We study a robust optimal reinsurance and investment problem for an ambiguity-averse insurer, where decisions are influenced by past capital flows (delay). The insurer’s surplus is modelled via diffusion approximation, and the financial market comprises a risk-free asset and a risky asset following geometric Brownian motion. To capture ambiguity aversion toward both insurance and financial risks, we employ the alpha-max/min mean-variance criterion, which generalizes the classical mean-variance approach by weighting worst-case and best-case scenarios under model uncertainty. Incorporating a time-delay structure into the wealth dynamics leads to an infinite dimensional stochastic control problem. Using stochastic control theory for delay systems, we derive an extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation and a verification theorem. Explicit, closed-form solutions for the robust optimal time-consistent reinsurance and investment strategies, along with the equilibrium value function, are obtained. Key findings include: (i) the equilibrium reinsurance strategy becomes more conservative as ambiguity aversion increases; (ii) the impact of ambiguity aversion of an individual on the investment strategy depends on the correlation between insurance and financial risks. When this dependence is weak, higher ambiguity aversion leads to a more conservative investment strategy. However, if the insurance market is highly ambiguous, a more ambiguity-averse insurer may surprisingly adopt a more aggressive investment strategy to diversify overall portfolio risk. Numerical analyses illustrate the effects of crucial parameters such as the ambiguity aversion coefficient, delay parameters and market coefficients of the optimal strategies, providing further economic interpretation and validation.

In this paper, we design a novel axiomatic approach to evaluating the joint risk of multiple insurance risks under dependence uncertainty. To be precise, we first establish a joint risk measure for non-negative multivariate risks, which we refer to as a (scalar) distortion joint risk measure. Then, we characterize it via a new set of axioms. Moreover, we introduce a new class of vector-valued distortion joint risk measures for non-negative multivariate risks and discuss their basic properties. Finally, comparisons with some existing vector-valued multivariate risk measures are made. It turns out that those vector-valued multivariate risk measures have forms of vector-valued distortion joint risk measures, respectively. This paper provides some relevant theoretical results about the evaluation of joint risk under dependence uncertainty.

This paper considers option valuation under finite mixture models in a discrete-time economy. Specifically, the Esscher transform is employed to select a pricing kernel. Novel finite mixture models with negative-shifted Gamma and negative-shifted inverse Gaussian distributions are developed. A hybrid finite mixture model that allows different parametric forms for component distributions is introduced to incorporate model uncertainty. An empirical characteristic function estimation method is employed to estimate the finite mixture models. Closed-form pricing formulas for a European call option are obtained for some finite mixture models. Empirical examples using data on the Bitcoin-USD prices are provided to illustrate an application of the proposed models to value Bitcoin options.

When overdispersion and correlation co-occur in longitudinal count data, as is often the case, an analysis method that can handle both phenomena simultaneously is needed. The correlated Poisson distribution (CPD) proposed by Drezner and Farnum (Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 22(11), 3051–3063, 1994) is a generalization of the classical Poisson distribution with the incorporation of an additional parameter that allows dependence between successive observations of the phenomenon under study. This parameter both measures the correlation and reflects the degree of dispersion. The classical Poisson distribution is obtained as a special case when the correlation is zero. We present an in-depth review of this CPD and discuss some methods to estimate the distribution parameters. The inclusion of regression components in this distribution is enabled by allowing one of the parameters to include available information concerning, in this case, automobile insurance policyholders. The proposed distribution can be viewed as an alternative to the Poisson, negative binomial, and Poisson-inverse Gaussian approaches. We then describe applications of the distribution, suggest it is appropriate for modeling the number of claims in an automobile insurance portfolio, and establish some new distribution properties.

We study two continuous-time, time-inconsistent problems for an individual who purchases life annuities and invests her wealth in a risky asset under the mean-variance criterion. In the first problem, the buyer may only purchase life annuities at a bounded, continuous rate, while in the second problem, the buyer may purchase any amount of life annuity income at any time, which results in a singular control problem. We find the individual’s time-consistent equilibrium control strategies explicitly for the two life-annuity problems by solving the corresponding extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman systems of equations. We also discuss the effects of parameters on the equilibrium strategies of the two life-annuity problems.

We study two continuous-time Stackelberg games between a life insurance buyer and seller over a random time horizon. The buyer invests in a risky asset and purchases life insurance, and she maximizes a mean-variance criterion applied to her wealth at death. The seller chooses the insurance premium rate to maximize its expected wealth at the buyer’s random time of death. We consider two life insurance games: one with term life insurance and the other with whole life insurance—the latter with pre-commitment of the constant investment strategy. In the term life insurance game, the buyer chooses her life insurance death benefit and investment strategy continuously from a time-consistent perspective. We find the buyer’s equilibrium control strategy explicitly, along with her value function, for the term life insurance game by solving the extended Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations. By contrast, in the whole life insurance game, the buyer pre-commits to a constant life insurance death benefit and a constant amount to invest in the risky asset. To solve the whole life insurance problem, we first obtain the buyer’s objective function and then we maximize that objective function over constant controls. Under both models, the seller maximizes its expected wealth at the buyer’s time of death, and we use the resulting optimal life insurance premia to find the Stackelberg equilibria of the two life insurance games. We also analyze the effects of the parameters on the Stackelberg equilibria, and we present some numerical examples to illustrate our results.

This paper investigates the precise large deviations of the net loss process in a two-dimensional risk model with consistently varying tails and dependence structures, and gives some asymptotic formulas which hold uniformly for all x varying in t-intervals. The study is among the initial efforts to analyze potential risk via large deviation results for the net loss process of the two-dimensional risk model, and can provide a novel insight to assess the operation risk in a long run by fully considering the premium income factors of the insurance company.

The theory of utility is a well-known method of constructing insurance premiums (see e.g., Newton et al. (1986) Actuarial Mathematics. Itasca, Illinois: The Society of Actuaries.). Furman and Zitikis ((2008) Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 42, 459–465.) proposed an alternative method using the mean value of a weighted random variable. According to this approach, for various choices of weighting, popular premiums such as net premium, modified variance premium, Esscher premium, and Kamps premium are obtained. On the other hand, some premiums cannot be obtained with this method, such as the premium of the exponential principle. In this paper, we provide a complementary theory by introducing a family of unimodal weighted distributions for which the mode is a premium principle.

Multivariate regular variation is a key concept that has been applied in finance, insurance, and risk management. This paper proposes a new dependence assumption via a framework of multivariate regular variation. Under the condition that financial and insurance risks satisfy our assumption, we conduct asymptotic analyses for multidimensional ruin probabilities in the discrete-time and continuous-time cases. Also, we present a two-dimensional numerical example satisfying our assumption, through which we show the accuracy of the asymptotic result for the discrete-time multidimensional insurance risk model.

In this paper, we propose two new optimal reinsurance models in which both premium budget constraints and the reinsurer’s risk limits are taken into account. To be precise, we assume that the reinsurance premium has an upper bound, and that the admissible ceded loss functions have a pre-specified upper limit. Moreover, we assume that the reinsurance premium principle is calculated by the expected value premium principle. Under the optimality criteria of minimizing the value at risk and conditional value at risk of the insurer’s total risk exposure, we derive the explicit optimal reinsurance treaties, which are layer reinsurance treaties. A new approach is developed to construct the optimal reinsurance treaties. Comparisons with existing studies are also made. Finally, we provide a numerical study based on real data and an example to illustrate the proposed models and results. Our work provides a novel generalization of several known achievements in the literature.

We study an optimal reinsurance problem for a diffusion model, in which the drift of the claim follows an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process. The aim of the insurer is to maximize the expected exponential utility of its terminal wealth. We consider two cases: full information and partial information. Full information occurs when the insurer directly observes the drift; partial information occurs when the insurer observes only its claims. By applying stochastic control and by solving the corresponding Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equations, we find the value function and the optimal reinsurance strategy under both full and partial information. We determine a relationship between the value function and reinsurance strategy under full information with the value function and reinsurance strategy under partial information.

The existence of moments of first downward passage times of a spectrally negative Lévy process is governed by the general dynamics of the Lévy process, i.e. whether it is drifting to $+\infty$, $-\infty$, or oscillating. Whenever the Lévy process drifts to $+\infty$, we prove that the $\kappa$th moment of the first passage time (conditioned to be finite) exists if and only if the $(\kappa+1)$th moment of the Lévy jump measure exists. This generalizes a result shown earlier by Delbaen for Cramér–Lundberg risk processes. Whenever the Lévy process drifts to $-\infty$, we prove that all moments of the first passage time exist, while for an oscillating Lévy process we derive conditions for non-existence of the moments, and in particular we show that no integer moments exist.

We consider a Lévy process Y(t) that is not continuously observed, but rather inspected at Poisson($\omega$) moments only, over an exponentially distributed time $T_\beta$ with parameter $\beta$. The focus lies on the analysis of the distribution of the running maximum at such inspection moments up to $T_\beta$, denoted by $Y_{\beta,\omega}$. Our main result is a decomposition: we derive a remarkable distributional equality that contains $Y_{\beta,\omega}$ as well as the running maximum process $\bar Y(t)$ at the exponentially distributed times $T_\beta$ and $T_{\beta+\omega}$. Concretely, $\overline{Y}(T_\beta)$ can be written as the sum of two independent random variables that are distributed as $Y_{\beta,\omega}$ and $\overline{Y}(T_{\beta+\omega})$. The distribution of $Y_{\beta,\omega}$ can be identified more explicitly in the two special cases of a spectrally positive and a spectrally negative Lévy process. As an illustrative example of the potential of our results, we show how to determine the asymptotic behavior of the bankruptcy probability in the Cramér–Lundberg insurance risk model.

We consider a risk model with a counting process whose intensity is a Markovian shot-noise process, to resolve one of the disadvantages of the Cramér–Lundberg model, namely the constant intensity of the Poisson process. Due to this structure, we can apply the theory of piecewise deterministic Markov processes on a multivariate process containing the intensity and the reserve process, which allows us to identify a family of martingales. Eventually, we use change of measure techniques to derive an upper bound for the ruin probability in this model. Exploiting a recurrent structure of the shot-noise process, even the asymptotic behaviour of the ruin probability can be determined.

We obtain series expansions of the q-scale functions of arbitrary spectrally negative Lévy processes, including processes with infinite jump activity, and use these to derive various new examples of explicit q-scale functions. Moreover, we study smoothness properties of the q-scale functions of spectrally negative Lévy processes with infinite jump activity. This complements previous results of Chan et al. (Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 150, 2011) for spectrally negative Lévy processes with Gaussian component or bounded variation.

We propose a generalized Cramér–Lundberg model of the risk theory of non-life insurance and study its ruin probability. Our model is an extension of that of Dubey (1977) to the case of multiple insureds, where the counting process is a mixed Poisson process and the continuously varying premium rate is determined by a Bayesian rule on the number of claims. We use two proofs to show that, for each fixed value of the safety loading, the ruin probability is the same as that of the classical Cramér–Lundberg model and does not depend on either the distribution of the mixing variable of the driving mixed Poisson process or the number of claim contracts.

In this paper we propose a general framework for modeling an insurance liability cash flow in continuous time, by generalizing the reduced-form framework for credit risk and life insurance. In particular, we assume a nontrivial dependence structure between the reference filtration and the insurance internal filtration. We apply these results for pricing and hedging non-life insurance liabilities in hybrid financial and insurance markets, while taking into account the role of inflation under the benchmarked risk-minimization approach. This framework offers at the same time a general and flexible structure, and an explicit and treatable pricing-hedging formula.

This study deals with the ruin problem when an insurance company having two business branches, life insurance and non-life insurance, invests its reserves in a risky asset with the price dynamics given by a geometric Brownian motion. We prove a result on the smoothness of the ruin probability as a function of the initial capital, and obtain for it an integro-differential equation understood in the classical sense. For the case of exponentially distributed jumps we show that the survival (as well as the ruin) probability is a solution of an ordinary differential equation of the fourth order. Asymptotic analysis of the latter leads to the conclusion that the ruin probability decays to zero in the same way as in the already studied cases of models with one-sided jumps.

A diffusion approximation to a risk process under dynamic proportional reinsurance is considered. The goal is to minimise the discounted time in drawdown; that is, the time where the distance of the present surplus to the running maximum is larger than a given level $d > 0$. We calculate the value function and determine the optimal reinsurance strategy. We conclude that the drawdown measure stabilises process paths but has a drawback as it also prevents surpassing the initial maximum. That is, the insurer is, under the optimal strategy, not interested in any more profits. We therefore suggest using optimisation criteria that do not avoid future profits.