The academic training of professionals influences the evolution and future direction of scientific disciplines. However, the training background and demographic composition of weed science faculty have not been systematically characterized. To address this, we conducted an Internet-based survey of weed science faculty at universities in the United States of America that included the academic fields of the degrees these faculty had received, the institutions that granted these degrees, which U.S. states or countries (if outside the United States) the degrees came from, the current academic rank of each faculty member, whether the faculty held leadership positions at their universities, and the gender of each faculty member. We identified 223 faculty at 50 universities. They received their degrees from institutions in 24 countries and 39 U.S. states. Most of their BS degrees were in agronomy and crop science or plant science, physiology, and genetics, with a few weed science and ecology degrees. Weed science and ecology representation increased at the MS level and became the most common doctoral training area. A plurality of the faculty were professors (48.9%), followed by assistant professors (28.7%), associate professors (19.7%), lecturers (0.9%) and unidentified rank (1.8%). Men made up 82.5% of the faculty with women at 17.5%. Men also held more of the leadership positions (84.4%) than women (15.6%). These findings provide the first comprehensive overview of the weed science academic workforce of the United States and establish a baseline for evaluating future trends in training pathways, disciplinary identity, workforce diversity, and potential continental or international comparisons.

Studies on authorship in archaeology have revealed inequalities that influence interpretations of archaeological narratives. Like other countries with rich archaeological heritage, Guatemala has drawn a diverse pool of researchers for decades, owing to its renowned Maya heritage. This study examines how gender and nationality shape knowledge production in Guatemalan archaeology. We analyze publication trends in Guatemala’s most prominent publication venue, the memoirs of the annual archaeology symposium, and two international journals: Latin American Antiquity and Estudios de Cultura Maya. We also incorporate alumni data from Guatemalan universities and responses from an exploratory survey of 103 local archaeologists regarding occupations, identities, and perceptions of inequalities. Our study reveals that although Guatemalan archaeology has been characterized by relative gender parity, the dissemination of academic knowledge has been predominantly led by men, even during periods when there have been more female professional archaeologists. These disparities likely stem from several factors, including occupational variations, traditional gender-role expectations, and institutional barriers. While men have traditionally led the dissemination of academic knowledge, women have achieved leadership in other domains. This study highlights the current state of diversity in Guatemalan archaeology and serves as a first step toward building a more inclusive archaeological community.

A growing number of people around the world identify, in some way, as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+); yet, these voices are noticeably absent from nonprofit research. To address issues of equity and the historic marginalization of LGBTQ+ people both societally and in the nonprofit sector, this manuscript seeks to answer the following questions: Why is it important to include sexual orientation and gender identity and expression (SOGIE) survey questions in nonprofit surveys? What are best practices for including SOGIE survey questions in nonprofit research? We present LGBTQ+ inclusive research strategies and suggested questions for inclusive SOGIE survey design. Though this article focuses primarily on surveying LGBTQ+ populations, it can also be instructive for general population surveys.

In STEM fields, women tend to leak out of the pipeline to the professoriate. In archaeology, however, robust databases and chronological control reveal that there is no leakage from earning a PhD to tenure-track positions. Nor is there a leak from assistant professor to associate professor. Nevertheless, men get hired as faculty in PhD programs more often than women. This is important because PhD programs are research-intensive and train future leaders. Furthermore, women PhD students have women as advisers more than often men and report advantages to this arrangement. Yet with fewer women faculty in PhD programs, women mentors are in short supply. Potential solutions to these problems target areas where bias can intervene. Specifically, job search committees should (1) wait until late in the process before consulting letters of recommendation, (2) standardize the valorization of coauthorship for both men and women, and (3) prioritize applicants who match the job description when creating long lists. Finally, implicit bias training is critically important, and mentoring should be continuous and enthusiastically positive.

Gender imbalance in the sciences is a problem that affects society as a whole. Attracting more women to science is a matter of welcoming 50% of the intellectual capacity of humankind. As institutions, science museums have the mission of expanding society access to scientific knowledge and encouraging the excitement of discovery. Further, they must also engage diverse audiences and address the many facets of inclusion. Therefore, it is fundamental to reflect on gender issues and adapt the content of exhibits and activities to be inclusive. The Museum of Astronomy and Related Sciences (MAST) has long been aware of its potential to promote social change and empowerment. Since 2015, MAST promotes a series of actions to stimulate discussion, acknowledge the contribution of female researchers to progress as well as encourage girls to explore scientific career paths through astronomy activities. All initiatives are built on theoretical perspectives of social inclusion, gender in sciences and informal science education. This article will review the “Girls in the Museum” action and present its most important results.

I am pleased to introduce this Symposium Edition of The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, which covers a wide variety of issues central to transgender health equity, including Dr. Jamison Green’s recent history of the impact of health policy on transgender communities, Dr. M. Killian Kinney, Ms. Taylor Pearson, and Prof. Julie Ralston Aoki’s transgender equity tool for legal policy analysis, and Prof. Elizabeth Kukura’s analysis of issues facing transgender, non-binary, and gender expansive people during pregnancy and childbirth.

Transgender and gender diverse (TGD), Black, and Latinx communities have long borne a disproportionate share of the U.S. HIV epidemic, yet these same key demographics are continually underrepresented in national PrEP prescriptions. Black, Latinx, and TGD individuals are also more likely to be uninsured, meaning that a proposed federal program to cover PrEP for people without insurance could provide significant benefit to potential PrEP users from these populations. However, coverage of PrEP costs alone will not end disparities in uptake. This commentary provides additional context and recommendations to maximize effectiveness of a national PrEP program for TGD, Black, and Latinx populations in the US.

This paper explores gender mainstreaming in the context of health policy and health variations between women and men. Despite the adoption of gender mainstreaming at international, regional and national scales since the Beijing Platform for Action in 1995, gender inequalities in health persist. The paper argues that the translation of gender mainstreaming as a global policy paradigm across and between policy scales has significance for health policies aiming to address gender. The paper suggests that while gender mainstreaming originated to address women's needs, the paradigm is founded on goals that do not translate in health policy; that the representation of the problem of gender in this global paradigm is problematic in a health context; and that the role of global networks in policy translation as part of this paradigm has led to the replacement of transformative ideals with technocratic solutions which shift the focus away from gender relations of power.