Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T16:15:35.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The representation of inherent properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Sandeep Prasada
Sandeep Prasada*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY); New York, NY 10065. sprasada@hunter.cuny.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the representation of generic knowledge suggests that inherent properties can have either a principled or a causal connection to a kind. The type of connection determines whether the outcome of the storytelling process will include intuitions of inevitability and a normative dimension and whether it will ground causal explanations.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2014 , pp. 500
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bublitz, D. & Prasada, S. (2013) Normative dimensions of generic knowledge. Poster presented at the 35th Annual Cognitive Science Conference, Berlin, Germany, July 31–August 3.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1983) Fact, fiction, and forecast, 4th edition. Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1955.)Google Scholar
Prasada, S. & Dillingham, E. (2006) Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition 99:73–112.Google Scholar
Prasada, S. & Dillingham, E. (2009) Representation of principled connections: A window onto the formal aspect of common sense conception. Cognitive Science 33:401–48.Google Scholar
Prasada, S., Hennefield, L. & Otap, D. (2012) Conceptual and linguistic representations of kinds and classes. Cognitive Science 36:1224–50.Google Scholar
Prasada, S., Khemlani, S., Leslie, S.-J. & Glucksberg, S. (2013) Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. Cognition 126:405–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed