To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
It is proved that the resolvent norm of an operator with a compact resolvent on a Banach space $X$ cannot be constant on an open set if the underlying space or its dual is complex strictly convex. It is also shown that this is not the case for an arbitrary Banach space: there exists a separable, reflexive space $X$ and an unbounded, densely defined operator acting in $X$ with a compact resolvent whose norm is constant in a neighbourhood of zero; moreover $X$ is isometric to a Hilbert space on a subspace of co-dimension $2$. There is also a bounded linear operator acting on the same space whose resolvent norm is constant in a neighbourhood of zero. It is shown that similar examples cannot exist in the co-dimension $1$ case.
This book is essentially a text book that introduces the geometrical objects which arise in the study of vector spaces over finite fields. It advances rapidly through the basic material, enabling the reader to consider the more interesting aspects of the subject without having to labour excessively. There are over a hundred exercises which contain a lot of content not included in the text. This should be taken into consideration and even though one may not wish to try to solve the exercises themselves, they should not be ignored. There are detailed solutions provided to all the exercises.
The first four chapters treat the algebraic and geometric aspects of finite vector spaces. The following three chapters consist of combinatorial applications. There is a chapter containing a brief treatment of applications to groups, real geometry, codes, graphs, designs and permutation polynomials. Then there is a chapter that gives a more in-depth treatment of applications to extremal graph theory, specifically the forbidden subgraph problem, and then a chapter on maximum distance separable codes.
This book is self-contained in the sense that any theorem or lemma which is subsequently used is proven. The only exceptions to this are Bombieri's theorem and the Huxely–Iwaniec theorem concerning the distribution of primes, which are used in the chapter on the forbidden subgraph problem, the Hasse– Weil theorem, which is used to bound the number of points on a plane algebraic curve at the end of the chapter on maximum distance separable codes, and Hilbert's Nullstellensatz, which is used in the appendix on commutative algebra. Although there are almost no prerequisites, it would be helpful to have studied previously some basic algebra and linear algebra, since otherwise the first couple of chapters may appear somewhat brief. There are some theorems that are quoted without proof, but in all cases these appear at the end of some branch and are not built upon.
In this chapter the basic algebraic objects of a group, a ring and a field are defined. It is shown that a finite field has q elements, where q is a prime power, and that there is a unique field with q elements. We define an automorphism of a field and introduce the associated trace and norm functions. Some lemmas related to these functions are proven in the case that the field is finite. Finally, some additional results on fields are proven which will be needed in the subsequent chapters.
Rings and fields
A group G is a set with a binary operation ◦ which is associative ((a ◦ b) ◦ c = a ◦ (b ◦ c)), has an identity element e (a ◦ e = e ◦ a = a) and for which every element of G has an inverse (for all a, there is a b such that a ◦ b = b ◦ a = e). A group is abelian if the binary operation is commutative (a ◦ b = b ◦ a).
A commutative ring R is a set with two binary operations, addition and multiplication, such that it is an abelian group with respect to addition with identity element 0, and multiplication is commutative, associative and distributive (a(b + c) = ab + ac) and has an identity element 1.
The set of integers ℤ is an example of a commutative ring.
An ideal a of a ring R is an additive subgroup with the property that ra ∈ a for all r ∈ R and a ∈ a. For example, the multiples of an element r ∈ R form an ideal, which is denoted by (r).
A coset of a is a set r + a = {r + a | a ∈ a}, for some r ∈ R.
Let $K$ be a convex body in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ which slides freely in a ball. Let $K^{(n)}$ denote the intersection of $n$ closed half-spaces containing $K$ whose bounding hyperplanes are independent and identically distributed according to a certain prescribed probability distribution. We prove an asymptotic formula for the expectation of the difference of the volumes of $K^{(n)}$ and $K$, and an asymptotic upper bound on the variance of the volume of $K^{(n)}$. We obtain these asymptotic formulas by proving results for weighted mean width approximations of convex bodies that admit a rolling ball by inscribed random polytopes and then using polar duality to convert them into statements about circumscribed random polytopes.
The approximation constant ${\it\lambda}_{k}({\it\zeta})$ is defined as the supremum of ${\it\eta}\in \mathbb{R}$ such that the estimate $\max _{1\leqslant j\leqslant k}\Vert {\it\zeta}^{j}x\Vert \leqslant x^{-{\it\eta}}$ has infinitely many integer solutions $x$. Here $\Vert .\Vert$ denotes the distance to the closest integer. We establish a connection on the joint spectrum $({\it\lambda}_{1}({\it\zeta}),{\it\lambda}_{2}({\it\zeta}),\ldots )$, which will lead to various improvements of known results on the individual spectrum of the approximation constants ${\it\lambda}_{k}({\it\zeta})$ as well. In particular, for given $k\geqslant 1$ and ${\it\lambda}\geqslant 1$, we construct ${\it\zeta}$ in the Cantor set with ${\it\lambda}_{k}({\it\zeta})={\it\lambda}$. Moreover, we establish an estimate for the uniform approximation constants $\widehat{{\it\lambda}}_{k}({\it\zeta})$, which enables us to determine classical approximation constants for Liouville numbers.
We consider large random graphs with prescribed degrees, as generated by the configuration model. In the regime where the empirical degree distribution approaches a limit μ with finite mean, we establish the systematic convergence of a broad class of graph parameters that includes the independence number, the maximum cut size, the logarithm of the Tutte polynomial, and the free energy of the anti-ferromagnetic Ising and Potts models. Contrary to previous works, our results are not a priori limited to the free energy of some prescribed graphical model. They apply more generally to any additive, Lipschitz and concave graph parameter. In addition, the corresponding limits are shown to be Lipschitz and concave in the degree distribution μ. This considerably extends the applicability of the celebrated interpolation method, introduced in the context of spin glasses, and recently related to the challenging question of right-convergence of sparse graphs.
In a recent important paper, Hoffstein and Hulse [Multiple Dirichlet series and shifted convolutions, arXiv:1110.4868v2] generalized the notion of Rankin–Selberg convolution $L$-functions by defining shifted convolution$L$-functions. We investigate symmetrized versions of their functions, and we prove that the generating functions of certain special values are linear combinations of weakly holomorphic quasimodular forms and “mixed mock modular” forms.
This special issue is devoted to papers from the meeting on Combinatorics and Probability, held at the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut in Oberwolfach from the 14th to 20th April 2013. The lectures at this meeting focused on the common themes of Combinatorics and Discrete Probability, with many of the problems studied originating in Theoretical Computer Science. The lectures, many of which were given by young participants, stimulated fruitful discussions. The fact that the participants work in different and yet related topics, and the open problems session held during the meeting, encouraged interesting discussions and collaborations.
The isotropic constant $L_{K}$ is an affine-invariant measure of the spread of a convex body $K$. For a $d$-dimensional convex body $K$, $L_{K}$ can be defined by $L_{K}^{2d}=\det (A(K))/(\text{vol}(K))^{2}$, where $A(K)$ is the covariance matrix of the uniform distribution on $K$. It is an open problem to find a tight asymptotic upper bound of the isotropic constant as a function of the dimension. It has been conjectured that there is a universal constant upper bound. The conjecture is known to be true for several families of bodies, in particular, highly symmetric bodies such as bodies having an unconditional basis. It is also known that maximizers cannot be smooth. In this work we study bodies that are neither smooth nor highly symmetric by showing progress towards reducing to a highly symmetric case among non-smooth bodies. More precisely, we study the set of maximizers among simplicial polytopes and we show that if a simplicial polytope $K$ is a maximizer of the isotropic constant among $d$-dimensional convex bodies, then when $K$ is put in isotropic position it is symmetric around any hyperplane spanned by a $(d-2)$-dimensional face and the origin. By a result of Campi, Colesanti and Gronchi, this implies that a simplicial polytope that maximizes the isotropic constant must be a simplex.
Let $\mathbb{A}=(A,+)$ be a (possibly non-commutative) semigroup. For $Z\subseteq A$, we define $Z^{\times }:=Z\cap \mathbb{A}^{\times }$, where $\mathbb{A}^{\times }$ is the set of the units of $\mathbb{A}$ and
The paper investigates some properties of ${\it\gamma}(\cdot )$ and shows the following extension of the Cauchy–Davenport theorem: if $\mathbb{A}$ is cancellative and $X,Y\subseteq A$, then
This implies a generalization of Kemperman’s inequality for torsion-free groups and strengthens another extension of the Cauchy–Davenport theorem, where $\mathbb{A}$ is a group and ${\it\gamma}(X+Y)$ in the above is replaced by the infimum of $|S|$ as $S$ ranges over the non-trivial subgroups of $\mathbb{A}$ (Hamidoune–Károlyi theorem).
Developments in graph colouring theory were motivated by the four-colour problem and Heawood's theorem. Both of these were originally formulated as map-colouring problems that can be expressed as colouring graphs embedded on surfaces. This chapter gives an overview of the abundance of results concerning the chromatic number of graphs that are embedded on surfaces.
Introduction
In 1852 Francis Guthrie asked whether the regions of every planar map can be coloured with four colours in such a way that no two regions of the map with common boundary receive the same colour. In effect, by duality Guthrie was asking whether every planar graph is 4-colourable. This easily stated problem became known as the famous four-colour problem. Attempts to solve it led to many important results in graph theory, but the problem itself remained unsolved for more than a century. It was finally answered in the positive by Appel and Haken [9], [10], [12]. More about its proof comes later in this chapter.
For more than a century, the four-colour problem was one of the driving forces that led to developments in graph theory, and specifically graph colouring theory. Its generalization – the Heawood problem – was the main motivation for developments in topological graph theory (see [51] or [49]). Both of these were originally formulated as map-colouring problems, asking about colouring the faces of an embedded graph so that adjacent faces receive different colours. Every map-colouring problem can be expressed as a graph-colouring problem by considering the dual graph of the map. Its vertices correspond to the faces of the map, and two vertices are adjacent if the corresponding faces are adjacent on the surface.
In this chapter we discuss the colouring of graphs embedded on surfaces. We start by describing some of the ideas in the proof of the four-colour theorem and give a proof of the list-colouring version of the five-colour theorem that is due to Thomassen.
We discuss the colouring theory of finite set systems. This is not merely an extension of results from collections of 2-element sets (graphs) to larger sets. The wider structure (hypergraphs) offers many interesting new kinds of problems, which either have no analogues in graph theory or become trivial when we restrict them to graphs.
Introduction
In this introductory section we give the most important definitions required to study hypergraph colouring, and briefly survey the half-century history of this topic. For more details on the material of Sections 1 and 2 we refer to Berge [8], Zykov [76] and Duchet [27].
Let V = {v1, v2, …, vn} be a finite set of elements called vertices, and let ℇ = {E1, E2, …, Em} be a family of subsets of V called edges or hyperedges. The pair ℌ = (V, ℇ) is called a hypergraph with vertex-set V = V(ℌ) and edge-set ℇ = ℇ(ℌ). The hypergraph ℌ = (V, ℇ) is sometimes called a set system. If each edge of a hypergraph contains precisely two vertices, then it is a graph. As in graph theory, the number |V| = n is called the order of the hypergraph. Edges with fewer than two elements are usually allowed, but will be disregarded here. Thus, throughout this chapter we assume that each edge E ∈ ℇ contains at least two vertices, unless stated explicitly otherwise. Edges that coincide are called multiple edges.
In a hypergraph, two vertices are said to be adjacent if there is an edge containing both of these vertices. The adjacent vertices are sometimes called neighbours of each other, and the set of neighbours of a given vertex v is called the (open) neighbourhood N(v) of v. If v ∈ E, then the vertex v and the edge E are incident with each other. For an edge E, the number |E| is called the size or cardinality of E.