This systematic review evaluates specialized psychosocial and complex interventions for early bipolar disorder (BD), early borderline personality disorder (BPD), early depression, early psychosis, and first-episode mental illness in general (FEMI).

We included systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions with psychosocial components, excluding trials that focused on pharmacological-only interventions and stand-alone psychotherapies. Searches were conducted in January 2023 across five databases. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2 and risk of bias for RCTs using the Cochrane tool.

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria: seven reviews and three RCTs. High-to moderate-quality evidence supports complex psychosocial interventions combined with pharmacotherapy for early psychosis. The most robust effects were reductions in relapse and improvements in psychosocial functioning; additional benefits were observed for symptom burden, remission, treatment discontinuation, and hospital admissions. Benefits were most sustained in longer-duration, community-based programs. For early BD, limited evidence suggests that combining pharmacotherapy with family-focused therapy or structured psychoeducation may improve the course of illness and treatment satisfaction. One RCT in early BPD reported improved engagement with a developmentally tailored program. Two FEMI RCTs found that nurse-led psychoeducation and psychosocial programs improved in-patient duration, symptoms, insight, self-efficacy, quality of life, and engagement. No eligible studies addressed early-stage depression, indicating a notable evidence gap for multimodal psychosocial interventions.

Complex psychosocial interventions are strongly supported for early psychosis. Preliminary data in BD, BPD, and FEMI suggest consistent benefits for engagement, but further rigorous trials – especially in early depression – focusing on different outcomes – are required.

To describe and assess the overall results of the La Caixa Foundation and the ICO/UVIC Chair of Palliative Care (Former WHO Collaborating Centre) Program “Comprehensive Care of People with Advanced Chronic Conditions” at 15 years (2008–2023).

We used qualitative and quantitative methods, such as prospective, quasi-experimental, and pre-post test designs, to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions led by psychosocial teams providing support to existing healthcare services. Data were collected from the Program’s unique shared online information system, retrieving output and outcomes information, including data obtained from validated psychosocial evaluation instruments and semi-structured interviews with patients, relatives, professionals and other stakeholders, focusing on effectiveness, satisfaction, and perceived quality of different aspects of the Program, as well as outputs.

From 2008 to 2022, the Program implemented 65 teams in Spain and 11 in Portugal across all the provinces, with 379 full-time professionals. They saw 286,644 patients and 371,023 relatives, with a median intervention duration of 2.3 weeks. Patients’ mean (SD) age was 73.2 (14.9) years; 52.3% were women, and most had a cancer diagnosis (60.1%). After 3 consecutive interventions, patients showed significantly improved psychosocial parameters, according to the Assessment of PSS Needs (ENP-E) and Existential Loneliness Detection Scale (EDSOL). Patients, relatives, and stakeholders were highly satisfied. The Program has developed a Master’s degree that has trained over 250 professionals and conducted 371 courses/workshops and 302 lectures. The Program developed tools, manuals, and protocols that were published, available, and common to all professionals involved. It also developed innovative approaches responding to special settings and needs.

A care program within a collaborative framework between public health services and non-profit foundations is an effective, efficient, and feasible model for organizing the psychosocial and spiritual dimension of care for patients with advanced chronic conditions and their relatives.

The new psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for independence in dementia (NIDUS-Family) is a manualised dementia care intervention.

To evaluate whether goal-setting plus NIDUS-Family is more effective than the control condition (goal-setting and routine care) in supporting dyads’ (family carers and care recipients with dementia) attainment of personalised goals; and to determine participant-perceived goal relevance over 24 months.

We randomised dyads from community settings (2:1): to NIDUS-Family, a manualised psychological intervention tailored to goals that dyads set by selecting modules, delivered in 6–8 video call/telephone sessions over 6 months then 2–3 follow-ups monthly for 6 months; or to control. Outcomes were goal attainment scaling (GAS) (primary) at 18 and 24 months, functioning, quality of life, time until care home admission or death, carer anxiety and depression. Primary analysis, a mixed-effects model, accounted for randomisation group, study site, time, intervention arm facilitator and repeated measurements.

In the period 2020–2021, 204 participants were randomised to intervention and 98 to control; 164 (54.3%) and 141 (46.7%) dyads completed 18- and 24-month outcomes, respectively.

In the primary analysis, including 277 participants contributing 6-, 12-, 18- or 24-month outcomes, adjusted GAS mean differences (intervention–control) at 18 and 24 months were 11.78 (95% CI 6.64, 16.93) and 8.67 (95% CI 3.31, 14.02), respectively. Secondary outcome comparisons were not significant. The hazard ratio for dying or care home admission was 0.80 (95% CI 0.45, 1.42; intervention versus control), and 0.87 (95% CI 0.41, 1.82) and 0.59 (95% CI 0.26, 1.33) for death and care home admission, respectively. Among baseline GAS goals, carers considered 436 (78.0%) relevant at 18 months and 383 (78.5%) at 24 months.

NIDUS-Family improved attainment of GAS goals over 2 years.

ISRCTN11425138.

An increasing number of children and adolescents are prescribed second-generation antipsychotic medications, which may lead to cardiometabolic or other physical health impairments. It is unknown whether lifestyle interventions can prevent or manage these adverse effects.

To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for preventing or managing cardiometabolic risks and other adverse physical health outcomes in this population.

Four bibliographic databases were searched up to February 2024. Randomised controlled trials reporting a physical health outcome of children or adolescents (aged 6–17 years) taking antipsychotics and participating in a lifestyle intervention compared with treatment as usual (TAU) were eligible for inclusion. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess risk of bias. Data were synthesised via a random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

Four studies with a total of 370 participants were included. Most (75%) had a high risk of bias. Lifestyle interventions resulted in moderate but statistically non-significant reductions in participants’ body mass index (standard mean difference −0.70, 95% CI: −1.70 to 0.31) compared with TAU. Some studies reported improvements in other physical health outcomes favouring the intervention, although findings were inconsistent and varied across different measures. Reporting of secondary indicators of physical health, including participant or family health behaviours, was limited.

The effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for preventing or managing the cardiometabolic risk and other adverse physical health outcomes in this population is unclear due to the limited number of available trials, small samples and high risk of bias. Larger trials are needed.

Early Positive Approaches to Support (E-PAtS) is a co-produced group intervention supporting family carers of children (0–5 years) with additional developmental needs. This study compared online (n = 10) and in-person (n = 11) groups to investigate whether mode of delivery was associated with different outcomes. Participants were 98 family carers reporting on their mental well-being, self-efficacy, child symptoms and knowledge pre and post intervention. Generalised estimating equations compared outcomes between groups, controlling for group cluster effects.

Mental well-being improved significantly across both groups (d = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.63), as did an in-session measure concerning mechanisms of change (d = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.59) and all other assessed outcomes. There were no significant differences in measured outcomes between online and in-person groups.

Establishing the equivalence of in-person with online groups is an important first step for improving service reach and support access for families of children with additional developmental needs.

Psychosocial interventions are vital in treating severe mental illness, yet their use remains limited, and patients often lack adequate information about them. Patient-focused versions of clinical guidelines are designed to enhance mental health literacy and inform patients about available treatments, but these resources are underutilized. This study evaluated the impact of implementing a patient-focused psychosocial intervention guideline on empowerment, knowledge, and use of psychosocial interventions among individuals with severe mental illness.

Multicentre, cluster-randomised trial. The study population comprised adult patients with a severe mental disorder. The intervention group received a multimodal, structured, and protocol-led patient-focused guideline implementation, whereas the control group received treatment as usual. Data were analysed using hierarchical linear models. The primary outcome was the change in patients’ empowerment.

There was no significant intervention effect on empowerment (effect size=0.13, p=0.605), which increased slightly in both groups. The number of psychosocial interventions familiar to patients increased significantly more in the intervention group. Exploratory analyses suggest that patient empowerment could have been influenced by COVID-19-related stress, patient age, the severity of functional impairment, and migration background. The improvement in the utilisation of psychosocial interventions did not differ significantly between the intervention group (M=1.1, SD=2.5) and the control group (M=1.3, SD=2.4).

The implementation of a patient-focused psychosocial intervention guideline failed to enhance empowerment among service users. However, our analyses indicate that the intervention led to an improvement in patient knowledge with respect to guideline content. The availability of psychosocial interventions may have been significantly constrained by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The high comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with severe mental health conditions (MHCs) poses major challenges to providing effective care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where treatment options are limited.

The aim of this scoping review was to produce an overview of the current evidence on psychosocial interventions for people with comorbid MHCs and SUDs in LMICs.

The following databases were searched from their inception to 23 July 2024: PubMed/Medline, Global Health, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Index Medicus. We also searched for grey literature, using Google Scholar, ProQuest and Clinicaltrials.gov. Reporting was according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist. Studies were eligible if they focused on any psychosocial intervention targeting substance use in people with severe MHCs from LMICs. Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and included for data extraction.

Of the 6304 records screened by titles and abstracts, 138 full-text articles were assessed and 13 articles were included for data extraction. Many of the studies (n = 9) had a quasi-experimental design, and were from Latin America and South Asia. Four studies were randomised controlled trials. The primary outcomes examined were substance use abstinence, treatment engagement and retention, reduction in psychiatric symptoms, functioning and suicidal behaviours. Despite some heterogeneity in study designs, target populations and evaluated outcomes, interventions including various tobacco cessation programmes, screening and brief intervention with family support, and community-based programmes, have demonstrated positive outcomes in reducing tobacco, alcohol and khat use, respectively.

The review shows that there have been few initiatives to design and test psychosocial interventions for individuals with comorbid severe MHCs and SUDs in LMICs. There is a clear need to design and test feasible, acceptable, and effective interventions to address both severe MHCs and substance use when they co-occur.

Refugees and asylum seekers often experience trauma, leading to high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, the extent to which trauma and PTSD impacts social functioning, such as social relationships or engaging with community activities in new environments, remains unclear.

This systematic review aims to identify key areas of social functioning influenced by trauma and PTSD, with additional analyses stratified by trauma type.

A comprehensive search of five databases, grey literature sources, and reference lists was conducted in February 2025. Included papers explored the impact of trauma or PTSD on social functioning in adult displaced populations post-migration, within the last 30 years. Studies’ risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance checklist. Data were extracted on associations between trauma, PTSD and social functioning outcomes.

Of the studies, encompassing 15 394 participants, 38 met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis indicated that trauma and PTSD have an impact on multiple domains of social functioning, including post-migration living difficulties, everyday functioning, acculturation and integration, social relationships, and employment and education. War-related trauma predominantly affected psychosocial functioning and integration, whereas interpersonal trauma had a greater impact on social relationships. While most findings indicated a negative influence of trauma and PTSD on these areas, some evidence suggested the potential for post-traumatic growth.

The findings underscore the challenges displaced groups face, alongside the possibility of post-traumatic growth. Future research should focus on identifying factors that facilitate positive adaptation, informing interventions to support social integration in these vulnerable groups.

Peer-supported Open Dialogue (POD) integrates peer practitioners within mental health teams, fostering a collaborative, person-centred and social network approach to care. Although peer practitioners are increasingly involved in Open Dialogue, the role of peer practitioners within such teams remains underexplored.

This study aimed to explore (a) the experiences of peer practitioners working within Open Dialogue teams in the Open Dialogue: Development and Evaluation of a Social Intervention for Severe Mental Illness trial, and (b) the perspectives of non-peer Open Dialogue practitioners regarding peer involvement. Our further objectives were to understand the nature, degree and perceived impact of peer practitioner involvement in Open Dialogue.

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews and joint interviews with peer practitioners (n = 9). Additionally, excerpts from 11 interviews and 4 focus groups (n = 18), in which non-peer practitioners discussed peer practitioners’ contributions in Open Dialogue, were analysed. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes.

Three themes were developed. The first focuses on the perceived influence of peer practitioners on Open Dialogue network meetings; the second explores the opportunities and challenges of working as a peer practitioner in Open Dialogue, while the third details the perceived impact of peer practitioners on team and organisational culture.

Open Dialogue’s emphasis on a flattened hierarchy facilitates the integration of peer practitioners, enabling them to contribute meaningfully to network meetings and team culture. Despite the overall positive experiences, peers still faced common challenges faced by those in other services, such as low pay and occasional instances of a compromised, flattened hierarchy.

Understanding what psychosocial interventions can reduce self-harm and suicide within in-patient mental health settings can be challenging, due to clinical demands and the large volume of published reviews.

To summarise evidence from systematic reviews on psychosocial and ward-level interventions (excluding environmental modifications) for self-harm and suicide that may enhance patient safety in in-patient mental health settings.

We systematically searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and CDSR (2013–2023) for systematic reviews on self-harm and suicide prevention interventions that included in-patient data. Review quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, primary study overlap via an evidence matrix, and evidence strength evaluated (GRADE algorithm). Findings were narratively synthesised, with input from experts-by-experience throughout (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023442639).

Thirteen systematic reviews (seven meta-analyses, six narrative), comprising over 160 000 participants, were identified. Based on quantitative reviews, cognitive–behavioural therapy reduces repeat self-harm by follow-up, and dialectical behaviour therapy decreases the frequency of self-harm. Narrative review evidence suggested that post-discharge follow-up, as well as system and ward-based interventions (e.g. staff training) may reduce suicide and/or self-harm. However, review quality varied, patient involvement was lacking and methodological quality of trials informing reviews was predominately low. Overlap was slight (covered area 12.4%).

The effectiveness of interventions to prevent self-harm and suicide in in-patient settings remains uncertain due to variable quality reviews, evidence gaps, poor methodological quality of primary studies and a lack of pragmatic trials and co-production. There is an urgent need for better, co-designed research within in-patient mental health settings.

To truly understand the efficacy of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) psychoeducation, we need to know what is commonly included in it. This scoping review aims to describe the content of psychoeducation interventions for ADHD in published research. A literature search was conducted to identify relevant papers. Descriptions of psychoeducation aimed at children, parents/carers, adults and teachers were identified and compared narratively.

After screening, 57 papers were identified for data extraction and coding. Content themes included ‘information about ADHD’; ‘practical advice’; ‘impact of ADHD’; ‘treatment of ADHD’; ‘co-occurrence’; and ‘self-image/self-esteem’. ‘Information about ADHD’ and ‘practical advice’ were the most common themes, with variance on inclusion of other themes. Most of the identified research involved psychoeducation for parents of children with ADHD.

This review provides greater understanding of the content and delivery of ADHD psychoeducation. Further research could use this understanding to ascertain the efficacy of different content themes in supporting those with ADHD.

Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) are recognised for their potential in treating dementia symptoms. However, little is known about the extent of their use. In this study, we conducted structured interviews with people with dementia and their family caregivers (n = 50), professional caregivers (n = 42) and dementia care coordinators (n = 42) on the use of 14 NPIs.

Cognitive stimulation/training, physical activity and occupational therapy were implemented by most participants, whereas neurofeedback, drama therapy and phototherapy were rarely used. Most NPIs were carried out weekly. People with dementia and their caregivers reported using significantly fewer NPIs than other participants (P < 0.001). Participants perceived effects for, on average, 90.3% (s.d. = 31.3%) of the NPIs that they used.

Providing targeted support and funding might help to increase the use of NPIs by family caregivers as well as in institutional care settings.