Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T11:54:55.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Against unitary theories of music evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

Peter M. C. Harrison Open the ORCID record for Peter M. C. Harrison [Opens in a new window]  and
Madeleine Seale Open the ORCID record for Madeleine Seale [Opens in a new window]
Peter M. C. Harrison
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grüneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. peter.harrison@ae.mpg.de; https://www.pmcharrison.com/
Madeleine Seale
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK. maddy.seale@plants.ox.ac.uk; https://www.plants.ox.ac.uk/people/madeleine-seale
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Savage et al. and Mehr et al. provide well-substantiated arguments that the evolution of musicality was shaped by adaptive functions of social bonding and credible signalling. However, they are too quick to dismiss byproduct explanations of music evolution, and to present their theories as complete unitary accounts of the phenomenon.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 44 , 2021 , e76
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cross, I., & Morley, I. (2008). The evolution of music: Theories, definitions and the nature of the evidence. In Malloch, S. & Trevarthen, C. (Eds.), Communicative musicality (pp. 61–81). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duffey, E. (1998). Aerial dispersal in spiders. In Selden, P. A. (ed.). Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology (pp. 187–191) British Arachnological Society.Google Scholar
Münte, T. F., Altenmüller, E., & Jäncke, L. (2002). The musician's brain as a model of neuroplasticity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(6), 473–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nentwig, W., & Heimer, S. (1987). Ecological aspects of spider webs in ecophysiology of spiders. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Patel, A. D. (2014). The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: Was Darwin wrong? PLoS Biology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001873.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vollrath, F., & Edmonds, D. T. (1989). Modulation of the mechanical properties of spider silk by coating with water. Nature, 340, 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar