For cardinals $\mathfrak {a}$ and $\mathfrak {b}$, we write $\mathfrak {a}=^\ast \mathfrak {b}$ if there are sets A and B of cardinalities $\mathfrak {a}$ and $\mathfrak {b}$, respectively, such that there are partial surjections from A onto B and from B onto A. $=^\ast $-equivalence classes are called surjective cardinals. In this article, we show that $\mathsf {ZF}+\mathsf {DC}_\kappa $, where $\kappa $ is a fixed aleph, cannot prove that surjective cardinals form a cardinal algebra, which gives a negative solution to a question proposed by Truss [J. Truss, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 27, 165–207 (1984)]. Nevertheless, we show that surjective cardinals form a “surjective cardinal algebra”, whose postulates are almost the same as those of a cardinal algebra, except that the refinement postulate is replaced by the finite refinement postulate. This yields a smoother proof of the cancellation law for surjective cardinals, which states that $m\cdot \mathfrak {a}=^\ast m\cdot \mathfrak {b}$ implies $\mathfrak {a}=^\ast \mathfrak {b}$ for all cardinals $\mathfrak {a},\mathfrak {b}$ and all nonzero natural numbers m.

We show, assuming PD, that every complete finitely axiomatized second-order theory with a countable model is categorical, but that there is, assuming again PD, a complete recursively axiomatized second-order theory with a countable model which is non-categorical. We show that the existence of even very large (e.g., supercompact) cardinals does not imply the categoricity of all finitely axiomatizable complete second-order theories. More exactly, we show that a non-categorical complete finitely axiomatized second-order theory can always be obtained by (set) forcing. We also show that the categoricity of all finite complete second-order theories with a model of a certain singular cardinality $\kappa $ of uncountable cofinality can be forced over any model of set theory. Previously, Solovay had proved, assuming $V=L$, that every complete finitely axiomatized second-order theory (with or without a countable model) is categorical, and that in a generic extension of L there is a complete finitely axiomatized second-order theory with a countable model which is non-categorical.

We prove that every $\Sigma ^0_2$ Gale-Stewart game can be won via a winning strategy $\tau $ which is $\Delta _1$-definable over $L_{\delta }$, the $\delta $th stage of Gödel’s constructible universe, where $\delta = \delta _{\sigma ^1_1}$, strengthening a theorem of Solovay from the 1970s. Moreover, the bound is sharp in the sense that there is a $\Sigma ^0_2$ game with no strategy $\tau $ which is witnessed to be winning by an element of $L_{\delta }$.

We prove a rigidity result for maps between Čech–Stone remainders under fairly mild forcing axioms.

Can we quantify over absolutely every set? Absolutists typically affirm, while relativists typically deny, the possibility of unrestricted quantification (in set theory). In the first part of this article, I develop a novel and intermediate philosophical position in the absolutism versus relativism debate in set theory. In a nutshell, the idea is that problematic sentences related to paradoxes cannot be interpreted with unrestricted quantifier domains, while prima facie absolutist sentences (e.g., “no set is contained in the empty set”) are unproblematic in this respect and can be interpreted over a domain containing all sets. In the second part of the paper, I develop a semantic theory that can implement the intermediate position. The resulting framework allows us to distinguish between inherently absolutist and inherently relativist sentences of the language of set theory.

The Fregean ontology can be naturally interpreted within set theory with urelements, where objects correspond to sets and urelements, and concepts to classes. Consequently, Fregean abstraction principles can be formulated as set-theoretic principles. We investigate how the size of reality—i.e., the number of urelements—interacts with these principles. We show that Basic Law V implies that for some well-ordered cardinal $\kappa $, there is no set of urelements of size $\kappa $. Building on recent work by Hamkins [10], we show that, under certain additional axioms, Basic Law V holds if and only if the urelements form a set. We construct models of urelement set theory in which the Reflection Principle holds while Hume’s Principle fails for sets. Additionally, assuming the consistency of an inaccessible cardinal, we produce a model of Kelley–Morse class theory with urelements that has a global well-ordering but lacks a definable map satisfying Hume’s Principle for classes.

Let $\Gamma $ be a compact Polish group of finite topological dimension. For a countably infinite subset $S\subseteq \Gamma $, a domatic $\aleph _0$-partition (for its Schreier graph on $\Gamma $) is a partial function $f:\Gamma \rightharpoonup \mathbb {N}$ such that for every $x\in \Gamma $, one has $f[S\cdot x]=\mathbb {N}$. We show that a continuous domatic $\aleph _0$-partition exists, if and only if a Baire measurable domatic $\aleph _0$-partition exists, if and only if the topological closure of S is uncountable. A Haar measurable domatic $\aleph _0$-partition exists for all choices of S. We also investigate domatic partitions in the general descriptive graph combinatorial setting.

Denote by $\mathcal {NA}$ and $\mathcal {MA}$ the ideals of null-additive and meager-additive subsets of $2^{\omega }$, respectively. We prove in ZFC that $\mathrm {add}(\mathcal {NA})=\mathrm {non}(\mathcal {NA})$ and introduce a new (Polish) relational system to reformulate Bartoszyński’s and Judah’s characterization of the uniformity of $\mathcal {MA}$, which is helpful to understand the combinatorics of $\mathcal {MA}$ and to prove consistency results. As for the latter, we prove that $\mathrm {cov}(\mathcal {MA})<\mathfrak {c}$ (even $\mathrm {cov}(\mathcal {MA})<\mathrm {non}(\mathcal {N})$) is consistent with ZFC, as well as several constellations of Cichoń’s diagram with $\mathrm {non}(\mathcal {NA})$, $\mathrm {non}(\mathcal {MA}),$ and $\mathrm {add}(\mathcal {SN})$, which include $\mathrm {non}(\mathcal {NA})<\mathfrak {b}< \mathrm {non}(\mathcal {MA})$ and $\mathfrak {b}< \mathrm {add}(\mathcal {SN})<\mathrm {cov}(\mathcal {M})<\mathfrak {d}=\mathfrak {c}$.

We study a family of variants of Jensen’s subcomplete forcing axiom, $\mathsf {SCFA,}$ and subproper forcing axiom, $\mathsf {SubPFA}$. Using these, we develop a general technique for proving nonimplications of $\mathsf {SCFA}$, $\mathsf {SubPFA}$ and their relatives and give several applications. For instance, we show that $\mathsf {SCFA}$ does not imply $\mathsf {MA}^+(\sigma $-closed) and $\mathsf {SubPFA}$ does not imply Martin’s Maximum.

Following [1], given cardinals $\kappa <\lambda $, we say $\kappa $ is a club $\lambda $-Berkeley cardinal if for every transitive set N of size $<\lambda $ such that $\kappa \subseteq N$, there is a club $C\subseteq \kappa $ with the property that for every $\eta \in C$, there is an elementary embedding $j: N\rightarrow N$ with $\mathrm {crit }(j)=\eta $. We say $\kappa $ is $\nu $-club $\lambda $-Berkeley if $C\subseteq \kappa $ as above is a $\nu $-club. We say $\kappa $ is $\lambda $-Berkeley if C is unbounded in $\kappa $. We show that under $\textsf {AD}^{+}$, (1) every regular Suslin cardinal is $\omega $-club $\Theta $-Berkeley (see Theorem 7.1), (2) $\omega _1$ is club $\Theta $-Berkeley (see Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 7.1), and (3) the ’s are $\Theta $-Berkeley – in particular, $\omega _2$ is $\Theta $-Berkeley (see Remark 7.5).

Along the way, we represent regular Suslin cardinals in direct limits as cutpoint cardinals (see Theorem 5.1). This topic has been studied in [31] and [4], albeit from a different point of view. We also show that, assuming $V=L({\mathbb {R}})+{\textsf {AD}}$, $\omega _1$ is not $\Theta ^+$-Berkeley, so the result stated in the title is optimal (see Theorem 9.14 and Theorem 9.19).

We prove two compactness theorems for HOD. First, if $\kappa $ is a strong limit singular cardinal with uncountable cofinality and for stationarily many $\delta <\kappa $, $(\delta ^+)^{\mathrm {HOD}}=\delta ^+$, then $(\kappa ^+)^{\mathrm {HOD}}=\kappa ^+$. Second, if $\kappa $ is a singular cardinal with uncountable cofinality and stationarily many $\delta <\kappa $ are singular in $\operatorname {\mathrm {HOD}}$, then $\kappa $ is singular in $\operatorname {\mathrm {HOD}}$. We also discuss the optimality of these results and show that the first theorem does not extend from $\operatorname {\mathrm {HOD}}$ to other $\omega $-club amenable inner models.

The consistency of the theory $\mathsf {ZF} + \mathsf {AD}_{\mathbb {R}} + {}$‘every set of reals is universally Baire’ is proved relative to $\mathsf {ZFC} + {}$‘there is a cardinal that is a limit of Woodin cardinals and of strong cardinals’. The proof is based on the derived model construction, which was used by Woodin to show that the theory $\mathsf {ZF} + \mathsf {AD}_{\mathbb {R}} + {}$‘every set of reals is Suslin’ is consistent relative to $\mathsf {ZFC} + {}$‘there is a cardinal $\lambda $ that is a limit of Woodin cardinals and of $\mathord {<}\lambda $-strong cardinals’. The $\Sigma ^2_1$ reflection property of our model is proved using genericity iterations as in Neeman [18] and Steel [22].

Assuming the Generalized Continuum hypothesis, this paper answers the question: when is the tensor product of two ultrafilters equal to their Cartesian product? It is necessary and sufficient that their Cartesian product is an ultrafilter; that the two ultrafilters commute in the tensor product; that for all cardinals $\lambda $, one of the ultrafilters is both $\lambda $-indecomposable and $\lambda ^+$-indecomposable; that the ultrapower embedding associated with each ultrafilter restricts to a definable embedding of the ultrapower of the universe associated with the other.

In 1967, Gerencsér and Gyárfás [16] proved a result which is considered the starting point of graph-Ramsey theory: In every 2-coloring of $K_n$, there is a monochromatic path on $\lceil (2n+1)/3\rceil $ vertices, and this is best possible. There have since been hundreds of papers on graph-Ramsey theory with some of the most important results being motivated by a series of conjectures of Burr and Erdős [2, 3] regarding the Ramsey numbers of trees (settled in [31]), graphs with bounded maximum degree (settled in [5]), and graphs with bounded degeneracy (settled in [23]).

In 1993, Erdős and Galvin [13] began the investigation of a countably infinite analogue of the Gerencsér and Gyárfás result: What is the largest d such that in every $2$-coloring of $K_{\mathbb {N}}$ there is a monochromatic infinite path with upper density at least d? Erdős and Galvin showed that $2/3\leq d\leq 8/9$, and after a series of recent improvements, this problem was finally solved in [7] where it was shown that $d={(12+\sqrt {8})}/{17}$.

This paper begins a systematic study of quantitative countably infinite graph-Ramsey theory, focusing on infinite analogues of the Burr-Erdős conjectures. We obtain some results which are analogous to what is known in finite case, and other (unexpected) results which have no analogue in the finite case.

We present a counterexample to [Kan08, Conjecture 14.1.6], regarding Borel equivalence relations on product spaces.

It is shown that if $\{H_n\}_{n \in \omega}$ is a sequence of groups without involutions, with $1 \lt |H_n| \leq 2^{\aleph_0}$, then the topologist’s product modulo the finite words is (up to isomorphism) independent of the choice of sequence. This contrasts with the abelian setting: if $\{A_n\}_{n \in \omega}$ is a sequence of countably infinite torsion-free abelian groups, then the isomorphism class of the product modulo sum $\prod_{n \in \omega} A_n/\bigoplus_{n \in \omega} A_n$ is dependent on the sequence.

We produce, relative to a $\textsf {ZFC}$ model with a supercompact cardinal, a $\textsf {ZFC}$ model of the Proper Forcing Axiom in which the nonstationary ideal on $\omega _1$ is $\Pi _1$-definable in a parameter from $H_{\aleph _2}$.

We define several notions of a limit point on sequences with domain a barrier in $[\omega ]^{<\omega }$ focusing on the two dimensional case $[\omega ]^2$. By exploring some natural candidates, we show that countable compactness has a number of generalizations in terms of limits of high dimensional sequences and define a particular notion of $\alpha $-countable compactness for $\alpha \leq \omega _1$. We then focus on dimension 2 and compare 2-countable compactness with notions previously studied in the literature. We present a number of counterexamples showing that these classes are different. In particular assuming the existence of a Ramsey ultrafilter, a subspace of $\beta \omega $ which is doubly countably compact whose square is not countably compact, answering a question of T. Banakh, S. Dimitrova, and O. Gutik [3]. The analysis of this construction leads to some possibly new types of ultrafilters related to discrete, P-points and Ramsey ultrafilters.

It is consistent relative to an inaccessible cardinal that ZF+DC holds, the hypergraph of equilateral triangles on a given Euclidean space has countable chromatic number, while the hypergraph of isosceles triangles on $\mathbb {R}^2$ does not.

We study the descriptive complexity of sets of points defined by restricting the statistical behaviour of their orbits in dynamical systems on Polish spaces. Particular examples of such sets are the sets of generic points of invariant Borel probability measures, but we also consider much more general sets (for example, $\alpha $-Birkhoff regular sets and the irregular set appearing in the multifractal analysis of ergodic averages of a continuous real-valued function). We show that many of these sets are Borel in general, and all these are Borel when we assume that our space is compact. We provide examples of these sets being non-Borel, properly placed at the first level of the projective hierarchy (they are complete analytic or co-analytic). This proves that the compactness assumption is, in some cases, necessary to obtain Borelness. When these sets are Borel, we measure their descriptive complexity using the Borel hierarchy. We show that the sets of interest are located at most at the third level of the hierarchy. We also use a modified version of the specification property to show that these sets are properly located at the third level of the hierarchy for many dynamical systems. To demonstrate that the specification property is a sufficient, but not necessary, condition for maximal descriptive complexity of a set of generic points, we provide an example of a compact minimal system with an invariant measure whose set of generic points is $\boldsymbol {\Pi }^0_3$-complete.