The use of apps represents a revolution in mental health. Fast, versatile, and manageable, mHealth apps allow empowerment of patients and professionals and can even reduce stigmatization. There is not yet a standardized method to assess their effectiveness and safety. The objective of the EvalDepApps project is to develop an assessment tool for apps that have management of depression as the main goal.

The EvalDepApps project follows several stages:

(i) Systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, to identify evidence about effectiveness and safety of mHealth interventions to manage depressive symptoms among adults, and criteria to be included in the app assessment tools. The primary outcome was the reduction of depressive symptoms, and only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included.

(ii) Delphi process with 30 participants (patients and healthcare professionals) to reach consensus about the criteria to be included in the tool.

(iii) Co-creation workshops with 12 healthcare professionals and 12 patients to co-design the EvalDepApps tool.

Twenty-nine RCTs were included. The most common elements were psychoeducation, goal setting, and gamification. Significant effect for mHealth interventions in reducing depressive symptoms compared with non-active control (95% confidence interval: −0.87, −0.37; I2=87%) was identified. Hybrid interventions combining mHealth with face-to-face sessions were the most effective. Any study-related adverse events were reported. Response rate was 59 percent (26/44) in round one and 52 percent (23/44) in round two. Twenty-eight out of 51 criteria (54.9%) were accepted by consensus. Proposals were received about the look and feel of the content, usability aspects, sections, and main features of the EvalDepApps tool.

mHealth interventions, particularly hybrid ones, can be effective in reducing depressive symptoms. There is a need for personalized approaches. It is important to prioritize evidence-based principles and standardized evaluation tools. A set of 25 criteria will be included in the EvalDepApps tool that will be co-created thanks to the input given by healthcare professionals and people diagnosed with depression.

A consortium of five Spanish health technology assessment (HTA) agencies conducted the European Reference Networks Guidelines Programme for the development, appraisal, and implementation of clinical practice guidelines aiming to support clinical decision-making in the field of rare diseases (RDs). In response to this objective, methodologists and information specialists conducted systematic reviews (SRs). This study aims to explore the barriers/facilitators they encountered.

A survey was designed to elicit HTA agencies’ experience in developing SRs on RDs. Information was collected on the number of SRs conducted and the types of RDs and clinical questions addressed. In addition, they were asked to identify barriers and facilitators for each stage of the review (from the definition of PICO [population, intervention, comparator, outcome] components of the question to the issuing of recommendations). Finally, they were asked for process improvement suggestions. The survey was distributed by email and completed online. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify the issues identified at each stage of SR.

A total of 111 SRs were conducted on 35 RDs. Most clinical questions were about diagnosis and treatment. The main barriers identified were lack of MesH (Medical Subject Headings) terms associated with the conditions, non-representative abstracts and keywords, lack of relevant information in the body of the articles, and reported data not allowing for quantitative syntheses or recommendations to be made. Facilitating aspects included Orphanet’s specific source of RD documents and having expert clinicians in the working groups who were also involved in all steps of the SR.

Conducting SRs in the field of RDs is challenging. Authors of primary studies are encouraged to be more exhaustive in reporting the results. More research focused on the SR methodology in RDs is necessary to address their particular characteristics and obtain robust results. It is crucial to collaborate with reference networks to address RDs, where the evidence is scarce.

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) offer advantages for schizophrenic patients compared to oral antipsychotics: less frequent dosing, lower relapse rates, better adherence, and lower healthcare costs. LAIs include paliperidone, aripiprazole, olanzapine, risperidone, and zuclopenthixol. Paliperidone palmitate is the only antipsychotic with two formulations with an administration interval longer than one month (3-monthly and 6-monthly), which could be better for the patient and help ensure treatment continuity, especially in cases of limited access to the health care system.

To assess the satisfaction of patients under treatment with 6-month paliperidone palmitate compared to other long-acting injectable antipsychotics with a higher frequency of administration.

We analyzed the satisfaction level of a sample of patients receiving treatment with LAIs at the Mental Health Center of El Escorial. All patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders (according to DSM-5). Patients who met the inclusion criteria completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), a generic questionnaire of treatment satisfaction that measures four dimensions: side effects, treatment efficacy, comfort of use, and overall satisfaction. Other clinical and socio-demographic variables were collected, as well as the type of injectable, dose, and frequency of administration.

Data from approximately 30 patients will be analyzed and discussed later.

Less frequent administration of LAIs may result in greater patient satisfaction and be just as beneficial clinically. Treatment satisfaction is positively associated with an improvement in psychotic symptoms and seems to be related to better adherence.

None Declared

The psychosocial and mental health-oriented variables of people are determinants for their life in society and their roles within organizations, especially educational institutions that are endowed with social complexities.

The objective of this research was to understand the meaning of work for teachers in educational institutions in the department in order to recognize elements such as the level of importance that work holds for them and the factors that either promote or hinder that centrality.

This is a descriptive study with a quantitative methodology, and the sample selection was done for convenience, taking into account ethical aspects such as the handling of confidentiality for both the individuals who participated in this study and the educational institutions involved.

Regarding the meaning attributed to work by teachers, the results indicate that 29.6% of teachers declare themselves neutral when it comes to the statement that “the most important things in people’s lives are related to work”. 26.8% of teachers are neutral regarding the statement that “the primary function of work is to generate income”, and 17.9% somewhat agree. 20.7% disagree to some extent. 15.6% disagree with the statement that “people’s primary goals in life should be oriented toward work”. 25.1% of teachers are neutral, and 17.9% somewhat agree with the statement that “the main function of work is to enable interesting contacts with other people”. Only 11.7% strongly agree with the statement that “work is, in general, one of the most important things in people’s lives.

It is concluded that there is a need to implement strategies that contribute to the strengthening of the teaching profession and contribute to improving educational quality

None Declared

Psychotic patients are a vulnerable population from a social and health point of view. The SARS Cov-2 pandemic affected millions of people around the world, however, its effects on psychotic patients in Avilés Spain, have not been analized.

The objective of this study was to determine and compare the mortality of patients with psychosis due to SARS Cov-2 in Avilés, Spain with others regions and countries in the European Union. Determine the influence of social condition and antipsychotic treatment on the condition of these patients.

This is a descriptive, observational study, in which patients diagnosed with psychosis in the period 2020-2021 who contracted SARS Cov-2 infection in Avilés, Spain, were studied to determine those who died from this cause. The influence of social status and antipsychotic medication, as well as sociodemographic factors (age, sex, marital status) were analyzed and compared with other regions and countries of the European Union.

Despite the high mortality rate in patients with psychosis, during the years of the pandemic SARS Cov-2 played an important role given the vulnerability of these patients.

The negative effects and deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic were at the time a major problem for public health worldwide. This study concluded that the morbidity and mortality of psychotic patients who contracted COVID-19 was lower than the rest of the population.

None Declared

This study aims to develop a framework for establishing priorities in the regional health service of Murcia, Spain, to facilitate the creation of a comprehensive multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework. This framework will aid in decision-making processes related to the assessment, reimbursement, and utilization of high-impact health technologies.

Based on the results of a review of existing frameworks for MCDA of health technologies, a set of criteria was proposed to be used in the context of evaluating high-impact health technologies. Key stakeholders within regional healthcare services, including clinical leaders and management personnel, participated in a focus group (n = 11) to discuss the proposed criteria and select the final fifteen. To elicit the weights of the criteria, two surveys were administered, one to a small sample of healthcare professionals (n = 35) and another to a larger representative sample of the general population (n = 494).

The responses obtained from health professionals in the weighting procedure exhibited greater consistency compared to those provided by the general public. The criteria more highly weighted were “Need for intervention” and “Intervention outcomes.” The weights finally assigned to each item in the multicriteria framework were derived as the equal-weighted sum of the mean weights from the two samples.

A multi-attribute function capable of generating a composite measure (multicriteria) to assess the value of high-impact health interventions has been developed. Furthermore, it is recommended to pilot this procedure in a specific decision context to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, usefulness, and reliability of the proposed tool.

Health technology assessment (HTA) agencies in Spain have an important role in informing decisions about the introduction and use of health technologies in the Spanish National Health System. However, although different approaches have been taken to measure and improve their impact, no study to date has explored the perceived impact of HTA products at the national level. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of macro-, meso-, and micro-level decision makers on how to improve the impact of HTA.

Three online focus groups were conducted with policy makers, healthcare managers, clinicians, and patients. The transcripts were evaluated using a deductive thematic analysis based on a multidimensional framework to explore mechanisms of impact.

Four key themes were identified:

1. (i) Timeliness and use of HTA assessments: Although the quality of the reports was recognized, the time taken for the elaboration and extension of reports negatively affected their use. Participants considered that reports should be tailored to the needs of end users (e.g., briefer versions available for meso-and micro-level use);

2. (ii) Effective engagement and external communications: The engagement of multiple stakeholders (policy makers, manufacturers, clinicians, and patients) in the elaboration process was considered crucial to improve HTA impact and ensure adequate communication of results;

3. (iii) Good institutional reputation and fit within the healthcare and policy making system: Stakeholders agreed on the need to strengthen collaboration at the national level and increase public understanding of the value of HTA and its use in healthcare decision-making; and

4. (iv) Effective implementation of policy change regarding health technologies: Stakeholders were very receptive to the results and recommendations of HTA reports when new technologies are demanded, but the identification and selection process should be improved to guarantee that these reports are available on time.

This study has identified different proposals and mechanisms that could improve the impact of HTA in Spain.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has serious physiological and psychological consequences. The long-term (>12 weeks post-infection) impact of COVID-19 on mental health, specifically in older adults, is unclear. We longitudinally assessed the association of COVID-19 with depression symptomatology in community-dwelling older adults with metabolic syndrome within the framework of the PREDIMED-Plus cohort.

Participants (n = 5486) aged 55–75 years were included in this longitudinal cohort. COVID-19 status (positive/negative) determined by tests (e.g. polymerase chain reaction severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, IgG) was confirmed via event adjudication (410 cases). Pre- and post-COVID-19 depressive symptomatology was ascertained from annual assessments conducted using a validated 21-item Spanish Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Multivariable linear and logistic regression models assessed the association between COVID-19 and depression symptomatology.

COVID-19 in older adults was associated with higher post-COVID-19 BDI-II scores measured at a median (interquartile range) of 29 (15–40) weeks post-infection [fully adjusted β = 0.65 points, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15–1.15; p = 0.011]. This association was particularly prominent in women (β = 1.38 points, 95% CI 0.44–2.33, p = 0.004). COVID-19 was associated with 62% increased odds of elevated depression risk (BDI-II ≥ 14) post-COVID-19 when adjusted for confounders (odds ratio; 95% CI 1.13–2.30, p = 0.008).

COVID-19 was associated with long-term depression risk in older adults with overweight/obesity and metabolic syndrome, particularly in women. Thus, long-term evaluations of the impact of COVID-19 on mental health and preventive public health initiatives are warranted in older adults.

Transition between adolescence and adulthood represents the most important challenge for personal development and involves several transformations: physical, psychological and social. It is a complex age bracket, concurring the transition from youth psychiatric units to adult ones, with an increased risk for the appearance of mental disorders and risky behaviours. TRANVIA program, developed in Avilés, provides psychiatric assistance to patients between 15 and 25 years old, diagnosed with a severe psychiatric disorder or with an increased risk of having one.

Our objectives are: ensuring clinical continuity assistance, promoting communication among professionals and the empowerment of our patients to improve their functionality and quality of life.

Descriptive study including patients involved in TRANVIA program from November 2019 to November 2021.

During this two-years period there have been 44 referrals to the program, 11 of them were rejected for failure to comply with diagnostic criteria. In November 2021 there were 33 patients included in the TRANVIA program with an average age of 17 years old (range: 15-22). 70% of them were men and 30% women. All of them had psychiatric assistance from different sources: youth mental health units, neuropediatrics… About 75% of the patients were diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder and approximately three-quarters of the sample needed pharmacological treatment. Risperidone was the most prescribed drug. We have also developed other assistance alternatives as home-based care, relaxation sessions, social worker interventions and coordination with schools.

TRANVIA program has allowed us to provide continual attention to vulnerable patients that shift from youth psychiatric units to adult ones. Patients that meet inclusion criteria were enrolled independently the type of assistance they have previously received. Accessibility and flexibility were our priority. During the described period there was only one dropout, three patients required psychiatric hospitalization and two others visited the emergency department. There have been no cases of completed suicide.

None Declared