We partner with a secure submission system to handle manuscript submissions.
Please note:
You will need an account for the submission system, which is separate to your Cambridge Core account. For login and submission support, please visit the
submission and support pages.
Please review this journal's author instructions, particularly the
preparing your materials
page, before submitting your manuscript.
Click Proceed to submission system to continue to our partner's website.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Any representation of a group G on a vector space V extends uniquely to a representation of G on the free metabelian Lie algebra on V. In this paper we study such representations and make some group-theoretic applications.
The general properties of lattice-perfect measures are discussed. The relationship between countable compactness and measure perfectness, and the relationship between lattice-measure tightness and lattice-measure perfectness are investigated and several applications in topological measure theory are given.
The Kasparov groups are extended to the setting of inverse limits of G-C*-algebras, where G is assumed to be a locally compact group. The K K-product and other important features of the theory are generalized to this setting.
The free product *CRSi of an arbitrary family of disjoint completely simple semigroups {Si}i∈i, within the variety CR of completely regular semigroups, is described by means of a theorem generalizing that of Kaďourek and Polák for free completely regular semigroups. A notable consequence of the description is that all maximal subgroups of *CRSi are free, except for those in the factors Si themselves. The general theorem simplifies in the case of free CR-products of groups and, in particular, free idempotent-generated completely regular semigroups.
Let M be an invariant subspace of L2 (T2) on the bidisc. V1 and V2 denote the multiplication operators on M by coordinate functions z and ω, respectively. In this paper we study the relation between M and the commutator of V1 and , For example, M is studied when the commutator is self-adjoint or of finite rank.
The operators K, k, T and t are defined on the lattice of congruences on a Rees matrix semigroup S as follows. For ρ ∈ (S), ρK and ρk (ρT and ρt) are the greatest and the least congruences with the same kernel (trace) as ρ, respectively. We determine the semigroup generated by the operators K, k, T and t as they act on all completely simple semigroups. We also determine the network of congruences associated with a congruence ρ ∈ (S) and the lattice generated by it. The latter is then represented by generators and relations.
We give a sharp lower bound for the first eigenvalue of the Dirichlet eigenvalue problem on a domain of a complex submanifold of a Kaehler manifold with curvature bounded from above. The bound on the first eigenvalue is given as a function of the extrinsic outer radius and the bounds on the curvature, and it is attained only on geodesic spheres of a space of constant holomorphic sectional curvature embedded in the Kaehler manifold as a totally geodesic submanifold.
In [1], the notion of a local join (meet) endomorphism of a lattice was defied. This notion, though interesting in the context of infinitary lattice operations, is redundant in the finitary setting, so its removal from all hypotheses does not affect the results presented therein. The author regrets this oversight and wishes to thank those readers who are patient enough to read over this error.