Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Publications
  3. Open Access
  4. Research Open

Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

73304 results in Open Access

Page 1230 of 3666

  • Editorial note

  • Journal:
    Journal of Linguistics / Volume 51 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2015, p. 1
    Print publication:
    March 2015
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Forthcoming articles

  • Journal:
    Journal of Linguistics / Volume 51 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2015, pp. 265-266
    Print publication:
    March 2015
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • LIN volume 51 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Journal:
    Journal of Linguistics / Volume 51 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2015, pp. f1-f2
    Print publication:
    March 2015
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Antiprioritarianism

  • HILARY GREAVES
  • Journal:
    Utilitas / Volume 27 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2015, pp. 1-42

  • Prioritarianism is supposed to be a theory of the overall good that captures the common intuition of ‘priority to the worse off’. But it is difficult to give precise content to the prioritarian claim. Over the past few decades, prioritarians have increasingly responded to this ‘content problem’ by formulating prioritarianism not in terms of an alleged primitive notion of quantity of well-being, but instead in terms of von Neumann–Morgenstern utility. The resulting two forms of prioritarianism (respectively, ‘Primitivist’ and ‘Technical’ prioritarianism) are not mere variants on a theme, but are entirely distinct theories, amenable to different motivating arguments and open to different objections. This article argues that the basic intuition of ‘priority to the worse off’ provides no support for Technical Prioritarianism: qua attempt to capture that intuition, the turn to von Neumann–Morgenstern utility is a retrograde step.

  • LIN volume 51 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Journal:
    Journal of Linguistics / Volume 51 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 February 2015, pp. b1-b8
    Print publication:
    March 2015
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • JFL volume 25 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Journal:
    Journal of French Language Studies / Volume 25 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2015, pp. b1-b6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Social Networks and Urban Space: Worker Mobilization in the First Years of “New” Unionism in Brazil*

  • Francisco Barbosa de Macedo
  • Journal:
    International Review of Social History / Volume 60 / Issue 1 / April 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2015, pp. 37-71
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • In 1980, thousands of metalworkers from the region of greater São Paulo known as the “ABC” region carried out one of the most intense and lasting strikes in the history of the Brazilian working class. For forty-one days, striking workers resisted the repression that bosses and the nation's military regime mounted against them, which contributed to the collective worker mobilization that spread throughout the spaces of the city – especially the streets of the São Bernardo do Campo neighborhood. Expelled from factories and major public spaces, workers were able to maintain the strike mainly in the neighborhoods where they lived, thus politicizing the spaces and relationships of their daily lives and redefining the geography of collective mobilization. This article analyzes aspects of this process, highlighting the importance of workers’ social networks to the notable (re)appropriation of urban space that characterized the strike movement.

  • JFL volume 25 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Journal:
    Journal of French Language Studies / Volume 25 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    04 February 2015, pp. f1-f2
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • Far from depleted…

  • Neeraja Sankaran
  • Journal:
    The British Journal for the History of Science / Volume 48 / Issue 1 / March 2015
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    03 February 2015, pp. 171-174
    Print publication:
    March 2015

  • There's just no deleting Darwin, not really. Even Peter Bowler, the title to whose delightful book purports to do just that, is quick to add in the subtitle that he is only imagining the history of science without Darwin. The sixty-three essays written by a like number of scholars, Bowler among them (some articles are co-authored and a handful of authors have contributed to more than one essay) in the recently published Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought bear additional witness to the fact that Darwin's ideas continue to exert a powerful influence on historians, philosophers and biologists alike.

Page 1230 of 3666