To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In the Notes and Comments on Chapter IV (p.106), a diagram of implications between various types of spectral resolvents is given. Are there more implications? Specifically:
PROBLEM 1. Is every spectral resolvent of a given operator monotonic? Is every spectral resolvent analytically invariant?
PROBLEM 2. Is every monotonic spectral resolvent strongly monotonic? Is every monotonic spectral resolvent analytically invariant? Is every almost localized spectral resolvent a strong spectral resolvent? Is every almost localized spectral resolvent analytically invariant?
In [W.a] it was shown that there exists a complex Banach space X and an operator T ∈ B(X), which is decomposable, the adjoint T* is strongly decomposable but T is not strongly decomposable. This gives rise to
PROBLEM 3. Does it exist a complex Banach space X and a strongly decomposable T ∈ B(X), with T* decomposable but not strongly decomposable?
PROBLEM 4. Is it true that T is strongly decomposable iff T** is strongly decomposable?
In the study of operators with the SDI, Corollary 17.10 asserts that if a closed operator is endowed with the SDI then it has the SSDP. What about the converse?
Suppose that f(z) is non-constant and meromorphic in the plane and that, for some k≥= 1, a0(z),…, ak(z) are meromorphic in the plane with
for j' = 0,…, k. Here, using standard notation from [3], S(r,f) denotes any quantity satisfying S(r,f) = o(T(r,f)) as r→ ∞, possibly outside a set of finite linear measure. Then, setting
we have ([3, p. 57])
Theorem A. Suppose that f(z) is non-constant and meromorphic in the plane, and thatψ (z) given by (1.2) and (1.1) and is non-constant. Then
where N0(r, l/ψ') counts only zeros of ψ' which are not zeros of ψ − 1, and thecounting functions count points without regard to multiplicity.
The asymptotic behaviour of a sequence of polynomials cm = cm(v) satisfying
is established. These polynomials occur in Hawkins' formula for the residues of a Bessel-zeta function at its possible poles in the left half plane. The results imply that cm(v)/cm(0) converges uniformly to cos πV on compact sets. This in turn implies that, for v not a half odd integer, all but finitely many of the possible poles are actual poles.
It is proved that the sequence is completely uniformly distributed modulo 1 for almost all real numbers x with |x|> 1, if (an) is an arbitrary sequence of distinct positive integers.
Some interlacing properties of the zeros of the generalized Airy functions A1(z, p) are given for non-positive integral values of p. The result that A1 (z,p) has no real zero for is extended to show that all the zeros of A1(z,p) are real and simple if . It is also shown that all the zeros of the functions Bk(z,p, 1) for k = 1, 2, 3 are simple for non-positive integral p.
In this paper we study certain properties of free actions of non-abelian p-groups (p≥3) on products of spheres (Sn)k, k≥2. The following theorems are proved.
A basic notion in the classical theory of differentiation is that of a differentiation base. However, some differentiation type theorems only require the less restricted notion of a contraction. We demonstrate that the classical criteria, such as the covering criteria of de Possel, continue to hold in the new setting.