To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
People with eating disorders can find the experience of social eating difficult, and being able to eat socially can be an important part of recovery. In the context of mental health treatment, experiences of mastery within virtual reality (VR) can be transferred to real life, and previous qualitative research has identified that a VR café environment could be a useful treatment adjunct for people with eating disorders. The aim of this project was to develop a VR café intervention for people with eating disorders who find social eating challenging.
Methods:
We used the Person-Based Approach to develop the VR café. In Study 1 we conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups with young people with personal experience of a range of different eating disorders (n=15), parents and carers (n=4), and clinicians from a variety of professional backgrounds (n=6), to inform the design of the intervention. In Study 2, the café was further developed through a series of development activities and think aloud interviews with people with experience of eating disorders (n=12).
Results:
Study 1 participants described a range of challenges associated with cafés, which were incorporated into the initial build of the VR café by our industry partners,Virtual Bodyworks (Kiin). These included challenges related to social interactions with café staff, the busyness of café settings, and around choosing and ordering food and drink from café menus. Study 2 participants further shaped the intervention, contributing to the scripts for VR café staff; helping to develop food and drink menus; providing feedback on measures for assessing the effectiveness of the intervention; and advising on the ways clinicians could helpfully support people using the VR café, including through the provision of feedback on a written guidance document. During think-aloud interviews, Study 2 participants also identified areas for improvement to the content and experience of the VR café.
Conclusion:
By placing the perspectives and ideas of people with eating disorders at the heart of the design of the VR café, we have developed a safe space for people with diverse eating disorders to practice relevant challenges related to social eating whilst being supported by a clinician. The intervention aims to reduce anxiety, increase confidence, and improve tolerance of uncertainty around social eating settings, and will be offered to young people accessing eating disorder treatment in two participating NHS trusts, as part of a mixed methods feasibility trial.
The Mental Health Intensive Support Team at Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust commissioned a bespoke, 8-day training programme centred on the principles and delivery of dialogical practice, informed by an Open Dialogue approach. The training was commissioned to support the embedding of these principles into the rehabilitative model of care, with consideration being given to how to adapt the approach to the clinical model.
The aim was to evaluate the experiences of the clinical staff participating in the training that was delivered between April 2025 and November 2025, across two training cohorts.
Methods:
The training package was offered to clinical staff of all bandings who had not previously completed any formal training in Open Dialogue or dialogical practice.
Data was collected via questionnaires that were completed at key points throughout the training. A pre-training questionnaire was completed prior to starting the 8-day training programme, and a post-training questionnaire after each of the four 2-day training blocks. All questionnaires were optional and anonymous.
Data collected was collated and a reflexive thematic analysis was completed to identify core themes highlighting staff experiences.
Results:
Across both cohorts the self-rated knowledge scores consistently improved across each training block. Average scores went from 4/4.5 out of 10 prior to attending the training (cohort 1/cohort 2 respectively) to 8.6/8.4 out of 10 at the completion of training (cohort 1/cohort 2 respectively) across both cohorts. 100% of respondents felt that the training met their expectations, alongside 98% of respondents feeling that the training will improve their work.
A reflexive thematic analysis identified six core themes from the qualitative data: (1) feeling more comfortable – beginner to more competent, (2) the value of experiential learning, (3) growing through it, (4) learning together, (5) learning how to really listen and (6) empathetic hope for the future.
Conclusion:
The data identified that participants, overall, had a resoundingly positive experience of the training. Participants’ knowledge and understanding of dialogical principles improved, alongside participants also reporting positive changes both personally and relationally. The latter wasn’t an intended outcome but aligns with experiences of Open Dialogue training reported in the literature. The evaluation demonstrated that many participants left the training feeling hopeful for a future where dialogical principles areembedded into care delivery, and where individuals and their networks have more opportunities to have their voices heard.
This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of Childhood trauma (CT) subtypes and problematic internet use (PIU) among Sudanese medical students and the association between them. It examined which subtypes of the CT are most significantly associated with PIU, it also assessed the demographic predictors for PIU.
Methods:
A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire, it was distributed among 430 medical students from six universities located in Khartoum and Al Jazeera states, Sudan. Childhood maltreatment was measured using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF), and problematic internet use levels were assessed using the Chinese Internet Addiction Scale-Revised (CIAS-R). Both instruments are internationally validated. Descriptive statistics were reported as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and as medians with interquartile ranges for non-normally distributed continuous variables; Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression were used to assess associations and identify predictors of PIU while controlling for trauma-related anddemographic variables. A significance level of p <0.05 was applied.
Results:
Emotional abuse appeared as the most common form of childhood trauma, 48.8% (n=210), followed by physical neglect, 40.5% (n=174), and sexual abuse, 34.0% (n=146).The prevalence of problematic internet use among the participants was 46.0% (n=198). Also, a significant positive association was observed between PIU and overall CT scores (ρ=0.189, p<0.001). Among childhood trauma subtypes, emotional abuse had the strongest association with problematic internet use (ρ=0.219, p<0.001), while physical neglect, emotional neglect, and physical abuse also contributed. Furthermore, fifth-year students had remarkably lower CIAS-R scores compared to first-year students.
Conclusion:
Emotional abuse emerged as the strongest indicator of problematic internet use severity among medical students. These findings emphasize the necessity for trauma-informed interventions, including counselling services and awareness programmes, to indicate the influences of childhood trauma and minimize problematic internet use among Sudanese medical student populations. Future studies should assess the internal psychological factors through which emotional abuse influences problematic internet use; understanding these details will contribute to building more targeted interventions.
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of early-onset dementia accounting for approximately 10–20% of all dementia cases. The behavioural variant (bvFTD) is the most common presentation, comprising 50–57% of autopsy-confirmed FTD cases. bvFTD is highly heritable, and most implicated genes are MAPT, GRN (progranulin), and C9orf72.
Methods:
We report a case of two brothers, the first brother, aged 62, was assessed in the memory service in 2022 following a five-year history of behavioural change including inappropriate behaviour, overeating, apathy, and memory impairment. His Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACEIII) score was 56/100. CT brain imaging showed generalised atrophy, more pronounced on the right. PET CT demonstrated hypometabolism particularly in the right frontotemporal region. Amyloid PET imaging showed no abnormal amyloid binding.
The second brother, aged 64, was assessed in 2024 with a two-year history of progressive cognitive decline and pronounced frontal lobesymptoms including apathy, irritability, lack of insight, impaired executive function, and poor financial management leading to debt. He required family support for most activities of daily living and scored 24/100 on the ACE. CT brain imaging showed pronounced frontal and medial temporal lobe atrophy. FDG-PET demonstrated reduced uptake in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes.
Both brothers underwent whole genome sequencing and were found to be heterozygous for a GRN mutation. Predictive genetic testing was recommended to their children, and two of four tested positive for the mutation.
Results:
GRN mutations account for 35% of genetic FTD and around 10% of all FTD cases. GRN-FTD follows an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. In our patients, there was no family history of FTD, although their father had possible undiagnosed dementia while their mother had Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Notably, up to 13% of bvFTD cases carry a genetic variant despite no family history.
Genetic testing is a crucial diagnostic tool for defining the molecular pathology of the disease particularly in psychiatric settings where early bvFTD is often misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder. Furthermore, Identification of a GRN mutation is also essential for determining eligibility for clinical trials.
Predictive genetic testing for at-risk relatives enables them to make informed decisions regarding life and future care.
Conclusion:
This case highlights the importance of whole genome sequencing and predictive genetic testing even in the absence of a convincing family history. This could improve both patient care and our overall understanding of the disease.
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA) is a type of vascular disease present in more than 80% of confirmed Alzheimer’s disease patients. It is characterized by the presence of Amyloid-β protein deposited within the walls of vessels which results in various clinical presentations including vascular rupture of fragile amyloid-β laden vessels. Over the past 5 years, there has been a reported significant increase in publication, diagnoses, and referrals of CAA.
Methods:
In our memory service, features of CAA including peripheral microhaemorrhages and superficial siderosis were reported in 28% of MRI’s requested in the past year, with CAA specifically mentioned in 50% of those. This therefore poses several challenges on a memory service regarding how these should be interpreted and how they may affect the patient’s management plan, including how the patients stroke primary prevention should be reviewed in this setting, which will be outlined in this poster.
Results:
CAA and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) frequently co-occur due to their shared proteinopathy and both diseases share impaired clearance through perivascular drainage pathways as a primary pathogenic mechanism. However, they differ in location of protein deposition and peptide composition. Their clinical overlap is critical for memory services, as CAA accelerates cognitive decline through mechanisms such as white matter structural disconnection and microinfarction, even in the absence of acute haemorrhage.
The emergence of anti-Amyloid monoclonal antibodies also makes CAA awareness mandatory. These treatments can trigger Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), which represent an iatrogenic form of CAA-related inflammation. Pre-treatment screening with MRI is essential and current guidelines suggest that patients with features of CAA including microbleeds and cortical superficial siderosis should generally be excluded from these AD therapies due to high ARIA risk.
For patients diagnosed with CAA, aggressive vascular risk factor control is paramount to reduce recurrent haemorrhage risk. In patients with probable CAA, clinicians should exercise caution with anticoagulants, statins, and regular NSAID use, as these may exacerbate haemorrhagic risk in high-burden, and antiplatelet treatment for primary prevention is not recommended. This suggests improved collaboration between stroke and cognitive specialists is necessary to manage the complex balance between ischaemic prevention and haemorrhagic risk.
Conclusion:
Increasing awareness of CAA among doctors, including within memory services, is vital for accurate diagnosis, risk stratification, and the safe implementation of emerging AD therapeutics. This poster outlines the current evidence on the pathophysiology of CAA, including its overlap and differences with AD, and its current and future implications focussing on a memory service.
This quality improvement project aimed to assess current foot care practices on a psychiatric rehabilitation ward and to inform the implementation of a structured approach to routine foot checks delivered by ward staff.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study with semi-structured questionnaire administered by physicianto in-patients on a psychiatric rehabilitation ward to assess foot care practices in December 2025. Data were collected on demographics (age, sex), length of admission, history of foot inspection during admission, presence of foot problems, treatment received, patient attitudes towards routine foot checks, and risk factors for foot-related complications. Eight patients completed the questionnaire; two patients were unable to participate due to their current mental state. There were no exclusion criteria.
Results:
Only 25% of patients reported having had their feet inspected since admission. Of those who received a foot check, one patient was referred to podiatry for further assessment.
50% of these patients fall within the age of 45–64years.
75% of these patients have been on the current ward for more than a month and none expressed a preference for regular foot checks by staff. Three patients were identified ashaving risk factors for developing foot-related problems, including medical comorbidities and lifestyle factors, without evidence of consistent monitoring.
88% of these patients haven’t experienced any foot conditions since their stay.
Conclusion:
Routine foot care assessment was infrequent despite identifiable patient risk factors. Introducing a structured foot-check protocol with clearly defined staff responsibility may improve early identification of foot problems and support preventative physical health care in psychiatric rehabilitation settings. No external financial sponsorship was received for this project.
To assess compliance with Trust Smoke-Free standards on older adult psychiatric wards, specifically: documentation of smoking status on admission; timely initiation of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT); regular multidisciplinary team (MDT) review of tobacco dependence treatment; and referral to the Trust Tobacco Dependency Team. The audit also aimed to identify potential age - or diagnosis-related inequities in assessment and treatment.
Methods:
A cross-sectional baseline clinical audit was conducted across four older adult psychiatric inpatient wards. All inpatients present on 21/11/2025 were included (n=53). Data were extracted from electronic patient records (RiO), the electronic prescribing system (EPMA), and MDT documentation. Compliance was measured against four Trust Smoke-Free standards. Smoking status documentation was assessed across all admissions, while treatment, review, and referral standards were assessed in patients with documented tobacco dependence (n=6).
Results:
Smoking status was documented during admission clerking in 31% of patients (16/53). Among identified smokers, compliance with prescribing tobacco dependence treatment within 30 minutes of admission was 0%. Although 83% of smokers were eventually prescribed NRT, all prescriptions occurred more than five hours after admission, and 17% of smokers were never prescribed NRT. There was 0% compliance with regular MDT review of tobacco dependence treatment. Referral to the Tobacco Dependency Team within 24 hours occurred in only 17% of smokers.
Conclusion:
This audit demonstrates poor baseline compliance with Smoke-Free standards on older adult psychiatric wards, particularly in the identification and timely management of tobacco dependence. The findings highlight risks of diagnostic overshadowing and avoidable behavioural disturbance in older adult psychiatry. Targeted quality improvement interventions focusing on admission clerking, MDT review, and referral pathways are required to promote equitable, person-centred care and an equal standard of care. A re-audit is planned following implementation of these interventions.
Tardive Dyskinesia (TD) is a movement disorder that typically occurs in individuals with longstanding use of dopamine receptor blocking agents; this typically includes second generation anti-psychotics, but can also include anti-emetic/anti-vertigo drugs and even other drugs. The onset of TD is often insidious with the first symptoms presenting over days to weeks and usually even months, prior to development into a full syndrome. It can only occur 3 months after the exposure to such agents for those under the age of 60 and 1 month of exposure for those aged above 60.
Methods:
We present the case of a 66-year-old gentleman with a severe intellectual disability and a history of challenging behaviour. He has been previously under the care of his community learning disability service for a previous history of challenging behaviour but was re-referred on this occasion with the concerns about strange behaviour.
Staff noted and reported a intermittent abnormalities in movement and this gentleman’s case was referred to Psychiatry for follow up. These abnormalities also included difficulties in swallowing food. As part of the psychiatric evaluation the physical health of the gentleman was reviewed and the nature of the intermittent abnormalities in movement prompted a referral to the local Neurology department in order to evaluate whether there may be a form of epilepsy that this gentleman was suffering from. This gentleman was diagnosed with Tardive Dyskinesia after extensive ruling out of potential physical and mental health concerns. His treatment of Tetrabenazine was initiated and has since been tapered up to a total daily dose of 125mg per day. His symptoms have improved and with the aid of his local speech and language therapy team and dietetics team, he is able to safely eat food.
Results:
This case highlights the complexities of Tardive Dyskinesia and how these symptoms can be easily overlooked in someone with an intellectual disability. It also underscores the importance of proactive monitoring as well as regular medication review. This case further highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach towards the care of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Conclusion:
This case further highlights the need for structures screening for Tardive Dyskinesia in the ID population; particularly those receiving long-term antipsychotics. This case further lends weight to the regular use of movement assessments and reinforces the need for continued deprescribing where clinically appropriate.
Inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity are frequently associated with intellectual disability (ID), contributing to significant behavioural dysregulation and functional impairment. Protein kinase C (PKC) has emerged as a key molecular target in the neurobiology of impulsivity, with PKC overactivity disrupting dopaminergic regulation and prefrontal cortical functioning, leading to impaired inhibition and executive dysfunction. Endoxifen, an active metabolite of Tamoxifen, is a selective PKC inhibitor that has demonstrated antimanic, anti-impulsive, and emotion-stabilising effects in adults. Emerging clinical evidence suggests benefit in behavioural dysregulation across several psychiatric conditions; however, paediatric use remains limited and largely off-label. This case report aims to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of endoxifen for behavioural symptoms in an adolescent with ID who showed inadequate response to standard treatments.
Methods:
A 14-year-old male with global developmental delay and significant speech–language impairment presented with repetitive verbal behaviours, hyperactivity, poor sitting tolerance, and frequent anger outbursts for two years. He was provisionally diagnosed with ID with behavioural impairment. Baseline BMI was 21 kg/m², and comorbid hypothyroidism was managed with replacement therapy.
Previous trials of risperidone (4 mg/day) with divalproex sodium (1500 mg/day) resulted in minimal improvement and adverse effects, including nausea, increased appetite, and weight gain. Subsequent treatment with oxcarbazepine (titrated to 1350 mg/day) and aripiprazole (10 mg/day) was complicated by hyponatremia, necessitating discontinuation of oxcarbazepine.
Following informed consent and assent, endoxifen was initiated at 8 mg/day and gradually titrated to 24 mg/day, while aripiprazole was continued at 5 mg/day. Clinical response and tolerability were monitored over 12 months.
Results:
Over one year of treatment, the patient demonstrated sustained reductions in impulsivity, hyperactivity, repetitive behaviours, and anger outbursts, with notable improvements in behavioural regulation and overall family functioning. The medication was well tolerated, with no significant metabolic, neurological, or systemic adverse effects, and adherence remained satisfactory throughout follow-up.
Conclusion:
Endoxifen showed favourable efficacy and tolerability in managing behavioural dysregulation in an adolescent with ID who was refractory or intolerant to conventional psychotropics. Targeting PKC-mediated pathways may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for impulsivity and aggression in neurodevelopmental disorders. Larger controlled studies are needed to establish safety and long-term efficacy.
REM sleep behaviour disorder (RBD) is characterised by loss of physiological REM atonia, resulting in dream-enactment behaviours that may be violent and pose significant risk to patients and bed partners. RBD may be idiopathic, secondary to neurological disease, or medication-induced. Medications, including antidepressants and sedative-hypnotics, have been implicated in precipitating or unmasking RBD, particularly in individuals with underlying neuropsychiatric vulnerability and structural brain injury.
Methods:
A 60-year-old man who was diagnosed with PTSD following a severe physical assault 30 years ago. He also sustained a scalp laceration, severe bruising to his body, hearing impairment, memory problems, and anxiety problems. Documentation of prior neurological and neuroimaging follow-up was unavailable.
He presented with a six-year history of progressively worsening sleep-related behaviours. These included snoring, talking, shouting, odd sounds, nightmares, increased restlessness, abnormal nocturnal movements, falls from bed when startled, and a recent episode of violent behaviour during sleep resulting in injury to his partner. He had a longstanding psychotropic polypharmacy, including paroxetine, carbamazepine, risperidone, and zopiclone. Collateral history highlighted worsening impairment of his memory and concentration levels, and recent changes in his personality.
Physical examination revealed an abnormal gait, positive Romberg’s test and tremors of his upper limb, with involuntary tic-like movements and repetitive blinking. Cognitive assessment revealed significant deficits in memory, recall, attention and language. Due to a childhood history of petite mal epilepsy, an electroencephalogram was done and it showed no epileptiform discharges. Neuroimaging identified chronic gliotic change and encephalomalacia in the left frontal lobe, consistent with previous injury. Previous oximetry and multi-channel sleep studies excluded sleep apnoea.
Zopiclone and paroxetine were gradually discontinued, and sertraline and melatonin were initiated. Risk management involved separate sleeping arrangements. Subsequently, violent sleep-related behaviours resolved. The patient was referred to Memory Services for further neurocognitive assessment.
Results:
The combination of violent dream-enactment behaviours, associated injury to a bed partner, absence of epileptiform activity, structural frontal lobe injury and improvement following gradual withdrawal of long-term paroxetine and zopiclone supported a diagnosis of likely medication-induced RBD in the context of TBI.
Conclusion:
This case illustrates the risks of diagnostic overshadowing in patients with established psychiatric diagnoses and highlights the importance of considering organic and iatrogenic causes when new behavioural disturbance emerges, such as violent sleep-related behaviours. This case highlights the importance of awareness of the long-term neuropsychiatric sequelae of TBI and regular medication review and rationalisation to minimise iatrogenic harm
Physical health monitoring is crucial in early psychosis patients because of enhanced risk for physical health issues due to disease and prescribed anti-psychotic treatments. Early monitoring and intervention help identify and manage these risks, improving long term outcomes and quality of life. Physical health is often neglected in mental health care, auditing ensures comprehensive, Integrated care. Addressing physical health can enhance treatment adherence, reduce hospitalizations and improve recovery rates overall.
Methods:
We are proposing introduction of Lester UK tool and monitoring and intervening for physical health issues based on Lester UK recommendations only in high-risk patients identified from the case load of mid and north EIP.
5. Health behaviour and lifestyle changes eg. Alcohol intake Interventions and advice on daily exercise will be offered and will be according to the recommendations set by NCAP(National Clinical audit of Psychosis) adaptation of Lester UK and NAS (National Audit of Schizophrenia)
The standards will be compared with the physical health monitoring standards set by National Audit of Schizophrenia 2021 and National Clinical Audit for Psychosis 2022. 1st cycle will be Retrospective to compare local with national standards. Subsequent cycles will be concurrent. Estimated sample size is approx. 30 high risk cases.This will be reaudited every 6 months to match the standards. A target of 80 % is set to be achieved after the interventions offered.
Retrospective data was collected for first cycle of audit using Blood test results on ICE, Physical health check form on RiO notes and GP data from CHIE/GP Connect. 118 patients were audited and out of these patients 54 have been identified in high-risk zones based on 6 different categories.
Results:
Standards were compared with Physical health monitoring and intervention in National Audit of Schizophrenia and National Clinical audit of psychosis.
Monitoring and identifying risk of smoking, alcohol, illicit substance, high BMI, High blood pressure, high lipids and high blood glucose is more than required standards of 75 %.
Acceptance rate of smoking cessation (18%) is significantly below the matching standards of 75 %. This requires proactive measures to educate patients of smoking related health risks and encouraged to quit smoking.
33 % patients accepted NICE recommended interventions for alcohol use, below 75% standards. This requires improved motivational strategies and personalised intervention plans.
Only 6 % patients accepted advise to abstain from illicit substances. This requires motivation and encouragement for patients to refer to Inclusion services and accept advise provided.
100 % patients with high HBs-668C were referred to primary services but only 8 % patients accepted high HAB1C related NICE recommendations. Consistent monitoring and oroactivemanagement of metabolic health is required.
100 % patients from those identified with high Cholesterol/HDL ratio accepted referral to primary services but only 10 % accepted lifestyle modification advice. Ongoing patient education and encouraging for healthy lifestyle is required.
100 % of those identified with high BMI accepted NICE recommendations for healthy life style and referral to primary services. The success of interventions will depend on patient’s adherence and strategies to enhance motivation, and accessibility should be put in place.
100% patients accepted NICE recommended interventions for hypertension and referral to primary services.
Conclusion:
INSIGHT Audit reveals gaps in meeting the standards set by NAS and NCAP for interventions although meeting standards for monitoring. While interventions are aligned with national standards, patient engagement and adherence remain major challenges that require action like patient’s education regarding physical health benefits and team’s knowledge and implementation of Lester tool recommended interventions. We have recommended the action plan for interventions before next cycle of audit.
In Northern Ireland, the prevalence of mental health disorders is estimated to be significantly higher than in England, set against a backdrop of socioeconomic deprivation. Consequently, a resilient workforce is a clinical imperative. However, postgraduate training often leaves a critical gap between theoretical knowledge of The Mental Health Order (NI) 1986 and the emotional endurance required to apply its principles in acute settings. This paper describes the development of a high-fidelity simulation designed to bridge this gap. The primary aim was to transform a morally injurious personal experience into a safe educational tool, teaching trainees to navigate the conflict between the Hippocratic instinct to treat and the strict statutory limits regarding patient autonomy.
Methods:
A high-fidelity simulation was developed within the Western Health & Social Care Trust as part of a Psychiatric Emergencies Simulation Day. Grounded in Kolb’s experiential learning cycle and the author’s dual background as a Solicitor and Psychiatrist, the scenario involves a voluntary patient with Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (EUPD) and Type 1 Diabetes refusing insulin. The patient is fully capacitous, aware of the risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA), yet refuses treatment due to emotional dysregulation. The simulation utilizes Bion’s theory of containment; the facilitator absorbs trainee anxiety (counter-transference) to prevent the loss of a mentalizing stance, modelling how to regulate the urge to utilize coercive measures prematurely.
Results:
The simulation exposes the visceral conflict between the right to life (ECHR Article 2) and the right to private life/autonomy (ECHR Article 8). Trainees are forced to confront the specific constraints of the MHO (NI) 1986, which precludes detention solely based on Personality Disorder. The scenario demonstrates that the threshold for overriding a competent refusal is the high bar of the Common Law doctrine of Necessity. The primary learning outcome is the realization that the hardest clinical decision is often not to treat.
Conclusion:
This educational intervention successfully establishes that respecting legally protected autonomy, even when it risks catastrophe, exacts a heavy toll of moral distress. By integrating legal jurisprudence with psychotherapeutic principles of containment, the simulation acts as a sublimation of moral injury. It demonstrates that curriculum development must address the “faceless” demands of the law alongside the human needs of the doctor. Providing a controlled environment to bear the “unbearable weight of autonomy” is an ethical imperative for mitigating burnout and ensuring true patient-centred care.
According to NICE guideline, psychotropic medication has limited role to improve clinical outcome in EUPD patients. However, the practice of utilising psychotropic medication is increasing. The aim of this audit is to assess whether prescribing psychotropic medication in the absence of any other psychiatric co morbidities improves the clinical outcome.
Methods:
The audit was completed at the Scarisbrick In-patient unit at Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust. The number of hospital admission within next 1 year of starting psychotropic medication was used as the indicator for clinical outcome. Data was collected retrospectively from the electronic system from the patients’ cohort who were admitted from 01/2023-12/2023, with diagnosis of EUPD in the absence of other psychiatric comorbidities, (N=29) to assess if prescribing psychotropic medication can reduce number of hospital admission within next 1 year (between 01/24- 12/2024).
Results:
The result shows high rate of psychotropic medication used in patients with EUPD diagnosis in the absence of any other psychiatric comorbidities. 62% patients were already on antidepressants and 55% on antipsychotics prior to admission. After medication review post admission, 55% started on psychotropics, including 41% on antipsychotics, 35% on antidepressants, and 14% on mood stabilisers.
Despite being on psychotropic medications, the readmission rate within next 1 year remains high. 58.62 % (N=17) patients had re-admissions within one year of starting psychotropics. Of those, 71% (N=12)had more than one admission. 65% (N=11) of readmissions were under the Mental Health Act. For 76% (N=13) patients, admission lasted more than 2 weeks and 24% had crisis admission.
The audit focuses solely on pharmacological data. There is no mention of psychological input, crisis plans, care coordination, which is central to NICE/RCPsych recommendations.
Conclusion:
High proportion of patients with EUPD are prescribed psychotropic medications before and during admission, despite the limited evidence supporting their effectiveness in this population. This is not consistent with NICE, which cautions againstroutine psychotropic use in EUPD in the absence of comorbidities or clear indications. Over half of patients were re-admitted to hospital within next one year of starting psychotropic medication and most had multiple re-admissions. The high re-admission rate, particularly under the MHA and with prolonged stays, raises concern about the effectiveness of psychotropic medication in reducing relapse or improving long-term outcomes in EUPD. The data appears to support NICE guidance that psychotropic medications should not be used routinely in the absence of comorbid mental illness, as their benefit in preventing relapse is questionable.
Trainees’ wellbeing is constantly becoming an area of increased interest in the recent years. The impact of the pandemic, increased workload while balancing exams, training requirements, and family and caring responsibilities can pose significant demands on trainees. Psychiatry trainees are not immune to those challenges, but furthermore, they are susceptible to challenges unique to psychiatry – such as patient suicide, working in a field that still suffers from stigma from both patients and healthcare professionals. Despite the presence of resources, wellbeing remains an area for improvement.
In our study, we sought to explore areas that impact the wellbeing of psychiatry trainees in the northwest of England; the challenges encountered and the factors that contributed both negatively and positively to health and wellbeing.
Methods:
We conducted online focus groups with psychiatry trainees in different stages in their training (CT1-ST8), to explore factors affecting health and wellbeing. Each session was co-facilitated by the research team, and structured into three sections: challenges faced, unhelpful experiences, and helpful experiences. Sessions were transcribed via Microsoft Teams, with participants informed of confidentiality and anonymity, and demographic data collected via an anonymous online questionnaire. Transcripts were thematically analysed by the research team to identify key themes.
Results:
Trainees reported multiple factors negatively affecting their wellbeing, including the rotational nature of the job, significant workload, lack of rest facilities, lack of appropriate supervision, and lack of individualised support for trainees with personal vulnerabilities. Challenges were compounded by difficulties navigating administrative systems and accessing occupational health or professional support. Helpful factors included supportive and flexible supervisors, strong team relationships, good workplace integration, as well as respecting and nurturing trainees’ autonomy and sharing constructive feedback.
Conclusion:
The quality of the trainee–supervisor relationship emerged as the most important factor influencing wellbeing, with emotionally intelligent supervisors who notice struggles and encourage reflective practice being particularly beneficial. While multiple support resources exist, they are often not tailored to individual needs or widely known; targeted training for supervisors, including guidance on supporting neurodiverse trainees, may improve accessibility and effectiveness of wellbeing support.
In Bangladesh, mental healthcare is delivered through parallel government and private psychiatric services. Both sectors play a critical role in service provision but there is limited empirical evidence comparing how these systems operate in practice from the perspective of clinicians working across both settings.
This study aimed to explore and compare clinician experiences of working in government and private psychiatric services in Bangladesh. We hypothesised that government services would be characterised by higher patient volume and resource constraints, while private services would offer more structured multidisciplinary care, greater patient autonomy, and improved continuity, albeit with increased administrative demands and financial barriers.
Methods:
A qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using structured written responses from 24 multidisciplinary mental health professionals who had worked in both government and private psychiatric settings. Participants included psychiatrists, resident medical officers, psychologists, nurses, and counsellors. Responses explored workload, resource availability, multidisciplinary team (MDT) working, patient autonomy, family involvement, medication practices, psychotherapy access, stigma, risk management, admission duration, and discharge processes. Data were analysed inductively to identify recurring and contrasting themes across the two service models.
Results:
Six interrelated themes emerged.
First, patient volume and workload were markedly higher in government services, with clinicians reporting time-pressured assessments and limited follow-up, whereas private services had lower patient volumes but greater documentation and accountability requirements.
Second, resource availability differed substantially, with chronic shortages of staff, investigations, and therapeutic spaces in government settings compared to better infrastructure in private care.
Third, multidisciplinary team (MDT) working was informal or fragmented in government services but more structured and routine in private hospitals.
Fourth, patient autonomy and family involvement were constrained in government settings due to workload and system pressures, while private services allowed greater shared decision-making, though sometimes influenced by family finances.
Fifth, medication and psychotherapy practices showed guideline-based intentions in both sectors; however, polypharmacy and irregular follow-up were more common in government care, while psychotherapy access and monitoring were more consistent privately.
Finally, risk management, admission duration, and discharge planning were reactive and bed-pressure driven in government services, compared with more planned and individualised pathways in private settings.
Conclusion:
The findings support the hypothesis that government and private psychiatric services in Bangladesh offer contrasting but complementary strengths. Government services provide accessibility and broad clinical exposure, while private services offer structure, continuity, and multidisciplinary care. Hybrid service models integrating these strengths may improve quality, equity, and sustainability of mental healthcare in similar low- and middle-income countries.
To improve inpatient understanding of liaison psychiatry, specifically the services provided by the Older Adult Mental Health Liaison Team (OA MHLT), by at least 10%, and to improve satisfaction with understanding of key OA MHLT topics among patients. Wehypothesised that a written information booklet would increase patient understanding compared with verbal explanations alone.
Liaison psychiatry is often introduced during acute physical illness, cognitive vulnerability, or heightened distress, which can limit patients’ ability to process and retain verbal information. A written resource is expected to support patient and carer understanding of the rationale for psychiatric involvement, assessment processes and interventions offered.
Methods:
OA MHLT staff (n=10) completed a questionnaire to identify high-priority topics for inclusion in a patient information booklet. Inpatients (n=10) were asked how well informed they felt about OA MHLT related topics (including assessment and interventions, psychological support, legal frameworks such as the Mental Health Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS), discharge pathways and crisis support) and their satisfaction with their understanding overall (0–5 Likert scale). A patient information booklet was created based on questionnaire findings and distributed to inpatients, after which the patient and staff questionnaire was repeated.
Results:
Before booklet distribution, mean staff-rated satisfaction with patient understanding of OA MHLT topics was 1.86/5 and mean patient-rated satisfaction with their understanding was 2.00/5. After booklet distribution, mean staff-rated satisfaction increased to just under 4.6/5 and mean patient-rated satisfaction increased to 4.4/5, exceeding the project aim of ≥10% improvement.
Conclusion:
A co-designed OA MHLT patient information booklet was associated with substantially improved staff-rated and patient-rated satisfaction with patient understanding of key liaison psychiatry topics in a small inpatient sample. Further work should evaluatesustainability over time and test the booklet with larger numbers of inpatients. The booklet is due to receive further feedback and final modifications via the service user and carer advisory group.
To assess whether information recorded on T2B and T3B treatment forms accurately corresponds to medications prescribed to patients by Community Mental Health Teams (CMHT) or General Practitioners (GPs). The hypothesis was that discrepancies may exist due to the absence of inpatient safeguards in community settings.
Methods:
Under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003, patients on compulsory treatment for more than two months require T2B or T3B forms. T2B for consented treatment and T3B for treatment approved by a Designated Medical Practitioner (DMP). These forms protect patient rights and must be completed accurately. Guidance is provided by the Mental Welfare Commission through publications such as Consent to Treatment (2017) and Medical Treatment under Part 16 (2021), with an updated consent guide published in October 2025 (postdating this audit).
T2B forms should specify exact medications while T3B may list broader drug classes. Inpatient settings have safeguards like electronic records alerts, dispensing checks, and MDT oversight. These are absent in community care, where CMHTs request medication changes via GPs and do not dispense most medications directly. If patients are reviewed by clinicians other than their Responsible Medical Officer (RMO), there is a risk of unauthorized treatment.
Methods:
The audit reviewed all patients on T2B and T3B forms under NHSGGC Adult CMHTs (Renfrewshire, Inverclyde, South Glasgow, North East Glasgow, and North West Glasgow HSCPs) with Caldicott approval. A checklist assessed whether forms were in date, uploaded to EMIS (electronic records), included consent (for T2B), referenced in clinicletters, and matched ECS (GP Emergency Care Summary) records.
Medical records provided listing of patients on Compulsory Treatment Orders (CTO) and treatment forms. Separate audits for each site were conducted by core trainees and reviewed by Dr Mai Elsawaf who combined a report. Data access occurred between June and October 2025, though timing varied between teams, a noted limitation.
Results:
A total of 558 patients were included (491 General Adult, 36 Forensic, 8 Learning Disability, 23 Older Adults). Most forms were for CCTO (Community Compulsory Treatment Order) patients, aligning with the audit’s scope. T3B forms were more common than T2B, reflecting treatment as a key reason for CCTO. Compliance was high, with 99.8% of forms and consent uploaded to EMIS.
However, only 85% of clinic letters mentioned treatment orders, and just 14% referenced treatment forms, limiting information sharing with GPs and emergency teams. Medication alignment was strong (90%), with discrepancies due to additional psychotropics. ECS correspondence was lower (80%), with missing or incorrect entries posing risks, especially for clozapine, which was absent in two cases. Other mismatches were due to dose adjustments not reflected in forms. Best practice includes reissuing updated forms or using dose ranges and alternative plans on T3B forms.
Conclusion:
The audit showed 90% correspondence between treatment forms and prescribed medications, with main discrepancies from additional medications and poor documentation in clinic letters. Actions taken included contacting relevant teams with discrepancies and changing the format of the clinic letters to include information on treatment forms. Recommendations include re-circulating guidance, adding EMIS alerts, considering inclusion of treatment form details in clinic letters, and re-auditing in 12 months.
Antipsychotic medications are commonly prescribed for psychotic illness, bipolar affective disorder and treatment-resistant depression. They are associated with significant physical health risks, including metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular complications, and extrapyramidal side effects. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends comprehensive physical health monitoring at baseline, three months, and twelve months following initiation of antipsychotic treatment. Recommended physical health parameters include blood tests, body mass index (BMI) or body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiogram (ECG) for certain antipsychotics, and side-effect profiles.
Antipsychotic medications can be safely prescribed to patients in the perinatal period, however, it is necessary to monitor their physical health. This project aimed to evaluate adherence to the aforementioned NICE guidelines, for all patients prescribed antipsychotic medications within a perinatal mental health community service (PMHCS).
Methods:
A retrospective review of all patients under the PMHCS caseload as of 1 August 2025 was conducted (n=388). Electronic case notes were reviewed to identify patients prescribed antipsychotic medication. Data collected included diagnosis, medication prescribed, duration of treatment and completion of recommended physical health monitoring in comparison to NICE guidance.
Results:
Of the 92 patients (24%) prescribed antipsychotic medication, 53 (58%) had medication initiated by PMHCS. The most common diagnosis was Bipolar Affective Disorder (34%) and quetiapine was the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic medication (51%).
Just over half of the cohort had baseline monitoring recorded (n=47, 51%) but certain parameters were commonly omitted; only 20% had Hbs-392c recorded and 34% had a blood pressure recorded. A total of 75 patients had been taking an antipsychotic medication for over three months, of which 31 (41%) had physical health monitoring to reflect this. There were 57 patients who had taken an antipsychotic medication for at least one year and amongst them, 31 (54%) had physical health monitoring.
Conclusion:
Our results demonstrated that despite NICE guidance outlining the required monitoring, it was uncommon for patients within this cohort to have the necessary investigations recorded at the required intervals. To address this, the team devised a structured antipsychotic monitoring strategy that included patient education, dissemination of patient information leaflets on physical health monitoring, distribution of monitoring equipment amongst staff, staff training, and recruitment of dedicated physical health nurses. Designated physical health clinic days and systematic data recording were planned to improve monitoring. A re-audit is planned to evaluate the impact of these interventions on compliance with physical health monitoring standards.