Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:37:17.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Complementary medicine

from Medical topics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

By
Felicity L. Bishop  and
George T. Lewith
Edited by
Susan Ayers ,
Andrew Baum ,
Chris McManus ,
Stanton Newman ,
Kenneth Wallston ,
John Weinman  and
Robert West
Felicity L. Bishop
Affiliation:
Aldemoor Health Centre
George T. Lewith
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Susan Ayers
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Andrew Baum
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Chris McManus
Affiliation:
St Mary's Hospital Medical School
Stanton Newman
Affiliation:
University College and Middlesex School of Medicine
Kenneth Wallston
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing
John Weinman
Affiliation:
United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St Thomas's
Robert West
Affiliation:
St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes a wide range of practices which do not fit in with the dominant biomedical model of health care and are not commonly provided within conventional medicine settings. In the 1960s CAM was on the fringe of the mainstream, in the 1970s it was positioned as alternative and in the 1990s it became complementary. In the new millennium, the position of CAM has changed again and is moving towards integration with conventional medicine, for example CAM therapies are commonly offered in palliative care and pain clinic contexts. Currently substantial numbers of people are turning to CAM. The prevalence of CAM use increased from 34% to 39% during the 1990s in the general population in the USA (Eisenberg et al., 1998). In the UK 46% of the population can be expected to use one or more CAM therapies in their lifetime and 10% visited a practitioner of an established CAM therapy in 1998 (Thomas et al., 2001). This chapter addresses the nature of these therapies which are proving so popular with patients, how are they regulated, whether they are seen as complementary or an alternative to conventional medicine and how conventional medicine is reacting to the rising popularity of other approaches to health care.

Popular CAM therapies

The most popular CAM therapies in the UK include acupuncture, osteopathy, chiropractic, herbal medicine and homeopathy. Descriptions of these therapies are provided in Table 1.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine , pp. 639 - 641
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astin, J. A. (1998). Why patients use alternative medicine. Results of a national study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1548–53.Google Scholar
Astin, J. A., Pelletier, K. R., Marie, A. & Haskell, W. L. (2000). Complementary and alternative medicine use among elderly persons: one year analysis of a Blue Shield medicare supplement. Journal of Gerontology, 55A, M4–M9.Google Scholar
Balneaves, L. G., Kristjanson, L. J. & Tataryn, D. (1999). Beyond convention: describing complementary therapy use by women living with breast cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 38, 143–53.Google Scholar
Burg, M. A., Kosch, S. G., Neims, A. H. & Stoller, E. P. (1998). Personal use of alternative medicine therapies by health science center faculty. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1563.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, D. M., Davis, R. B., Ettner, S. L.et al. (1998). Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 1569–75.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. & Beard, R. (1995). Health, just world beliefs and coping style preferences in patients of complementary and orthodox medicine. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 1425–32.Google Scholar
House of Lords. (2000). Complementary and alternative medicine. Select Committee on Science and Technology – 6th Report, Session 1999–2000. London: HMSO.
Linde, K., Clausius, N., Ramirez, G.et al. (1997). Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet, 350, 834–43.Google Scholar
Linde, K., Reamers, G., Mulrow, C. D.et al. (1996). St. John's Wort for depression – an overview and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 313, 253–8.Google Scholar
McGregor, K. J. & Peay, E. R. (1996). The choice of alternative therapy for health care: testing some propositions. Social Science and Medicine, 43, 1317–27.Google Scholar
Moore, A. D., Petri, M. A., Manzi, S.et al. (2000). The use of alternative medical therapies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 43, 1410–18.Google Scholar
Murray, J. & Shepherd, S. (1993). Alternative or additional medicine? An exploratory approach in general practice. Social Science and Medicine, 37, 983–8.Google Scholar
O'Callaghan, F. V. & Jordan, N. (2003). Postmodern values, attitudes and the use of complementary medicine. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 11, 28–32.Google Scholar
Owen, D. & Lewith, G. (2001). Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the undergraduate medical curriculum: the Southampton experience. Medical Education, 35, 73–7.Google Scholar
Paterson, C. & Britten, N. (1999). “Doctors can't help much”: the search for an alternative. British Journal of General Practice, 49, 626–9.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2000). The use of randomized control trials in complementary therapies: exploring the issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(2), 398–406.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. J., Nicholl, J. P. & Coleman, P. (2001). Use and expenditure on complementary medicine in England: a population based survey. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 9, 2–11.Google Scholar
Vickers, A. J. (1996). Can acupuncture have specific effects on health? A systematic review of acupuncture antiemesis trials. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 89, 303–11.Google Scholar
White, P., Lewith, G. T., Berman, B. & Birch, S. (2002). Reviews of acupuncture for chronic neck pain: pitfalls in conducting systematic reviews. Rheumatology, 41, 1224–31.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×