefly, this activity seems to hinder practice-related WM gains – a finding that expands contemporary accounts of interpreting.
Thai researchers developed a new self-report measure of executive functions for adolescents based on Diamond’s framework (the Behavioral Inventory Measure of Executive Functions [BIMEFs]). How it was developed, its psychometric properties, and norms by sex and age are reported here.
Method:
An independent panel of experts evaluated the content validity of BIMEFs. Reliability was checked using Cronbach’s alpha with a sample of 45 secondary students. 1,865 students, ages 12 – 18 years (65% female) from across Thailand participated in the normative study.
Results:
The BIMEFs consists of 42 items that assess inhibitory control (IC), working memory (WM), and cognitive flexibility (CF), including eight subcomponents. For all items, the index of item-objective congruence was >0.5 and Cronbach’s alpha was >0.7. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed the adjusted goodness of fit index to be 0.9. The strongest sex difference was for IC. Students of 13 years scored lower on EFs overall, IC, WM, CF, and all subcomponents than older students. Self-control, verbal working memory, and being able to change perspectives showed the most pronounced differences by age.
Conclusion:
The BIMEFs, which is designed to be culturally-appropriate for Thailand and cross-culturally generally, is the first EF questionnaire based on Diamond’s framework. It shows good psychometric properties and sensitivity to age and sex differences. It indicates that IC development, at least in Thailand, plateaus earlier than WM and CF and that CF shows a more protracted development during adolescence than IC or WM.
Deficits in working memory (WM) and attention have a considerable functional impact on people with bipolar disorder (PBD). Understanding the neurocognitive underpinnings of these cognitive constructs might facilitate the discovery of more effective pro-cognitive interventions. Therefore, we employed a paradigm designed for jointly studying attentional control and WM encoding.
Methods
We used a visuospatial change-detection task using four Gabor Patches with differing orientations in 63 euthymic PBD and 76 healthy controls (HCS), which investigated attentional competition during WM encoding. To manipulate bottom-up attention using stimulus salience, two Gabor patches flickered, which were designated as either targets or distractors. To manipulate top-down attention, the Gabor patches were preceded by either a predictive or a non-predictive cue for the target locations.
Results
Across all task conditions, PBD stored significantly less information in visual WM than HCS (significant effect of group). However, we observed no significant group-by-salience or group-by-cue interactions. This indicates that impaired WM was not caused by deficits in attentional control.
Conclusions
While WM was disturbed in PBD, attentional prioritization of salient targets and distractors, as well as the utilization of external top-down cues, were not compromised. Thus, the control of attentional selection appears to be intact at least for our specific manipulation of this cognitive construct. These findings provide valuable clues for models of WM dysfunction in PBD by suggesting that later stages of WM encoding, such as WM consolidation, are likely primarily impaired, while selective attention is not a main source of impairment.
This study investigated L2 learners’ interpretation of quantifier scope, focusing on the influence of individual differences, including L2 proficiency, working memory (WM) and inhibitory control (IC). A picture selection task using the covered-box paradigm (CBP) was conducted with 70 Chinese-speaking learners of English and a control group of 40 native English speakers. The results revealed that inverse scope (IS) posed particular challenges for L2 learners, leading to reduced, non-target-like access. We attribute this difficulty to factors such as negative L1 transfer, limited L2 input and increased processing demands associated with IS compared to surface scope (SS). More importantly, WM and IC significantly influenced L2 learners’ interpretation patterns, with their effects mediated by L2 proficiency. We also observed individual variation in scope interpretations among native speakers, particularly with negatively quantified (NQ) sentences. This variation provides valuable evidence of individual differences in native speakers’ grammatical knowledge and was partly driven by cognitive factors. Altogether, the findings contribute novel evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific mechanisms underlying quantifier scope interpretation in L2 learners as well as in native speakers.
In ADHD a common obstacle of academic success is impaired reading comprehension. Impaired comprehension in ADHD is accompanied by altered eye movements during reading as well as more general eye movement deficits associated with non-verbal stimuli. This suggests that the reading deficits do not cause the eye movement impairment. Instead, eye movements might contribute to reading comprehension difficulties.
Methods:
We tested whether minimizing the need for eye movements during reading aids comprehension. We measured reading comprehension in a sample of undergraduate students with and without ADHD. Students read short paragraphs using normal text reading with all words fully visible (FULL), PACED reading that preserved text layout with one word at a time appearing at its usual location in the text, and reading with minimal eye movements in which one word at a time appeared in the center of the screen in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP).
Results:
ADHD participants performed better in the RSVP condition relative to the other two reading conditions that required eye movements, and they benefited from the RSVP condition requiring minimal eye movements by almost 13% relative to neurotypical controls, who showed comprehension difficulties using the RSVP mode.
Conclusions:
Minimizing eye movement boosted reading comprehension in the ADHD suggesting that eye movements are implicated in reading processes in ADHD, an interference that can be avoided in the RSVP reading condition. Future work should explore the possibility of RSVP as a reading aid in ADHD adults and potentially school-aged children.
Memory is vital for a range of brain functions, not just decision-making. Memory is a complex concept, that many researchers have attempted to model and explain over the course of history, all with their own properties. It is commonly accepted however that memory must include both retention and retrieval. Human memory can be considered as a complex storage system, in which information can be stored and accessed according to different criteria. Various models have explained memory organisation in terms of duration of retention (fractation), information type and temporal direction. To gain an insight into how memory informs decision-making, we must consider it as a dynamic cognitive function, with three main stages: encoding, storage and retrieval.
The elementary but necessary observation is made that memory is required to perceive events in time in relation to each other. The implication is that some type of forgetting must be involved when events fail to form a relation and are perceived as just being one thing happening after another. Memory and forgetting are first examined in terms of traditional psychological metaphor, that memories are contained within memory buffers. While Gestalt certainly involves memory, it does not seem to operate in terms of stored memories. A larger conception of memory is required, and this is provided by examining physical systems that embody memory without encoding or storing anything. Several examples of both deterministic and stochastic physical systems that embody memory are offered that broaden the scope of what can be a memory system.
Variability in ultimate learning outcomes is a conspicuous trait of second language (L2) acquisition. After enumerating well-studied conditioning factors in L2 attainment, the present chapter identifies five for particular attention: working memory, attitudes, music background, genetic makeup, and age of acquisition. Along with detailing the factors’ individual roles in L2 attainment, we demonstrate inter-relationships between them. For example, the aptitude factor of working memory ability is subject to genetic variation and may decline over age of L2 learning. We examine variable outcomes from two distinct perspectives: magnitude (i.e., how the identified factors contribute to higher or lower levels of L2 attainment) and dispersion (i.e., how the factors contribute to greater or lesser variability of L2 attainment). Notably, later ages of L2 learning are associated with both lower L2 attainment levels and greater L2 attainment variability. In this vein, we consider the possibility that magnitudes and variability of L2 outcomes over age of learning may be isomorphic with working memory levels and dispersion over the lifespan. In addition, we underscore the transitory nature of individual-level L2 outcomes, which are subject to destabilization following shifts of dominance between the L1 (first language) and the L2.
Music & spoken language share many features by combining smaller units (e.g., words, notes) into larger structures (e.g., sentences, musical phrases). This hierarchical organization of sound is culturally contingent & communicates meaning to listeners. Comparisons of music & language from a cognitive neuroscience perspective provide several insights into commonalities & differences between these systems, how they are represented in the brain. The cognitive neuroscience research of music & language, emphasizes the pitfalls & promises identified, including (1) the apparent acoustic & structural similarities between these systems, (2) how both systems convey meaning to listeners, (3) how these systems are learned over the course of development, & (4) the ways in which experience in one domain influences processing in the other domain. We conclude that searching for similarities in how these complex systems are structured (e.g., comparing musical syntax to linguistic syntax) represents a pitfall that researchers should approach with caution. A promising approach in this area of research is to examine how general cognitive mechanisms underlie the learning & maintenance of both systems
An active area of research in psycholinguistics concerns the cognitive mechanisms that are used to form syntactic dependencies in real-time sentence processing. Comprehenders make skilled use of working-memory resources to incrementally store and update syntactic structures (backward dependency formation) and use fine-grained probabilistic knowledge to anticipate the ways in which syntactic dependencies will eventually be resolved (forward dependency formation). While this broad picture is generally acknowledged, exactly how these processes play out in typologically diverse languages remains underexplored. In this chapter, we describe the various ways in which different grammatical systems pose diverse challenges for this general picture of sentence processing and present experimental research that addresses how core processes of backward and forward dependency play out in typologically diverse contexts. We argue that comparative sentence processing research presents evidence for shared cognitive mechanisms used for dependency formation across languages, but also points to several ways in which current theories need to be expanded to capture cross-linguistic variation.
Chapter 14 presents the third application of MATLAB to behavioral sciences: conducting computerized experiments. Students learn basic experimental design before applying their programming knowledge from Chapters 1 to 11 to develop three experiments: the Flanker and N-Back tasks, and the Monty Hall probability puzzle. In the final, longest section of this chapter, students learn how to use the MATLAB add-on Psychtoolbox, which allows full control of and interaction with the screen, keyboard, mouse, and audio systems. The three experiments from earlier in the chapter are extended to incorporate Psychtoolbox functionality, and a new experiment, the Stroop task, concludes the chapter.
Obstetric complications (OCs) are associated with cognitive and brain abnormalities observed in patients with schizophrenia. Gyrification, a measure of cortical integrity sensitive to events occurring during the prenatal and perinatal periods, is also altered in first-episode psychosis (FEP). We examined the relationship between OCs and gyrification in FEP, as well as whether gyrification mediates the relationship between OCs and cognition.
Methods
We examined differences in the Local Gyrification Index (LGI) for the frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and cingulate cortices between 139 FEP patients and 125 healthy controls (HCs). Regression analyses explored whether OCs and diagnosis interact to explain LGI variation. Parametric mediation analyses were conducted to assess the effect of LGI on the relationship between OCs and cognition for FEP and HC.
Results
Significant LGI differences were observed between FEP patients and HC in the left parietal and bilateral cingulate and occipital cortices. There was a significant interaction between OCs and diagnosis on the left cingulate cortex (LCC) that was specific to males (p = 0.04) and was driven by gestational rather than intrauterine OCs.
In HCs, OCs had a direct effect on working memory (WM) (p = 0.048) in the mediation analysis, whereas in FEP, we observed no significant effect of OCs on either verbal or WM.
Conclusions
OCs interact with diagnosis to predict LCC gyrification, such that males with FEP exposed to OCs exhibit the lowest LGI. OCs influence WM, and LCC gyrification may mediate this relation only in HC, suggesting a differential neurodevelopmental process in psychosis.
This paper reports a study that investigated how first language (L1) reading comprehension, L1 low-level skills, working memory capacity, and reading anxiety are related to the accuracy of responses and completion time in a second language (L2) reading test. The data obtained from Hungarian secondary school learners of English showed that anxiety related to processing the L2 reading text, time pressure, and the response tasks as well as L1 reading comprehension scores and backward digit span were significant predictors of L2 reading scores. L1 low-level skills did not contribute significantly to L2 reading accuracy. Higher levels of reading-related anxiety were associated with slower reading, and L2 learners with concurrently lower levels of L1 and L2 reading ability needed more time to complete the reading test. These findings highlight that L2 reading tests should be flexibly timed so that everyone, including test takers with literacy-related difficulties such as dyslexia, can demonstrate their abilities.