Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T22:23:34.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mental computational processes have always been an integral part of motivation science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Michael Richter*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, Effort Lab, School of Psychology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK m.richter@ljmu.ac.uk www.effortlab.website
Guido H. E. Gendolla
Affiliation:
Geneva Motivation Lab, FPSE, Section of Psychology & Swiss Center for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland guido.gendolla@unige.ch www.unige.ch/motivation
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Some constructs in motivation science are certainly underdeveloped and some motivation researchers may work with underspecified constructs, as suggested by Murayama and Jach (M&J). However, this is not indicative of a general problem in motivation science. Many motivation theories focus on specific mechanisms underlying motivated behavior and thus have already adopted the computational process perspective that M&J call for.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable