Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:21:20.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Negotiating responsibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2018

Tamler Sommers
Tamler Sommers*
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204. tamlers@gmail.comhttp://www.uh.edu/class/philosophy/people/somers/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that John Doris should apply his dialogic or collaborationist approach to agency more fully to questions of moral responsibility. To do so, he must discard his form of pluralism that aims to accommodate a variety of theoretical approaches to responsibility in favor of a pluralism that rejects theorizing about responsibility altogether.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 41 , 2018 , e58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Doris, J. M. (2015b). Talking to our selves: Reflection, ignorance, and agency. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonergan, K. (director) (2016) Manchester by the sea. Amazon Studios.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1962) Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48:1–25.Google Scholar