To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To make a current flow, you have to push on the charges. How fast they move, in response to a given push, depends on the nature of the material. For most substances, the current density is proportional to the force per unit charge, .
Small differences in the densities of a river confluence's tributaries (i.e. 0.5 kg m$^{-3}$) have been proposed to cause coherent streamwise-oriented vortices (SOVs) in its mixing interface. These secondary flow structures are thought to result from density-driven gravity currents being laterally confined between the converging flows. However, empirical evidence for density SOVs and the confined gravity current mechanism is lacking. To this end, experiments are carried out in a laboratory confluence permitting a spectrum of thermal density differences between its tributaries. Particle image velocimetry and laser-induced fluorescence are used simultaneously to study the mixing interface's dynamics. The sensitivity of the mixing interface's secondary flow structure to the confluence's momentum ratio and the magnitude of the density difference is evaluated. Density SOVs are confirmed in the mixing interface and are caused by the gravity currents being confined laterally as the opposing flows merge and accelerate downstream. The SOVs are largest and most coherent when the momentum of the dense channel is greater than that of the light channel. The dynamics of these secondary flow structures is strongly coupled to periodic vertically orientated Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities. The striking similarities between the empirically reproduced SOVs herein and those recently observed at the Coaticook-Massawippi confluence (Quebec, Canada), despite a two-order magnitude difference in physical scale, suggest density SOVs are a scale-independent flow structure at confluences when specific, yet relatively common, hydraulic and density conditions align.
This chapter surveys some topics that could influence widespread VR usage in the future, but are currently in a research and development stage. Sections 13.1 and 13.2 cover the forgotten senses. Earlier in this book, we covered vision, hearing, and balance (vestibular) senses, which leaves touch, smell, and taste. Section 13.1 covers touch, or more generally, the somatosensory system. This includes physiology, perception, and engineering technology that stimulates the somatosensory system. Section 13.2 covers the two chemical senses, smell and taste, along with attempts to engineer “displays” for them. Section 13.3 discusses how robots are used for telepresence and how they may ultimately become our surrogate selves through which the real world can be explored with a VR interface. Just like there are avatars in a virtual world (Section 10.4), the robot becomes a kind of physical avatar in the real world. Finally, Section 13.4 discusses steps toward the ultimate level of human augmentation and interaction: brain–machine interfaces.
Classical mechanics obeys the principle of relativity: the same laws apply in any inertial reference frame. By “inertial” I mean that the system is at rest or moving with constant velocity.1 Imagine, for example, that you have loaded a billiard table onto a railroad car, and the train is going at constant speed down a smooth straight track. The game will proceed exactly the same as it would if the train were parked in the station; you don’t have to “correct” your shots for the fact that the train is moving – indeed, if you pulled all the curtains, you would have no way of knowing whether the train was moving or not.
Maritime traffic risk is increasing rapidly with the growth of marine traffic volume and construction of marine facilities, water bridges, port development, marine wind farm, etc. Given this emerging trend, this paper presents a bibliometric analysis and mapping of the broad academic literature related to maritime traffic safety, focusing on the influences of international collaborations and knowledge sources on the developments of this research domain. To identify trends, patterns and the knowledge distribution of the research on maritime traffic safety, the visualisation of similarities (VOS) viewer software, the bibliometric analysis, and scientometric mapping of the literature have been performed from the perspectives of publication and citation distribution over time, leading authors, countries (regions), institutions, the corresponding collaboration networks, most cited publications and references, focused research fields and topics, research trend evolution over time, etc. The paper provides a comprehensive and quantitative overview and significant picture representation of the domain's leading and evolutionary trends by employing specific aforementioned bibliometric analysis factors. In addition, by reviewing the evolutionary trends of the journals and the proposed investigated factors, such as the influential works, main research topics, and the research frontiers, this paper reveals the scientific literature's main research objectives and directions that could be addressed and explored in future studies.
Reliable anti-collision control algorithms conforming with the rules regulating traffic at sea, the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREG), are essential for the deployment of autonomous vessels in waters shared with other ships. The development of such methods is an active field of research. However, little attention has been given to how these rules are interpreted by experienced mariners, and how such information can be parametrised for use in automatic control systems and autonomous ships. This paper presents a method for exploiting historical automatic identification system (AIS) data to characterise parameters indicating the prevalent practices at sea in encounters with high collision risk. The method has been tested on data gathered in areas off the Norwegian coast over several years. Statistics on relevant parameters from the resulting dataset and the relation between them is presented. The results indicate that the strongest influence on vessel behaviour is the type of situation, and the amount of land and grounding hazards in the vessel's proximity.
The Fokker Dr.1 triplane is without doubt one of the most well-known fighter types of the First World War. However, it was preceded on the front much earlier by a similar British type; the Sopwith Triplane. Although it was built, just like the Fokker Dr.1, in relatively low numbers, it never got as famous as the Dreidecker flown by the German ace Manfred von Richthofen. In fact this was quite undeserved; the Sopwith Triplane entered the front much earlier than the Fokker Dr.1 and it was flown very successfully by a number of British aces before it was replaced by the much more known Sopwith Camel. Most famous Triplane ace was Raymond Collishaw, who scored no less than 34 of his total of 60 aerial victories on the Sopwith Triplane!
RISE AND FALL OF THE SOPWITH AIRCRAFT COMPANY LTD. AT KINGSTON-UPON-THAMES
T.O.M. Sopwith (Thomas) was born in Kensington, London on 18 January 1888. His father was a civil engineer who died when Thomas Sopwith still was a child. He followed a technical education and soon became very interested in aviation. He taught himself to fly, making his first solo flight on 22 October 1910. Although his first flight was very short and ended in a crash, he did not give up and he soon gained his flying certificate. On 18 December 1910, Sopwith won a £4000 prize for the longest flight from England to the Continent in a British-built aeroplane, flying 169 miles (272 km) in 3 hours 40 minutes. He used the winnings to set up the Sopwith School of Flying at Brooklands. In 1912 he set up, together with Fred Sirgist, a company for the design and construction of aircraft as the Sopwith Aviation Company Ltd..
The new company had a difficult start, but with the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 business was soon booming thanks to a number of highly successful military aircraft. Best known are the 1½-Strutter, the Pup, Triplane and last but not least the Camel. When the war ended, things changed dramatically with an enormous decline in aircraft needed. The company had earned enough money to survive this period, but shortly after the war the government charged punitive and excessive so-called anti-profiteering taxes. The company was forced to dissolve itself in 1920. However, a fresh restart was made with new capital.
Although the title of this book suggests it only gives a description of the Triplane fighter, details are given here on all important Sopwith aircraft since very little has been published on this recently. Before Sopwith started to manufacture its own types the company had modified a Wright biplane (manufactured by the British Howard Wright) and fitted it with a 50 hp Gnome engine. Later, this was even completely rebuilt fitted with a 70 hp Gnome engine from a Blériot. Also a hybrid biplane with a closed fuselage based on the earlier Wright was built.
The first completely new design from the company was the threeseat tractor biplane of 1913 with a 80 hp Gnome engine. It featured three large celluloid windows for the two passengers sitting in front of the pilot. Three were built. Three more modified examples on floats were built, powered by a 100 hp Anzani engine.
Second type built in 1913 was a small two-seat biplane flying boat known as the Bat Boat. The first one was powered by a 6-cylinder 90 hp Austro-Daimler engine. It was soon wrecked, but another two were supplied to the British Admiralty; later to be followed by an improved amphibian version known as Bat Boat II with a 200 hp engine.
The next design was the Tabloid, a single seat high-speed biplane that became world famous when it gained, as version on floats, the 1st place at the Schneider Trophy contest of 1914 at Monaco. Pilot on this occasion was Howard Pixton who convincingly won with his 100 hp Gnome powered racer. More Tabloids were constructed as a landplane with a wheel undercarriage. The Tabloid was the first Sopwith airplane built in substantial numbers with a total of 137 manufactured in various sub types. The Tabloid was further developed into the military types Pup (originally known as ‘Scout’) and the Baby seaplane.
In approximately 1740, Cornelis Douwes presented an algorithmic method to determine the latitude when it is impossible to observe the Sun at the meridian passage. To apply Douwes’ method, it is necessary to know two altitudes of the Sun, the time elapsed between observations, the Sun's declination at the time when the greater altitude was observed and the latitude by account. Douwes’ method, originally written in Dutch, was translated and published in English by Richard Harrison in 1759. This translation made possible the dissemination of this method throughout Europe. In 1821, James Ivory proposed a new method that was independent of the latitude by account. This method was improved by Edward Riddle in 1822. Riddle's proposal was widely disseminated throughout Europe during the 19th century. In this work, our objective is to study the reliability of these two methods. For that purpose, we will apply the algorithmic methods of Douwes and Riddle to determine the latitude using real observations made during the years 2021 and 2022. The results obtained will then be compared with the GPS (Global Positioning System) latitude to assess the reliability of each method.