Experts argue that resource transfers from developed to developing countries are central to international climate policy efforts. Yet as countries grapple with the political difficulties of provisioning and accepting climate funds, understanding why voters support or oppose international climate finance becomes critical. Focusing on domestic audiences in both donor and recipient countries, we investigate the determinants of public support for cross-border climate transfers. Theoretically, we focus on the effects of emphasizing the compensatory purposes of funding, favoring mitigation over adaptation activities, and prioritizing partnerships between donor and recipient agents—three factors that generate both normative and material benefits, and thus build support among broader coalitions of voters. Paired survey experiments in the United States and India corroborate the relevance of these transfer features for citizens in donor and recipient countries. Taken together, our findings shed light on the domestic political-economy attributes of transfer agreements that can unlock support for cross-border climate cooperation.

Let $b \geqslant 3$ be an integer and C(b, D) be the set of real numbers in [0,1] whose base b expansion only consists of digits in a set $D {\subseteq} \{0,...,b-1\}$. We study how close can numbers in C(b, D) be approximated by rational numbers with denominators being powers of some integer t and obtain a zero-full law for its Hausdorff measure in several circumstances. When b and t are multiplicatively dependent, our results correct an error of Levesley, Salp and Velani (Math. Ann. 338 (2007), 97–118) and generalise their theorem. When b and t are multiplicatively independent but have the same prime divisors, we obtain a partial result on the Hausdorff measure and bounds for the Hausdorff dimension, which are close to the multiplicatively dependent case. Based on these results, several conjectures are proposed.

Population resettlement in contested ethnoterritories is an old practice that states have pursued for centuries. There is a nascent theory of demographic engineering to explain the phenomenon, although a robust theory on the issue is yet to be built. Theorists generally agree that states transfer and resettle populations to gain territorial control over contested ethnoterritories. But what is not clear in the current scholarship is how states accomplish this or what techniques they deploy to gain territorial control. To address this theoretical lacuna, it is asserted that states seek to gain territorial control in two ways: ‘right-peopling’ (settlement of ‘preferred people’ to alter the demographic balance of the contested area) and ‘unpeopling’ (the extermination of the existing inhabitants). In this article these pathways to gain territorial control are explained by exploring the case of demographic engineering in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh.

This research employs an enhanced Polar Operation Limit Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS) and multi-scale empirical analysis methods to quantitatively evaluate the risks in icy region navigation. It emphasises the significant influence of spatial effects and external environmental factors on maritime accidents. Findings reveal that geographical location, environmental and ice conditions are crucial contributors to accidents. The models indicate that an increase in ports, traffic volume and sea ice density directly correlates with higher accident rates. Additionally, a novel risk estimation model is introduced, offering a more accurate and conservative assessment than current standards. This research enriches the understanding of maritime accidents in icy regions, and provides a robust framework for different navigation stages and conditions. The proposed strategies and model can effectively assist shipping companies in route planning and risk management to enhance maritime safety in icy regions.

With increased global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals and degraded observation environments, the correctness of ambiguity resolution is disturbed, causing unexpected real-time kinematic (RTK) positioning solutions. This paper presents an improved fault detection and exclusion (FDE) method based on the generalized least squares (GLS) model. The correlated GLS model is constructed by regarding double-differencing (DD) integer ambiguities as the known parameters. Meanwhile, the validity of residuals as crucial components of fault detection could be enhanced by the iterative re-weighted least squares (IRLS) method rather than the least squares (LS) without robustness. A static test with artificial faults and a dynamic test with natural faults were carried out, respectively. By analyzing test statistics of the enhanced FDE algorithm and comparing its positioning errors with those from the classical LS, it is shown that our method can provide high-precision and high-reliability RTK solutions facing wrong DD fixed ambiguities due to observation faults.

The practice surrounding Éliane Radigue's Occam Océan works may be read as a new form of work concept, one which poses a productive contradiction against the work concept as it has been (and in some cases has been forgotten) and the work concept as we experience it today. Occam Océan poses a challenge to conventional conceptual understandings on many fronts, namely the practice's lack of notation; its collaborative creation; its particular structural criteria; its contingent, iterative and combinatorial manifestations; and, perhaps most significantly, its social reinscription within bodies. By historicising her work against the established work concept structures and identifying how its qualities create friction against them, Radigue's music is shown to create a small rupture at the heart of the concept itself, demonstrating the possibility of establishing radically alternative practices of music exchange and discourse.

In 1934, the much-publicized engagement of Japanese noblewoman Kuroda Masako to Ethiopian nobleman Araya Abebe made headlines worldwide, epitomizing the transnational dream of a racially anti-hierarchical world. Starting from this unrealized wedding, this article showcases the voice of Kuroda Masako, a racially equal imperial feminist who tried to foster her vision of women participating in the empire-building process even in new settings like Ethiopia. By featuring her practices, we are able to understand why they resonated not only in the women’s press but also in a much larger intellectual scene that comprised Pan-Asian and Pan-African activists. Because of such significant resonance across various non-governmental actors worldwide, the Kuroda-Araya engagement became dangerous to state-endorsed agendas in many countries, which were unwilling to countenance an unprecedented alliance between Ethiopia, Japan, and the African American community at the expense of Western and white civilization discourse. As a result, the engagement created a rupture between popular sympathy and the state, eventually resulting in Japan’s official disengagement from Ethiopia well before the Second Italo-Ethiopian War.

Mark Noll recognized that “the most comprehensive defense of female activity in public life came from Sarah Grimké.” Claudia Setzer lauded Grimké’s Letters, as “the first sustained analysis of women’s rights stemming from biblical and theological argument to be written by an American.” Scholars have studied her use of the Bible, including her critique of translations, but none has detailed Grimké’s use of the influential whole-volume commentaries of Matthew Henry, Thomas Scott, and Adam Clarke. This article documents her citations, critiques, and editing of those commentaries through selection, interruption, omission, and paraphrase. It focuses upon her thirteenth and fourteenth letters, in which Grimké interpreted Acts 2:1–4, 1 Cor 11:4–5 and 14:34–35, and 1 Tim 2:8–12. By studying her critical engagement with commentaries, we demonstrate the veracity of Grimké’s contention that women “shall produce some various readings of the Bible a little different from those we now have.”