To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The debate on paternalism is important as it is illustrative of a wider controversy about the nature and role of political philosophy, in particular with respect to moral conflicts and how they are to be resolved. This chapter provides a brief outline of the prevailing, liberal view on paternalism and explains the various forms of paternalistic power. The prevailing, liberal view on paternalism does rely upon arguments from consent. A widely held assumption among liberals is that paternalism is a justified treatment of those who lack the qualities of an agent. An area of profound disagreement between liberals and pluralists concerns whether or not paternalism involves moral conflict. The chapter argues that paternalists must believe that the people over whom paternalistic power is exercised do generally believe that they generally know what is for their own good.
This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book begins with the romantic construction of chocolate, and attempts to understand the actual human endeavours, and systematic exploitation, which have made chocolate fantasies possible. It examines a different stage in the cocoa commodity chain: from the farming of cocoa beans, to the site of chocolate manufacture, to the marketing of the finished goods. The book tackles imperial histories of chocolate and how British firms, including Henry Isaac Rowntree, constructed their own romantic narratives of the 'discovery' and development of chocolate production. It is devoted to women's experiences of cocoa farming in British colonies and former colonies. The book explores the ways in which Rowntree created and reflected particular understandings of York and of empire, through media such as their in-house journal, Cocoa Works Magazine (CWM).
Ahmednagar became the most enduring and emblematic camp in India during the Great War, and also held the largest number of prisoners. Despite the tiny numbers of Germans in India compared with the larger communities in other parts of the Empire, internment camps would emerge there as part of an imperial system of incarceration. The largely integrated German communities of Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and South Africa faced official and unofficial Germanophobia which gripped the British Empire. Despite the violent nationalism created by the First World War, Christian brotherhood ultimately survived in India. Most male members of the German community in India in 1914 experienced internment, although its nature remained humane. The Foreigners Ordinances and the Trading with the Enemy laws dealt with German firms in India. Following the legislation against enemy businesses, the Basel Trading Company required its directors of German origin to resign and then face internment.
This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book analyses through which the Barbadian authorities strove to regulate and control the sexual freedoms of poor white Barbadian women, whose perceived sexual and social unruliness distinguished them as a potential threat to white hegemony. It charts the gradual transformation of Sarah Hicks Williams, a young Northern-born woman and supporter of abolitionism into a staunch defender of Southern slavery. The book explores Barbadian women's property interests, though the focus is primarily on women as slaveholders. It explores the significance of property ownership in shaping gendered social relations in the South, how those social relations structured white women's access to and ownership of property, and in particular, white women's ownership of slaves as property.
In colonial and post-colonial studies Ireland is presented as a unique phenomenon, as it can be viewed, paradoxically, as both 'imperial' and 'colonial'. The book concentrates on the latter characteristic as the 'imperial' has received more attention than the 'colonial' in the recent historical studies in relation to Ireland and India exclusively. It illuminates the role of figures and organisations previously considered somewhat obscure in both Indian and Irish history. The book shows how effective League Against Imperialism (LAI) was as a means by which Indo-Irish connections were established and flourished in the inter-war period. It demonstrates how the Comintern policy of attempting to solicit broad-based support in the colonies by advocating tolerance towards the noncommunist Left and colonial nationalist movements, and its abandonment was followed by the LAI's rapid decline. The book reveals a significant amount about Indian Political Intelligence (IPI), an agency almost entirely overlooked in intelligence historiography.
Chapter six discuss the notion of 'the local' through the history of governance in colonial and post-colonial India. The authors focus on ability of liberal governance to adapt to local culture. They discuss Ilan Kapoor's integration of postcolonial theory with debates on development and use this to identify what could make the liberal peacebuilders more open towards the idea of greater inclusion of local voices. The authors suggest that emphasis should be put on socio-cultural sensitivity. This entails that the international interveners should familiarize themselves with the context as much as possible. They invite critical analysis of the main issues at stake, which would be aimed against relevant theoretical debates. The authors also call for attention to the distribution of resources that are usually limited in conflict settings. They conclude that as long as subjective norms and interests of the peacebuilders are harmonised with local culture and practices - not creating tensions - they can be legitimately promoted.
This chapter proposes a revision of our understanding of political discourse in late Elizabethan Ireland and public policy there more generally. Previously it has largely been contended that officials in Ireland at this time began to believe that the country was beyond ‘reform’ and that a harsh brand of military subjugation would have to be employed to create a tabula rasa on which an English society could be constructed. Converse to this the chapter argues that officials were actually deeply critical of Tudor policy in Ireland itself at this time. Accordingly they argued that what was needed was a more conciliatory approach to the governance of the country and reformation of the gross levels of militarisation and corruption which had become endemic there. These views were clearly laid out in a literature of complaint which emerged in the ‘reform’ treatises being written at this time. The chapter is primarily an exploration of this literature of complaint. It also examines the treatises attendant upon the inception of the Munster Plantation. Finally, it examines attitudes towards the problem posed by Ulster in the 1580s and early 1590s and queries what policies were promoted for the province in the years preceding the outbreak of the Nine Years War in 1594.
This chapter argues that, contrary to which some historians have argued, opposition to change was not an inherent feature of the colonial state. Indeed, officials wanted to alter a good deal about Africa. Officials’ attitudes to change were governed by a number of factors in addition to a simple analysis as to what they felt would be of benefit to Africans. In their endorsement or rejection of certain ideas and policies, officials were influenced by calculations as to the likely impact of these ideas and policies on their ability to improve their own lot. Furthermore, responses to change were also a contingent outcome of certain struggles for power and autonomy within the ranks. Officials’ faith in their own capacity for supervising and managing their localities meant they felt that if they were able to prevent the incursions of others into their district, they could work as the arbiters of stable development. Consequently, officials were not haunted by an inherent sense of conflict between stasis and change.