Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T15:30:47.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Don't throw motivation out with the black box: The value of a good theory revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2025

Jutta Heckhausen Open the ORCID record for Jutta Heckhausen [Opens in a new window]  and
Falko Rheinberg Open the ORCID record for Falko Rheinberg [Opens in a new window]
Jutta Heckhausen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA heckhaus@uci.edu https://faculty.sites.uci.edu/heckhausen/
Falko Rheinberg
Affiliation:
Department Psychologie, Universität Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany motivation@psych.uni-potsdam.de
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Murayama and Jach claim that current motivational constructs do not specify causal processes (black-box problem) and that mental computational processes solve this problem. We argue, process-focused research requires theoretical frameworks addressing situational variations, individual differences, and their interaction. Classic achievement motivation theory provides comprehensive models with empirically measurable process-related constructs and predictions. Recent developments build on this, addressing motivation, action, and their socio-cultural and lifespan context. Theory-free mental computational processes cannot do any of that.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e35
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achtziger, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2018). Motivation and volition in the course of action. In Heckhausen, J. & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 485–528). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64, 359–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunstein, J. C., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Achievement motivation. In Heckhausen, J. & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 221–304). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53–92). Guilford.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, H. (1975). Fear of failure as a self-reinforcing motive system. In Sarason, I. G. & Spielberger, C. (Eds.), Stress and anxiety (Vol. II, pp. 117–128). Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Heckhausen, H. (1977). Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model. Motivation and Emotion, 1, 283–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J. (2000). Evolutionary perspectives on human motivation. American Behavioral Scientist, 43, 1015–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational and volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Development of motivation. In Heckhausen, J. & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 679–743). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2019). Agency and motivation in adulthood and old age. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 191–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhl, J., & Völker, S. (1998). Entwicklung und Persönlichkeit [Development and personality]. In Keller, H. (Ed.), Lehrbuch der entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 207–240). Huber.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1946). Behavior and development as a function of the total situation. In Carmichael, L. (Ed.), Manual of child psychology (pp. 791–844). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheinberg, F., & Engeser, S. (2010). Motive training and motivational competence. In Schultheiss, O. C. & Brunstein, J. C. (Eds.) Implicit motives (pp. 510–548). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiensmeyer-Pelster, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Causal attribution of behavior and achievement. In Heckhausen, J. & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.), Motivation and action (pp. 623–678). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Keyserlingk, L., Rubach, C., Lee, H. R., Eccles, J. S., & Heckhausen, J. (2022). College students’ motivational beliefs and use of goal-oriented control strategies: Integrating two theories of motivated behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 46, 601–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar