Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T13:46:08.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responsibility: Cognitive fragments and collaborative coherence?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

James S. Uleman ,
Yael Granot  and
Yuki Shimizu
James S. Uleman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003. jim.uleman@nyu.edu jimuleman.com psych.nyu.edu/Uleman
Yael Granot
Affiliation:
Yale Law School, New Haven, CT 06520. yael.granot@yale.edu
Yuki Shimizu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama Prefecture 338-8570, Japan. shimizu@mail.saitama-u.ac.jp http://en.saitama-u.ac.jp/research/researchers/dr-yuki-shimizu/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe additional research that expands upon many of Doris's points, focusing on collaboration (Ch. 5), selves, and identity (Ch. 8). We also suggest some elaboration of his treatment of dual process theories (Ch. 3). Finally, we ask whether collaborationist accounts confer logical consistency.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e60
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bargh, J. A. (1994) The Four Horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, efficiency, intention, and control in social cognition. In: Handbook of social cognition, 2nd edition, ed. Wyer, R. S. Jr. & Srull, T. K., pp. 1–40. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, J., Liberman, N. & Friedman, R. S. (2009) What do we prime? On distinguishing between semantic priming, procedural priming, and goal priming. In: The Oxford handbook of human action, ed. Morsella, E., Bargh, J. A. & Gollwitzer, P. M., pp. 173–93. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Granot, Y., Balcetis, E., Schneider, K. E. & Tyler, T. R. (2014) Justice is not blind: Visual attention exaggerates effects of group identification on legal punishment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143:2196–208. doi:10.1037/a0037893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granot, Y., Uleman, J. S. & Balcetis, E. (under review) The “I” in victim: Just world beliefs and self-relevance as necessary conditions for victim blame. New York University.Google Scholar
Haan, N. (1978) Two moralities in action contexts: Relationships to thought, ego regulation, and development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(3):286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, J. & Van den Bos, K. (2008) Not fair for me! The influence of personal relevance on social justice inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44:699–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassin, R. R., Ochsner, K. N. & Trope, Y., eds. (2010) Self-control in society, mind, and brain (Social cognition and social neuroscience). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hong, Y-y., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C-y. & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000) Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist 55(7):709–20. doi: l0.l037//0003-066X.55.7.709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacoby, L. L. (1991) A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30:513–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 98:224–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34:57–111. doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, J. G. (1984) Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(5):961–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. (2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review 108(2):291–310. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimizu, Y., Lee, H. & Uleman, J. S. (2017) Culture as automatic processes for making meaning: Spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 69(1):79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todorov, A. & Uleman, J. S. (2004) The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87:482–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uleman, J. K. (2010) An introduction to Kant's moral philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uleman, J. S. (2015) Causes and causal attributions: Questions raised by Dave Hamilton and spontaneous trait inferences. In: Social perception: From individuals to groups, ed. Stroessner, S. J. & Sherman, J. W., pp. 52–70. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Uleman, J. S., Rim, S., Saribay, S. A. & Kressel, L. M. (2012) Controversies, questions, and prospects for spontaneous social inferences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6:657–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar