To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
By a ‘representation’ we shall mean throughout a representation by n × n matrices with entries from an arbitrary field. Elsewhere [9] the author has introduced the concept of a principal representation of a semigroup S (see § 3 below for the definition) and has shown that if S satisfies the minimal condition on principal ideals then every irreducible representation is of this type. Moreover, if S satisfies the minimal conditions on both principal left and right ideals, which together imply the minimal condition on principal two-sided ideals [6, Theorem 4], the irreducible representations of S can ultimately be expressed explicitly in terms of group representations.
In [1, p. 97], Bruck and Bose ask the question ”Has every (right) Veblen-Wedderburn system finite dimension over its left operator skew-field?” It is the purpose of this note to show that, in general, this question has a negative answer.
An infinite or semi-infinite medium, in which heat is generated or absorbed at a rate proportional to the temperature, is placed at temperature zero in contact with a perfect conductor of finite heat capacity at a higher temperature. Expressions are derived for the subsequent behaviour in linear and spherical cases, and applications suggested.
For each natural number n, let un(x)=(1—cos nx)/πnx2(xɛℝ). It is well–known that a bounded continuous function f on the real line ℝ is the Fourier transform of an integrable function on ℝ if and only if the functions Φn(f) (n= 1, 2,…), defined by
form a Cauchy sequence in the space L1(ℝ) (cf. [2]). Such a characterization, which can be extended to functions defined on a locally compact Abelian group more general than ℝ, is based on the fact that the space L1(ℝ) is complete with respect to convergence in mean.
Let E be a Hausdorff locally convex space with continuous dual E1 and let M be a subspace of the algebraic dual E* such that M ∩ E1 = {0} and dim M = ℵ0. In the terminology of [4] the Mackey topology τ(E, E1 + M) is called a countable enlargement of τ(E, E1). There has been some interest in the question of when barrelledness is preserved under countable enlargements (see [4], [5], [6], [8], [9]). In this note we are concerned with the preservation of the quasidistinguished property for normed spaces under countable enlargements; this was posed as on open question by B. Tsirulnikov in [7]. According to [7] a Hausdorff locally convex space E is quasidistinguished if every bounded subset of its completion Ê is contained in the completion of a bounded subset of Ê (equivalently, in the closure in Ê of a bounded subset of E). Any normed space is clearly quasidistinguished and remains so under a finite enlargement (dim M < χ0) since the enlarged topology is normable. (See the Main Theorem of [7] for a general result on the preservation of the quasidistinguished property under finite enlargements.) We shall write QDCE for a countable enlargement which preserves the quasidistinguished property.
In [6] B. H. Neumann proved the following beautiful result: if a group G is covered by finitely many cosets, say G = xiHi, then we can omit from the union any xiHi, for which |G|Hj| is infinite. In particular, |G:Hj| is finite, for some j ∈ {l,…,n}.
In an unpublished result R. Baer characterized the groups covered by finitely many abelian subgroups, they are exactly the centre-by-finite groups [8]. Coverings by nilpotent subgroups or by Engel subgroups and by normal subgroups have been studied, for example, by R. Baer (see [8]), L. C. Kappe [2,1], M. A. Brodie and R. F. Chamberlain [1], and recently by M. J. Tomkinson [9].
where l, m, n. are any numbers real or complex and R(b)>0. A similar result, involving Bessel Functions of the First Kind, was obtained by Hanumanta Rao [Mess, of Maths., XLVII. (1918), pp. 134–137].
A cardinal number which is too large to be reached by some process is generally said to be inaccessible by that process. Many kinds of inaccessible cardinals have been discussed and for a general survey the book of H. Bachmann [1, Chapter 7] may be consulted. We consider here two inaccessibility properties. We shall denote the cardinal of a set X by |X|. The first inaccessibility property will be called regularity: the cardinal| X| will be said to be regular if there does not exist a disjoint cover {X1: i ε I} of X such that
The study of bounded distributive lattices endowed with an additional dual homomorphic operation began with a paper by J. Berman [3]. On the one hand, this class of algebras simultaneously abstracts de Morgan algebras and Stone algebras while, on the other hand, it has relevance to propositional logics lacking both the paradoxes of material implication and the law of double negation. Subsequently, these algebras were baptized distributive Ockham lattices and an order-topological duality theory for them was developed by A. Urquhart [13]. In an elegant paper [9], M. S. Goldberg extended this theory and, amongst other things, described the free algebras and the injective algebras in those subvarieties of the variety 0 of distributive Ockham algebras which are generated by a single finite subdirectly irreducible algebra. Recently, T. S. Blyth and J. C. Varlet [4] explicitly described the subdirectly irreducible algebras in a small subvariety MS of 0 while in [2] the order-topological results of Goldberg were applied to accomplish the same objective for a subvariety k1.1 of 0 which properly contains MS. The aim, here, is to describe explicitly the injective algebras in each of the subvarieties of the variety MS. The first step is to draw the Hasse diagram of the lattice AMS of subvarieties of MS. Next, the results of Goldberg are applied to describe the injectives in each of the join irreducible members of AMS. Finally, this information, in conjunction with universal algebraic results due to B. Davey and H. Werner [8], is applied to give an explicit description of the injectives in each of the join reducible members of AMS.
G. Lallement [4] has shown that the lattice of congruences, Λ(S), on a completely 0-simple semigroup S is semimodular, thus improving G. B. Preston's result [5] that such a lattice satisfies the Jordan-Dedekind chain condition. More recently, J. M. Howie [2] has given a new and more simple proof of Lallement's result using work due to Tamura [9]. The purpose of this note is to extend the semimodularity result to primitive regular semigroups, to establish a theorem relating certain congruence and quotient lattices, and to provide a theorem for congruences on any regular semigroup.
This brief note has the threefold purpose of improving on an earlier theorem of the author [4], gathering together some results on normal closures (with rank restrictions) which are more or less implicit in the literature and providing a few examples which indicate the impossibility of improving these results in one way or another. The proofs are mostly routine and usually omitted. Most of the relevant background material can be found in [3], and references to these results will often indicate that minoradditional details (an easy induction, for example) are required. Throughout, 〈x〉G will denote the normal closure of the subgroup 〈x〉 of the group G. The usual notation is used for upper central and derived series.
We study the Dehn functions of the fundamental groups of complexes of groups. We study a function known as the Howie function, which has a natural geometric formulation. We make use of the Howie function to obtain an upper bound for the Dehn function of the complex of groups. And we show a connection between the Howie function and actions on complexes.
In his celebrated paper [3] Gaschiitz proved that any finite non-cyclic p-group always admits non-inner automorphisms of order a power of p. In particular this implies that, if G is a finite nilpotent group of order bigger than 2, then Out (G) = Aut(G)/Inn(G) =≠1. Here, as usual, we denote by Aut (G) the full group of automorphisms of G while Inn (G) stands for the group of inner automorphisms, that is automorphisms induced by conjugation by elements of G. After Gaschiitz proved this result, the following question was raised: “if G is an infinite nilpotent group, is it always true that Out (G)≠1?”
This note discusses the determination of the coefficients an in the dual trigonometrical series
where p = ± 1 and F(x), G(x) are prescribed functions of X. It is shown that this problem and the corresponding one in which the sines in equations (1) are replaced by cosines are easily reduced to a form in which the results I have recently given in this journal [1] may be applied.
As with my previous paper on this subject, the analysis is purely formal and no attempt is made to give precise conditions for which the solution is valid.
Arrange any n integers around a circle. The following procedure can be used to obtain another circle of n integers. For each adjacent pair of the first integers, form the absolute value of their difference and place it between them; then remove the original numbers. This procedure can be repeated over and over. When n = 4 this always leads eventually to a circle of zeros. On the other hand when n = 3, unless the original numbers are equal, this never happens. We treat below the general case and related problems, using for convenience a slightly different formulation. Surprisingly there is enough structure to lead to some interesting mathematics.
The purpose of this paper is to study the following two questions.
(1) When does the group algebra of a soluble group have infinite dimensional irreducible modules?
(2) When is the group algebra of a torsion free soluble group primitive?
In relation to the first question, Roseblade [13] has proved that if G is a polycyclic group and k an absolute field then all irreducible kG-modules are finite dimensional. Here we prove a converse.
One of the most important results of operator theory is the spectral theorem for normal operators. This states that a normal operator (that is, a Hilbert space operator T such that T*T= TT*), can be represented as an integral with respect to a countably additive spectral measure,
Here E is a measure that associates an orthogonal projection with each Borel subset of ℂ. The countable additivity of this measure means that if x Eℋ can be written as a sum of eigenvectors then this sum must converge unconditionally.
Let {Ui, Uij} be an inductive system of normed linear spaces Ui and continuous linear maps uij; Uj → Ui. (We write j ≺ i if uij: Uj → Ui.) An inductive limit of the system with respect to a class of spaces A in and maps f in is a space Uu in Uu and a system ui → Uu of maps in such that (i) whenever j ≺ i, and that (ii) if A is any space in and fi: Ui → A is any system of maps in for which then there is a unique map f: Uu → A in such that fi = fo ui for each i. If is the class of all vector spaces and is the class of linear maps, we obtain the algebraic inductive limit, which we denote simply by U. The usual choice is to take to be the class of locally convex spaces and the class of continuous linear maps; the inductive limit UL then always exists [1, § 16 C]. If is again the continuous linear mappings but contains only normed spaces, the corresponding inductive limit UN may not always exist. However, if in addition we require that contains just contractions (norm-decreasing linear mappings), then an inductive limit Uc will exist if every uij is a contraction [2]. We shall give a condition under which these limits coincide (as far as possible), and consider the corresponding condition for projective limits.