Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-sp94z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T17:04:29.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The social aetiology of essentialist beliefs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2014

Cliodhna O'Connor
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom. oconnor.c@ucl.ac.uk h.joffe@ucl.ac.uk https://iris.ucl.ac.uk/iris/browse/profile?upi=COCON80 http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/CPB/people/cpb-staff/h_joffe
Helene Joffe
Affiliation:
Division of Psychology & Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom. oconnor.c@ucl.ac.uk h.joffe@ucl.ac.uk https://iris.ucl.ac.uk/iris/browse/profile?upi=COCON80 http://www.ucl.ac.uk/psychlangsci/research/CPB/people/cpb-staff/h_joffe

Abstract

This commentary highlights the importance of attending to the sociocultural contexts that foster essentialist ideas. It contends that Cimpian & Salomon's (C&S's) model undervalues the extent to which the development of essentialist beliefs is contingent on social experience. The result is a restriction of the model's applicability to real-world instances of essentialism-fuelled prejudice and discrimination.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable