A segment of the debate surrounding the commercialization of geneticallyengineered (GE) crops, such as glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, focuses onthe theory that implementation of these traits is an extension of theintensification of agriculture that will further erode the biodiversity ofagricultural landscapes. A large field-scale study was conducted in 2006 inthe United States on 156 different field sites with a minimum 3-yr historyof GR corn, cotton, or soybean in the cropping system. The impact ofcropping system, crop rotation, frequency of using the GR crop trait, andseveral categorical variables on emerged weed density and diversity wasanalyzed. Species richness, evenness, Shannon's H′, proportion of forbs,erect growth habit, and C3 species diversity were all greater inagricultural sites that lacked crop rotation or were in a continuous GR cropsystem. Rotating between two GR crops (e.g., corn and soybean) or rotatingto a non-GR crop resulted in less weed diversity than a continuous GR crop.The composition of the weed flora was more strongly related to location(geography) than any other parameter. The diversity of weed flora inagricultural sites with a history of GR crop production can be influenced byseveral factors relating to the specific method in which the GR trait isintegrated (cropping system, crop rotation, GR trait rotation), the specificweed species, and the geographical location. The finding that fields withcontinuous GR crops demonstrated greater weed diversity is contrary toarguments opposing the use of GE crops. These results justify furtherresearch to clarify the complexities of crops grown withherbicide-resistance traits, or more broadly, GE crops, to provide a morecomplete characterization of their culture and local adaptation.