Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-30T00:42:59.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inherence heuristic versus essentialism: Issues of antecedence and cognitive mechanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Vincent Y. Yzerbyt  and
Stéphanie Demoulin
Vincent Y. Yzerbyt
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. vincent.yzerbyt@uclouvain.be stephanie.demoulin@uclouvain.be
Stéphanie Demoulin
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Psychological Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. vincent.yzerbyt@uclouvain.be stephanie.demoulin@uclouvain.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue (1) that the empirical evidence offered by the authors is insufficient to sustain their claim; (2) that, beyond methodological problems, the proposed underlying cognitive mechanism is largely speculative and that a reverse, more motivational, path is equally plausible; and (3) that the distinction and antecedence of inherence intuitions with respect to essentialist beliefs remain to be demonstrated.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 505 - 506
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (2008) Social cognition: From brains to culture. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L. & Ernst, D. (2000) Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology 39:113–27. doi:10.1348/014466600164363.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M. (1990) The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology 20: 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyens, J.-P., Yzerbyt, V. Y. & Corneille, O. (1996) The role of concept applicability in the emergence of the overattribution bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:229–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M. (1984) When belief creates reality. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 18, ed. Berkowitz, L., pp. 248–306. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Corneille, O. & Estrada, C. (2001) The interplay of subjective essentialism and entitativity in the formation of stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review 5:141–55.Google Scholar
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rocher, S. & Schadron, G. (1997) Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In: The psychology of stereotyping and group life, ed. Spears, R., Oakes, P., Ellemers, N. & Haslam, A., pp. 20–50. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar