Adult Kawasaki patients may require intervention for occlusive coronary artery disease. Some adverse effects of first-generation drug-eluting stent implantation with sirolimus have been reported in this population.

A total of nine lesions in eight (seven males, one female) patients who underwent stent implantations in this population between 2000 and 2021 were reviewed.

The age at stent implantation ranged from 31 to 47 years, with a median of 37 years. There were six lesions treated by primary percutaneous transluminal coronary interventions, and three by elective procedures. A coronary aneurysm was found in two lesions, and coronary artery calcification was found in all culprit lesions. The numbers of everolimus-eluting stents, sirolimus-eluting stents and bare metal stents were six, two, and one, respectively. As anti- thrombotic therapy, aspirin, clopidogrel, and prasugrel were given to four, three, and one, respectively. Warfarin was given to five patients. The follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 years, with a median of 4 years. Follow-up angiograms were performed for eight lesions, at 2 to 38 months, with a median of 11 months. The patency of the target vessel was confirmed in all eight vessels. Slight malapposition, and peri-stent contrast staining were found in two lesions each.

Acute coronary syndrome due to coronary artery lesions caused by Kawasaki disease occurred, even in lesions without any apparent coronary artery aneurysms. In our study, we show safe and efficacious placement of second-generation stent without adverse effects during the short-term follow-up, but long-term follow-up is needed to determine the efficacy and complication.

Strict social distancing and lockdown measures imposed to curb transmission during the early phase of the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges to people’s psychological wellbeing, limited access to social support, and disrupted routine mental health service delivery. In response, a consortium of mental health stakeholders from Goa, India launched the COVIDAV program, which provided pro-bono virtual psychiatric and counselling consultations across India through an online platform. This study describes the acceptability and feasibility of the program from the perspective of various stakeholders.

Data were collected via a survey with clinicians who had volunteered on COVIDAV (n = 40), in depth interviews of the clinicians (n = 14), and focus group discussion with key collaborators (n = 1). Process data were mapped at various stages during the online platform’s development and use. The qualitative and quantitative data was analysed using thematic analysis and a descriptive analysis respectively.

Over 17 months, 63 clinicians conducted 2245 online sessions through the COVID platform, primarily accessed by youth across the country. The clinicians acknowledged the online platform’s ability to enhance access and reduce stigma. Challenges included session time constraints, connectivity issues, and user interface inconsistencies that interfered with clients’ accessibility to the services. High satisfaction rates amongst the service providers were reported, with 79.3% content with the service provision and 82.8% with pro bono contributions through the platform.

This study illustrates the feasibility, flexibility, and applicability of a rapidly designed pro-bono online platform for delivering mental health care services through the collaboration of stakeholder groups in the mental health care, private, social, and governmental sector. Our findings highlight the potential of rapidly deployed digital platforms, developed via cross-sector partnerships, to meet mental health care needs during unprecedented global emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Young people are increasingly distressed by the climate and ecological crises (eco-distress). This has been associated with the failure of people in power to act appropriately, which may cause moral distress and moral injury. We examined this hypothesis by interviewing 13 young adults (19–25 years) in the UK about their climate concerns and perceptions of how State actors and authorities are responding to climate change. Using reflexive thematic analysis, four themes were developed: (1) Climate change is a wicked problem, (2) Moral distress is associated with witnessing acts of omission and commission, (3) Moral distress drives eco-distress, and (4) Opportunities for moral repair. Climate concerns extended to broader concerns about ecological degradation (eco-distress), linked to feelings of moral distress arising from repeatedly witnessing powerful people failing to act on climate change. Eco-distress was also exacerbated by (a) witnessing others in society failing to take appropriate responsibility, (b) realising the limitations of individual action, and (c) being embedded within a culture where personal contribution to climate change is inescapable. In contrast, eco-distress was lessened by seeing authorities engage with the issues morally, and further mitigated by collective, ethical, pro-environmental action. This adds empirical evidence to support the hypothesis that eco-distress involves moral distress and injury arising when State authorities and other powerful bodies engage in wrongful acts and omissions on climate change. We argue that this is affecting the wellbeing of young people and supports the argument that such wrongful (in)action infringes human rights. Clinical implications are discussed.

1. (1) To understand how and why moral distress and moral injury relate to the distress that young people feel about climate change (eco-distress).

2. (2) To consider the clinical implications of formulating eco-distress in a way that includes reference to the violation of core moral codes.

3. (3) To explore what opportunities exist that could reduce moral distress and support young people.

4. (4) To understand how research into moral distress and moral injury in relation to climate change can offer important insight into the relevance of eco-distress to human rights infringements and justice-oriented care.

5. (5) To discuss practical solutions that might support moral repair, both in psychotherapy settings and in broader social policy.

The father of Czech music, Bedřich Smetana was a brilliant, patriotic Romantic composer who spent his last decade completely deaf. He became progressively ill in his final years and passed away prematurely at 60 years old. Since then, there have been two main propositions for the etiology of his neurological symptoms, in particular his hearing loss: neurosyphilis or osteomyelitis of the temporal bone.

This article compares the clinical presentation and pathology of neurosyphilis and osteomyelitis.

This article infers which one is arguably the most likely cause based on Smetana’s own medical history, signs and symptoms and autopsy findings.

Smetana’s clinical presentation and pathological results grant us a clearer picture of his neurological condition and allows us to diagnose his final neurological deterioration as complications of neurosyphilis and not osteomyelitis of the temporal bone.

The purpose of this study is to examine the national impact of workplace factors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on mental health experienced by non-physician healthcare workers (HCWs).

This study consisted of an online sample of non-physician HCWs across the United States, including nurses, medical assistants, and physician assistants. The survey consisted of 93 questions, which included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD-10) scale, questions about COVID-19 vaccination, sources of trusted information, and questions about work environment and training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate associations.

In the final sample (N = 220), (81.8%) reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID vaccine. Most respondents trusted the CDC’s information on the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 disease. Several workplace-related factors that occurred during the pandemic were associated with moderate to high levels of perceived stress, fatigue, and higher risk of developing depression. In particular, concerns about exposing others, experiencing discrimination related to their jobs, and caring for patients who died from COVID-19 were associated with increased perceived stress, depression, and fatigue.

The importance of planning by healthcare facilities should include planning for workplace factors associated with poor mental health among all HCWs.

In recent years, the importance of telemedicine has increased significantly. Especially in the field of echocardiography, virtual reality glasses offer the possibility of real-time data transmission without restrictions in the examination process. In particular, the care of critically ill newborns with suspected CHD might be improved by allowing a specialized paediatric cardiologist to remotely guide an echocardiographic examination. The current study aims to prove whether novices, under Google Glass guidance by a paediatric cardiologist, can perform an appropriate neonatal echocardiography.

The current study is a prospective monocentric single-blinded pilot study. Participants were supposed to perform two test runs: The first test run was “unguided” and the second test run was instructed via Google Glass. A validated training simulator for neonatal echocardiography “EchocomNeo, Echocom GmbH” was used. The study took place at the Leipzig Heart Center, Department of Pediatric Cardiology from April 2022 to November 2022.

A total of 21 medical students were enrolled. In total 252 views (126 views in each test run) were recorded. The overall performance was significantly higher in the Google Glass guided test run compared to “unguided” (structure score: 77.6% vs. 63.2%. p < 0.001 and quality score: 58.7% vs. 47.2%, p < 0.001). Also, the time was significantly lower in the Google Glass guided test run than in the unguided test run, p = 0.014.

Google Glass guidance by a paediatric cardiologist could optimize the performance of novices in echocardiography using a standardized neonatal echo-simulator with structural normal cardiac anatomy.

The Russian–Ukrainian War of 2022 (RUW-2022) was accompanied by the subsequent risk of accidents at a nuclear power plant in Ukraine. This study investigated posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms related to media reports of an attack on a Ukrainian nuclear power plant during the RUW-2022 among victims of the Fukushima nuclear disaster and revealed their association with radiation risk perception (RRP) of the accident.

This cross-sectional study targeted 1193 residents of Naraha Town in Fukushima Prefecture. PTS symptoms were measured using the Japanese version of the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Univariate and multivariate analyses explored the association between IES-R scores and background factors, particularly RRP.

Participants with higher RRP showed significantly higher IES-R scores; furthermore, the proportion of disruption because of radiation anxiety was significantly larger among higher RRP residents. Radiation anxiety mediated the association between RRP and PTS symptoms (total IES-R score and sub-item of intrusion).

People with higher RRP in Fukushima may continue to be at risk of persistent, unwanted PTS symptoms due to future nuclear crises. Therefore, mental health practitioners need to continue providing support in affected areas for a longer period than anticipated. Moreover, a population-based approach to cope with these stressors from media reports is essential.