While dying at home is often described as desirable, to our knowledge, no reviews have focused specifically on people’s reasons for wanting to die at home. This review describes the breadth of what is known about motivations, attitudes, ideas, and reasons underlying the decision to choose “home” as one’s preferred placed of death.

This review was guided by a scoping review methodology following a five-stage approach including: (1) identify the research question, (2) identify relevant studies, (3) select studies based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, (4) chart the data, and (5) summarize and report the results.

Seventeen articles were identified that met inclusion/exclusion criteria and discussed motivations underlying people’s desires to die at home. Thirty-five percent of studies were from Canada (n = 6/17), 29% were from Europe (n = 5/17), and 29% were from Asia (n = 5/17). Most studies (n = 11/17) used methods that involved collecting and/or analyzing interview data from participants, while the remaining studies (n = 6/17) used methods that involved administering and analyzing surveys or questionnaires. Characteristics of participants varied, but most commonly, studies included people with advanced illnesses who were nearing death (35% of studies, n = 6/17). Motivations for choosing a home death included desires to preserve a sense of self, factors relating to interpersonal relationships, and topics such as culture, religion, socioeconomic status, living situation, and lived experience.

The many interconnected reasons that lead people to choose a home death vary, as individuals have a range of motivations for choosing to die at home, which are highly influenced by contextual and cultural factors. Ultimately, this review will provide a comprehensive description of factors which may inform end-of-life planning, highlighting needs to be considered when planning the preferred location of a death.

Australian children fall short of national dietary guidelines with only 63 % consuming adequate fruit and 10 % enough vegetables. Before school care operates as part of Out of School Hours Care (OSHC) services and provides opportunities to address poor dietary habits in children. The aim of this study was to describe the food and beverages provided in before school care and to explore how service-level factors influence food provision.

A cross-sectional study was conducted in OSHC services. Services had their before school care visited twice between March and June 2021. Direct observation was used to capture food and beverage provision and child and staff behaviour during breakfast. Interviews with staff collected information on service characteristics. Foods were categorised using the Australian Dietary Guidelines, and frequencies were calculated. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare food provision with service characteristics.

The before school care of OSHC services in New South Wales, Australia.

Twenty-five OSHC services.

Fruit was provided on 22 % (n 11) of days and vegetables on 12 % (n 6). Services with nutrition policies containing specific language on food provision (i.e. measurable) were more likely to provide fruit compared with those with policies using non-specific language (P= 0·027). Services that reported receiving training in healthy eating provided more vegetables than those who had not received training (P= 0·037).

Before school care can be supported to improve food provision through staff professional development and advocating to regulatory bodies for increased specificity requirements in the nutrition policies of service providers.

Imagery-focused therapies within cognitive behavioural therapy are growing in interest and use for people with delusions.

This review aimed to examine the outcomes of imagery-focused interventions in people with delusions.

PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched for studies that included a clinical population with psychosis and delusions who experienced mental imagery. The review was informed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and quality appraisal of all included papers was completed using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. Information from included texts was extracted and collated in Excel, which informed the narrative synthesis of results.

Of 2,736 studies identified, eight were eligible for inclusion and rated for quality with an average score of 70.63%. These studies largely supported their aims in reducing levels of distress and intrusiveness of imagery. Four of the eight studies used case series designs, two were randomised controlled trials, and two reported single case studies. It appears that interventions targeting mental imagery were acceptable and well tolerated within a population of people experiencing psychosis and delusions.

Some therapeutic improvement was reported, although the studies consisted of mainly small sample sizes. Clinical implications include that people with a diagnosis of psychosis can engage with imagery-focused therapeutic interventions with limited adverse events. Future research is needed to tackle existing weaknesses of design and explore the outcomes of imagery interventions within this population in larger samples, under more rigorous methodologies.

Emergency psychiatric care, unplanned hospital admissions, and inpatient health care are the costliest forms of mental health care. According to Statistics Canada (2018), almost 18% (5.3 million) of Canadians reported needing mental health support. However, just above half of this figure (56.2%) have reported their needs were fully met. To further expand capacity and access to mental health care in the province, Nova Scotia Health has launched a novel mental health initiative, the Rapid Access, and Stabilization Program (RASP).

This study evaluates the effectiveness and impact of the RASP on high-cost health services utilization (e.g. ED visits, mobile crisis visits, and inpatient treatments) and related costs. It also assesses healthcare partners’ (e.g. healthcare providers, policymakers, community leaders) perceptions and patient experiences and satisfaction with the program and identifies sociodemographic characteristics, psychological conditions, recovery, well-being, and risk measures in the assisted population.

This is a hypothesis-driven program evaluation study that employs a mixed methods approach. A within-subject comparison will examine health services utilization data from patients attending RASP, one year before and one year after their psychiatry assessment at the program. A controlled between-subject comparison will use historical data from a control population will examine whether possible changes in high-cost health services utilization are associated with the intervention (RASP). The primary analysis involves extracting secondary data from provincial information systems, electronic medical records, and regular self-reported clinical assessments. Additionally, a qualitative sub-study will examine patient experience and satisfaction, and examine health care partners’ impressions.

The results for the primary, secondary, and qualitative outcome measures to be available within 6 months of study completion. We expect that RASP evaluation findings will demonstrate a minimum 10% reduction in high-cost health services utilization and corresponding 10% cost savings, and also a reduction in the wait times for patient consultations with psychiatrists to less than 30 calendar days. In addition, we anticipate that patients, healthcare providers, and healthcare partners would express high levels of satisfaction with the new service.

This study will demonstrate the results of the Mental Health and Addictions Program (MHAP) efforts to provide stepped-care, particularly community-based support, to individuals with mental illnesses. Results will provide new insights into a novel community-based approach to mental health service delivery and contribute to knowledge on how to implement mental health programs across varying contexts.

None Declared

Subthreshold depressive symptoms are both prevalent and associated with negative outcomes in older adults, including conversion to major depressive disorder and other medical conditions. Antidepressants are not recommended as first-line or sole intervention for subthreshold depression; thus, finding other efficacious interventions is important. In depressed adults, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the frontal lobe has antidepressant properties and pairing tDCS with cognitive training results in additional benefit due to enhancement of frontal cortical activity. However, these studies have primarily targeted depressed adults under age 65 years and less is known about whether this intervention combination is beneficial or affects subthreshold depressive symptoms in older adults.

We are reporting secondary data analyses from Nissim et al. (2019), who recruited 30 non-demented healthy older adults and randomized them to receive active or sham tDCS in combination with cognitive training for 2 weeks. Active tDCS was delivered bifrontally over F3 (cathode) and F4 (anode) for 20-min at 2 mA intensity through two 5x7 cm2 saline saturated sponge electrodes using the Soterix Medical 1x1 tDCS clinical trials device. Sham tDCS had identical set-up with 2 mA stimulation for 30-sec with 30-sec ramp up and down. Cognitive training was administered for 40-min daily using attention/processing speed and working memory modules from BrainHQ. The first 20-min of cognitive training was paired with active or sham tDCS. To allow room for symptom improvement, we only included participants with Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd edition (BDI-II) scores of 5 or greater ("minimal" depression severity). We identified 15 participants who met this cut-off (70.93 ± 5.41 years old, 10 females, 16.4 years ± 2.32 years education, MoCA = 27.27 ± 2.34; 7 active, 8 sham).

tDCS conditions did not significantly differ in age, sex, years of education, MoCA scores, number of completed intervention days, or baseline BDI-II (active: 7.71 ± 2.93, sham: 11.38 ± 6.44). There were no differences in sensation ratings between groups or in confidence ratings for condition received (suggesting successful blinding). Results indicated the combination of active (and not sham) tDCS with cognitive training was associated with reduced depressive symptoms (2.7 vs. 1.4 points, active vs. sham). Including covariates (age, sex, education, MoCA scores, and number of completed intervention days) in the model further strengthened this discrepancy (3.7 vs. 0.51 points, active vs. sham).

While preliminary, these results suggest this intervention combination may be a potential method for improving subthreshold depressive symptoms in older adults via targeting prefrontal neural circuitry and promoting neuroplasticity of the underlying neural network. While baseline BDI-II scores did not significantly differ, the active tDCS group had a lower score than sham, but saw greater improvement in BDI-II scores post-intervention despite having less room for change. Adequate treatment of subthreshold depressive symptoms may prevent or reduce negative outcomes associated with depressive symptoms in at-risk older adults. Larger randomized clinical trials are needed to better understand tDCS plus cognitive training antidepressant effects in this age group.

To evaluate the clinical impact of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (PNA panel) in critically ill patients.

Single-center, preintervention and postintervention retrospective cohort study.

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

Adult ICU patients.

Patients with quantitative bacterial cultures obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or tracheal aspirate either before (January–March 2021, preintervention period) or after (January–March 2022, postintervention period) implementation of the PNA panel were randomly screened until 25 patients per study month (75 in each cohort) who met the study criteria were included. Antibiotic use from the day of culture collection through day 5 was compared.

The primary outcome of median time to first antibiotic change based on microbiologic data was 50 hours before the intervention versus 21 hours after the intervention (P = .0006). Also, 56 postintervention regimens (75%) were eligible for change based on PNA panel results; actual change occurred in 30 regimens (54%). Median antibiotic days of therapy (DOTs) were 8 before the intervention versus 6 after the intervention (P = .07). For the patients with antibiotic changes made based on PNA panel results, the median time to first antibiotic change was 10 hours. For patients who were initially on inadequate therapy, time to adequate therapy was 67 hours before the intervention versus 37 hours after the intervention (P = .27).

The PNA panel was associated with decreased time to first antibiotic change and fewer antibiotic DOTs. Its impact may have been larger if a higher percentage of potential antibiotic changes had been implemented. The PNA panel is a promising tool to enhance antibiotic stewardship.

The diagnosis of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders (NPDs) in primary care can suffer from inefficiencies resulting in misdiagnoses and delayed diagnosis, limiting effective treatment options. The development of speech and language-based profiling biomarkers could aid in achieving earlier motor diagnosis for PD for instance, or more accurate diagnosis of clinically similar or late presenting NPDs.

RHAPSODY aims to investigate the feasibility of the remote administration of a battery of speech tasks in eliciting continuous narrative speech across a range of NPDs. The project also aims to determine the feasibility of using acoustic and linguistic biomarkers from speech data to support the clinical assessment and disambiguation of common NPDs

All participants (n=250) will take part in a single virtual telemedicine video conference with a researcher in which they are screened and complete a battery of speech tasks, in addition to cohort-specific screening measures. Over the following month, participants will be asked to complete a series of short, self-administered speech assessments via a smartphone application.

The speech tasks will be audio-recorded and analysed on Novoic’s technology platform. Objectives will be analysed using measures including average length of speech elicitation for speech tasks, intra- and inter-subject variance, differences in linguistic patterns, and response rates to speech assessments.

The analyses could help to identify and validate speech-derived clinical biomarkers to support clinicians in detecting and disambiguating between NPDs with heterogeneous presentations. This should further support earlier intervention, improved treatment options and improved quality of life.

In terms of significant financial interest and relationships, it is emphasised that the private organisation Novoic, who aim to develop speech algorithms for diagnostic use, is the study’s sponsor and employees or former employees of this company comprise

Non-penetrating head and neck trauma is associated with extracranial traumatic vertebral artery injury (eTVAI) in approximately 1–2% of cases. Most patients are initially asymptomatic but have an increased risk for delayed stroke and mortality. Limited evidence is available to guide the management of asymptomatic eTVAI. As such, we sought to investigate national practice patterns regarding screening, treatment, and follow-up domains.

A cross-sectional, electronic survey was distributed to members of the Canadian Neurosurgical Society and Canadian Spine Society. We presented two cases of asymptomatic eTVAI, stratified by injury mechanism, fracture type, and angiographic findings. Screening questions were answered prior to presentation of angiographic findings. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

One hundred-eight of 232 (46%) participants, representing 20 academic institutions, completed the survey. Case 1: 78% of respondents would screen for eTVAI with computed topography angiography (CTA) (97%), immediately (88%). The majority of respondents (97%) would treat with aspirin (89%) for 3–6 months (46%). Respondents would follow up clinically (89%) or radiographically (75%), every 1–3 months. Case 2: 73% of respondents would screen with CTA (96%), immediately (88%). Most respondents (94%) would treat with aspirin (50%) for 3–6 months (35%). Thirty-six percent of respondents would utilize endovascular therapy. Respondents would follow up clinically (97%) or radiographically (89%), every 1–3 months.

This survey of Canadian practice patterns highlights consistency in the approach to screening, treatment, and follow-up of asymptomatic eTVAI. These findings are relevant to neurosurgeons, spinal surgeons, stroke neurologists, and neuro-interventionalists.