To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Szemerédi's regularity lemma and its variants are some of the most powerful tools in combinatorics. In this paper, we establish several results around the regularity lemma. First, we prove that whether or not we include the condition that the desired vertex partition in the regularity lemma is equitable has a minimal effect on the number of parts of the partition. Second, we use an algorithmic version of the (weak) Frieze–Kannan regularity lemma to give a substantially faster deterministic approximation algorithm for counting subgraphs in a graph. Previously, only an exponential dependence for the running time on the error parameter was known, and we improve it to a polynomial dependence. Third, we revisit the problem of finding an algorithmic regularity lemma, giving approximation algorithms for several co-NP-complete problems. We show how to use the weak Frieze–Kannan regularity lemma to approximate the regularity of a pair of vertex subsets. We also show how to quickly find, for each ε′>ε, an ε′-regular partition with k parts if there exists an ε-regular partition with k parts. Finally, we give a simple proof of the permutation regularity lemma which improves the tower-type bound on the number of parts in the previous proofs to a single exponential bound.
In this paper we study a question related to the classical Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem, which states that any family of k-element subsets of the set [n] = {1,. . .,n} in which any two sets intersect has cardinality at most $\binom{n-1}{k-1}$.
We say that two non-empty families ${\mathcal A}, {\mathcal B}\subset \binom{[n]}{k}$ are s-cross-intersecting if, for any A ∈ ${\mathcal A}$, B ∈ ${\mathcal B}$, we have |A ∩ B| ≥ s. In this paper we determine the maximum of |${\mathcal A}$|+|${\mathcal B}$| for all n. This generalizes a result of Hilton and Milner, who determined the maximum of |${\mathcal A}$|+|${\mathcal B}$| for non-empty 1-cross-intersecting families.
Let C63 be the 3-uniform hypergraph on {1, . . ., 6} with edges 123,345,561, which can be seen as the analogue of the triangle in 3-uniform hypergraphs. For sufficiently large n divisible by 6, we show that every n-vertex 3-uniform hypergraph H with minimum codegree at least n/3 contains a C63-factor, that is, a spanning subhypergraph consisting of vertex-disjoint copies of C63. The minimum codegree condition is best possible. This improves the asymptotic result obtained by Mycroft and answers a question of Rödl and Ruciński exactly.
Fascinating connections exist between group theory and automata theory, and a wide variety of them are discussed in this text. Automata can be used in group theory to encode complexity, to represent aspects of underlying geometry on a space on which a group acts, and to provide efficient algorithms for practical computation. There are also many applications in geometric group theory. The authors provide background material in each of these related areas, as well as exploring the connections along a number of strands that lead to the forefront of current research in geometric group theory. Examples studied in detail include hyperbolic groups, Euclidean groups, braid groups, Coxeter groups, Artin groups, and automata groups such as the Grigorchuk group. This book will be a convenient reference point for established mathematicians who need to understand background material for applications, and can serve as a textbook for research students in (geometric) group theory.
The purpose of this book is to present—in a coherent and lucid way—the mathematical theory and algorithms of the finite element method, which is the most widely-used method for the solution of partial differential equations in the field of Computational Science. We believe that the full potential of the finite element method can be realised only when the theoretical background and the implemented algorithms are considered as a unit.
The selection of the basic mathematical theory of finite elements in this book is based on lectures given in the “Finite Element I and II” courses offered for several years at Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg and in the “Finite Element I” course offered at the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. Furthermore, the finite element algorithms presented are based on the knowledge and experience gained through the development of our in-house finite element package for more than 10 years. The theory and algorithms of finite elements that we describe here are self-contained; our aim is that beginners will find our book to be both readable and useful.
We start in Chapter 1 with a brief introduction to Sobolev spaces and the necessary basics of functional analysis. This will help those readers who are unfamiliar with functional analysis. The goal of Chapter 2 is to explain the finite element method to beginners in the simplest possible way. The concepts of weak solutions, variational formulation of second-order elliptic boundary value problems, incorporation of different boundary conditions in a variational form, and the standard Galerkin approach are all introduced in this chapter. Moreover, existence and uniqueness theory (the Lax-Milgram Theorem) and an abstract error analysis (quasi-optimality of the method) are presented here.
The next two Chapters give the basic theory of the finite element method. In Chapter 3, the construction of finite elements on simplices, quadrilaterals, and hexahedrals is discussed in detail. Furthermore, linear, bilinear and isoparametric transformations are explained, and mapped finite elements are considered. Chapter 4 deals with the interpolation theory of affine equivalent finite elements in Sobolev spaces. We also discuss the interpolation of functions that are less smooth; in particular, Scott-Zhang interpolation is described in this Chapter.
In a Markov chain started at a state x, the hitting time τ(y) is the first time that the chain reaches another state y. We study the probability $\mathbb{P}_x(\tau(y) = t)$ that the first visit to y occurs precisely at a given time t. Informally speaking, the event that a new state is visited at a large time t may be considered a ‘surprise’. We prove the following three bounds.
• In any Markov chain with n states, $\mathbb{P}_x(\tau(y) = t) \le {n}/{t}$.
• In a reversible chain with n states, $\mathbb{P}_x(\tau(y) = t) \le {\sqrt{2n}}/{t}$ for $t \ge 4n + 4$.
• For random walk on a simple graph with n ≥ 2 vertices, $\mathbb{P}_x(\tau(y) = t) \le 4e \log(n)/t$.
We construct examples showing that these bounds are close to optimal. The main feature of our bounds is that they require very little knowledge of the structure of the Markov chain.
To prove the bound for random walk on graphs, we establish the following estimate conjectured by Aldous, Ding and Oveis-Gharan (private communication): for random walk on an n-vertex graph, for every initial vertex x,
Let $\mathcal F$ ⊂ 2[n] be a family of subsets. The diameter of $\mathcal F$ is the maximum of the size of symmetric differences among pairs of members of $\mathcal F$. In 1966 Kleitman determined the maximum of |$\mathcal F$| for fixed diameter. However, this important classical result lacked a characterization of the families meeting the bound. This is remedied in the present paper, where a best possible stability result is established as well.
In Section 4 we introduce a ‘parity trick’ that provides an easy way of deducing the odd case from the even case in both Kleitman's original theorem and its stability version.