To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Given the ubiquity of organizational change, it is fitting that considerable research has focused on employees’ responses to change, much of it collated in review articles. With the aim of integrating this diverse review literature and providing an employee-centric theorization, we provide a meta-review, a systematic review of reviews. We present the meta-construct of employee change orientation (EChO), which aggregates employee responses, attitudes, behaviors, and the associated psychological mechanisms related to organizational change. Our meta-review includes 50 scholarly reviews published between 2001 and June 2025, drawing on 1,606 primary studies. Through a synthesis of these reviews, we present the EChO framework and taxonomy. We identify areas for improvement, particularly for research design, and generate key insights for change practitioners working with employees experiencing change. Our meta-review contributes by clarifying well-researched areas, extending theorizing, and highlighting the need for further research to understand how employee responses to change influence outcomes.
We share the world we live and die in with others, in ways that are organized and disorganized. The authors of this special issue address life-and-death as a compound term, foregrounding the vital and deadly outcomes of (dis)organization and their (business) ethics implications as they play out in the context of growing inequalities and ongoing health, geopolitical, environmental, refugee crises and egregious war crimes. Organizations and organizing can shape such contexts by engaging in the ethics of care and politics of inclusivity, redefining “essential” or “front line” work, managing relationships between bodily health and work, or ethically relating to non-human forms of life. Considering the roles of organizations in terms of life-and-death can help scholars redefine organizations and/in/for/with the world by stressing the ethical dimensions of organizing for life which involves human and other-than-human relatedness and the obligation of care for all forms of life.
We take the opportunity in this editorial that marks the end of our tenure, to offer some reflections on our experiences. It is an occasion for looking back, for reflection on the scholarship and practice of business ethics, and for celebrating some of the outstanding work that is being done in and for the journal.
In this article, we consider how zones of slow death can emerge from epistemic marginalization—specifically, the kind that occurs when a social group lacks shared interpretive models due to processes of “social descent.” Drawing on an ethnographic study of waste collectors who moved from skilled to low-skilled or unskilled labor, we explore how this epistemic marginalization is reinforced by the temporal framing of certain lives in the “past tense.” In this way, epistemic marginalization and temporal disqualification are intertwined: denying a group’s interpretive authority simultaneously enables the erasure of their claims to justice as outdated and obsolete.
We examined whether obsessive passion and harmonious passion interacted in the prediction of work–family conflict, and the indirect effects of obsessive passion on counterproductive work behaviors as mediated by work–family conflict. We collected data from two samples of employees with jobs in engineering (Sample 1) and administration (Sample 2). Obsessive passion was associated with higher levels of work–family conflict, whereas harmonious passion was negatively related to work–family conflict. Furthermore, the positive effects of obsessive passion on work–family conflict were lower at high levels of harmonious passion. Work–family conflict was also positively related to counterproductive work behaviors (Sample 2). Finally, the indirect effects of obsessive passion on counterproductive work behaviors (Sample 2) were lower at high levels of harmonious passion.
The rise of remote work has reshaped organizational dynamics, necessitating a deeper understanding of its implications for leadership, employee motivation, and performance. This longitudinal study examined direct and indirect effects (via leadership behaviors) of remote work intensity on employee motivation and performance. Using three waves of survey data from 512 Norwegian employees, results indicate that higher remote work intensity positively predicted perceived need-supportive leadership and negatively predicted perceived controlling and laissez-faire leadership. Need-supportive leadership positively predicted intrinsic motivation, which in turn predicted adaptability and proactivity, whereas controlling leadership positively predicted extrinsic regulation and amotivation. Amotivation negatively predicted proficiency but was a positive predictor of proactivity. Laissez-faire leadership also positively predicted proactivity, suggesting that reduced managerial oversight may encourage initiative in certain remote work contexts. These results offer valuable insights for organizations navigating the future of work, highlighting the need for leadership strategies that enhance intrinsic motivation and adaptability in remote work settings.
Research on the ethics of life and death in organizations has overlooked the growing role of social media in shaping the ethical implications of organizational regulations on death. More specifically, while recent research suggests that memes are increasingly used to influence the reputation and perception of organizational actions, research on their roles in legitimating the organization of death is scant. This paper analyzes Internet memes legitimizing police slaughter in Brazilian favelas. Three primary discourses were identified: denying life worthiness, establishing actors deserving death, and upholding the police organization as executioners of death. This paper contributes to research on the ethics of organizational death in three different ways in a context of political polarization and growing authoritarism. First, it discusses how social media creates a legitimate discourse that makes death visible and gloats over its victims. Second, this discourse is enabled by social media memes, which divert the ethical debate on life and death, replacing it with superficial and transient engagement. Third, we discuss how memes can reinforce the role of the state police enforcement apparatus as an expression of racialized inequalities.
Although the relevance of the dynamic nature of teams has generated a thriving literature, contributions have originated from a variety of disciplines. This situation has hindered scholarly understanding and collaboration. To assess the state of the dynamic teams’ field in an unbiased and comprehensive way, a literature review relying upon bibliometric techniques combined with content analysis was conducted. Considering all disciplines that have examined the subject, this study aimed at defining its knowledge structure, identifying its main research lines, methods, and key theoretical framework. Results revealed eight research lines. Teams/teamwork, membership change, performance, dynamic team, and membership change were found as the motor themes. In turn, decentralised control, access control, multi-robot system, and distributed system were found as themes that are either emerging or disappearing. The latter themes, related to the engineering and computing fields, are emerging and are likely to become central and developed. Future research lines are suggested.
Just like a parent, a researcher is not supposed to have ‘favourites’, but there are some people you meet over the course of a decade who you feel more intimately connected with, and whose conversations disrupt a lot of what you thought previously. Isla was one of those people. Despite having moved cities, occupations and lifestyle to work in a different sector far beyond the financial services, she was always the first to get back in touch and was one of the most enthusiastic about being re-interviewed. While our meetings involved dropping in and out of each other's lives every two years, we both enjoyed each other's company and as the years went on, our conversations became more involved about what ageing at work meant to us as women.
One evening in 2016, we met down by Southbank, close to Waterloo Station in London, for some Yum Cha. In some ways it was like a lot of the other interviews I was doing now; often in people's homes, in cafes or bars, or restaurants that were close to their large corporate offices. In comparison to the more formal settings I had been in that day, the relaxed but trendy atmosphere of the restaurant caught me off guard and I looked out of place with cut-off trousers and unstraightened hair dry shampooed into position, apologizing about clearly letting myself go, since we had last spoken. Isla smiled warmly and said: ‘People talk about letting yourself go as if it's a catastrophe. But what are we so scared [about] holding on to? There are benefits to letting yourself go.’
This is a book about how people experience ageing in the context of organizational life. Specifically, it is about how we negotiate growing up and older in highly competitive professional contexts, while attending to the quality of ageing as an embodied and situated experience. It recognizes that ageing is not a process that is incidental to how, where and when we work, and who we work with, and nor is it separate from the way we come to know ourselves as ageing subjects more generally. Rather, ageing at work should be understood as simultaneously a making of the self through the constitution of dynamic organizational subjectivities – a ‘being’ of ageing – and a ‘doing’ of ageing through particular and specific embodied acts that are shaped by the occupational and work-based contexts of our lives. In other words, working through ageing is a practical accomplishment underpinned by a particular relational and experiential organizational ontology.
Such a concern rides on a wave of political and institutional attention to age and work. Much of this has been fuelled by dual socioeconomic concerns surrounding a fear of an increasingly ‘top-heavy’ demographic, and the need to maximize labour force participation across the life course. These trends are neither universal in their intensity nor in the way they pattern across different national landscapes. However, under the banner of ageing as a ‘global challenge’, multiple governments and international agencies have invested considerable time and resources to try and establish the most effective policy interventions that encourage and enable participation in the labour market across the life course.
We’ve all used the word ‘resilient’ at one time or another to refer to family members, friends, colleagues, acquaintances or public figures who have experienced their share of life's hard knocks. This might include those who have had very difficult upbringings. Those who may be battling with personal illness. Those who have lost loved ones. Been laid off. Struggled career-wise or financially. Endured a series of bad relationships or unfortunate, even catastrophic, events.
Think of the following comment made by a work colleague in casual conversation over lunch: ‘My friend Amelia is so resilient. Despite being made redundant more than once and experiencing other personal setbacks, she's managed to run a business and raise three great kids all on her own.’ But what does it really mean to warrant this label, to be resilient like Amelia, or like Sofia, Marie, Robert, Anne, Chloe and Jacob, whose stories I captured in part at the start?
What is resilience?
George Bonanno, a leading psychologist on the topic of resilience, defines resilience as our ability as individuals, when we are experiencing a highly disruptive event, ‘to maintain relatively stable, healthy levels of psychological and physical functioning’ across time, despite transient perturbations (or in simpler terms, the occasional uneasiness), and our ‘capacity for generative experiences and positive emotions’. Resilience, therefore, is about recovering quickly and easily from stress.
On a warm summer night in August 2011, Sofia, a veteran London bar owner, peered out of the front door of her small business and gazed in horror at what she saw.
The high street was like a warzone. Everything was burning. Every single shop was smashed.
Rioting, prompted by the fatal shooting by police of a 29-year-old black man, Mark Duggan, had resulted in chaotic scenes across London. A woman jumping from a burning building and a neighbouring family business in flames would become vivid and enduring images in the media.
Most business owners had been prevented from re-entering their premises by police cordons. However, like some others, Sofia was inside her business at the time. Behind her was her teenage son and some friends. She quickly pushed the door closed and locked it.
Soon after, she heard noises on the street. The rioters were making petrol bombs. They set fire to three cars just outside Sofia's front door. A sense of dread swept over her and she switched off the lights.
We were standing there in the corridor thinking, ‘What are we going to do now? We are trapped! We can't go anywhere.’
Now, there were 300 people outside. And only moments later the door of the bar was smashed open and the angry rioters poured in.