To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article critically examines the challenges of trade union “just transition” (JT) policies in the context of the ecological crisis. While JT policies have grown in prominence, especially in the Global North, they do not adequately address the ecological crisis since they focus exclusively on decarbonisation without recognising that Green Growth, by reducing emissions increases environmental destruction created by the extraction of ever more minerals and metals. JT policies are further constrained by national boundaries and by a policy centred on jobs only, without acknowledging the broader needs for dignified lives and a regenerative relationship between labour and nature. Research into workers’ visions for the future shows that workers long for cooperation, democratisation from below, a connection of local and global solidarity, and more time to care for themselves and others. The author suggests that unions could connect with such visions to develop transformative, globally coordinated JT strategies that centre on cooperation and self-determination, allowing them to move away from growth imperatives towards a regenerative economy that centres on care for both, people and nature.
Climate change and its mitigation has become one of the most pressing challenges facing our societies. Shocks and phenomena related to climate change cause important economic losses due to damages to property infrastructure, disruptions to supply chains, lower productivity, and migration. Climate Economics and Finance offers a comprehensive analysis of how climate change impacts the economy and financial systems. Focusing on the monetary and financial implications of climate change, it addresses critical yet often overlooked areas such as greenflation, public and private financing of the transition process, and the challenges faced by central banks and supervisors in preventing and managing associated risks. It delves into the challenges that emerging and developing economies face in accessing climate finance, highlighting innovative financial and de-risking solutions. Synthesizing state-of-the-art research and ongoing policy discussions, this book offers a clear and accessible entry point into the intersection of climate and finance.
In March 1989, US Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady introduced a plan enabling distressed sovereigns to restructure unsustainable debts through 'Brady bonds.' Today, growing debt vulnerabilities have prompted calls for a modern Brady Plan to facilitate sovereign debt restructurings. This Element examines the macroeconomic impact of the original Brady Plan by comparing outcomes for ten Brady countries against forty other emerging markets and developing economies. It finds that following the first Brady-led restructuring in 1990, participating countries saw reductions in public and external debt burdens, alongside output and productivity growth anchored by strong economic reforms. The analysis reveals the existence of a 'Brady multiplier,' where declines in overall debt burdens exceeded initial face-value reductions. While similar mechanisms could again deliver substantial debt stock reductions during acute solvency crises, Brady-style solutions alone would not address current challenges related to creditor coordination, domestic reform barriers, and the rise of domestic debt, among others.
How should resource-constrained manufacturers renew operations under mounting innovation pressure? We theorize and test a contingent model in which market pressure affects operational innovation indirectly through two pathways, technology investment (exploitation) and human-capital utilization (exploration), and in which firm size conditions both pathways. Using Eurobarometer 433 data on 2,213 European manufacturing firms, we estimate a conditional process model combining ordinary least squares and logistic regressions. We find a negative direct effect of pressure on operational innovation, but positive mediated effects via technology and human capital; the technology pathway is substantively stronger. Size matters: larger firms more effectively translate pressure into technology investment, whereas smaller firms rely relatively more on human capital, implying performance parity for sequential strategies when resources are tight. We contribute boundary conditions to ambidexterity theory and offer actionable guidance: small and medium-sized enterprises should sequence renewal by first mobilising human capabilities, then adding technologies; large firms can pursue ambidextrous investments.
The Latent Position Model (LPM) is a popular approach for the statistical analysis of network data. A central aspect of this model is that it assigns nodes to random positions in a latent space, such that the probability of an interaction between each pair of individuals or nodes is determined by their distance in this latent space. A key feature of this model is that it allows one to visualize nuanced structures via the latent space representation. The LPM can be further extended to the Latent Position Cluster Model (LPCM), to accommodate the clustering of nodes by assuming that the latent positions are distributed following a finite mixture distribution. In this paper, we extend the LPCM to accommodate missing network data and apply this to non-negative discrete weighted social networks. By treating missing data as “unusual” zero interactions, we propose a combination of the LPCM with the zero-inflated Poisson distribution. Statistical inference is based on a novel partially collapsed Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, where a Mixture-of-Finite-Mixtures (MFM) model is adopted to automatically determine the number of clusters and optimal group partitioning. Our algorithm features a truncated absorb-eject move, which is a novel adaptation of an idea commonly used in collapsed samplers, within the context of MFMs. Another aspect of our work is that we illustrate our results on 3-dimensional latent spaces, maintaining clear visualizations while achieving more flexibility than 2-dimensional models. The performance of this approach is illustrated via three carefully designed simulation studies, as well as four different publicly available real networks, where some interesting new perspectives are uncovered.
We analyse the monetary-fiscal policy mix in post-war Europe, focusing on France and Italy, to trace the historical dynamics of debt and inflation. Using a Markov-switching DSGE model, we identify distinct policy regimes: a Passive Monetary-Active Fiscal (PM/AF) regime before the late 1980s/early 1990s, an Active Monetary-Passive Fiscal (AM/PF) regime associated with central bank independence and EMU convergence, and a third regime marked by the ELB and active fiscal measures aimed at recovery. Simulations reveal that the PM/AF regime in France led to price volatility but stabilised debt, while AM/PF curbed inflation at the cost of rising debt. In contrast, Italy’s procyclical fiscal policy in downturns exacerbated imbalances, aggregate volatility, and low growth. We further assess the implications of policy credibility and uncertainty.
In behavioural economics, sludge is a novel umbrella term (introduced by Nobel laureate Richard Thaler) referring to the subjectively experienced excessive frictions in decision-making. Sludge researchers propose incorporating insights from institutional economics by linking sludge to subjective transaction costs that align with the subjectivist tradition in transaction cost theory. However, sludge research relies entirely on the i-frame: an individualistic and internalist (inside-the-brain) notion of decision-making. Although popular, the i-frame results in critical shortcomings and contradictions in sludge analysis. In contrast, I propose a systemic (s-frame) perspective for studying sludge. Along with a subjectivist view, sludge should be understood as an outcome of complex and evolving rule systems. Instead of focusing solely on the cost side of sludge, sludge analysis should be developed to include not only transaction costs but also transaction benefits that are unevenly distributed among heterogeneous actors. Furthermore, decision-making and sludge perception are not purely internal processes but socially extended cognitive processes governed by cognitive institutions and embedded in dynamic social interactions. Shifting the focus of sludge research toward the s-frame will allow us to understand sludge in all its institutional and socio-cognitive complexities.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Financial stability is essential for sustainable economic growth, and prudential policies have been reinforced since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) to safeguard this stability. The Basel III framework introduced stringent capital, liquidity, and risk management requirements for banks, strengthening their resilience. In the face of growing climate-related risks, central banks and supervisory authorities must ensure that financial systems remain stable. Extreme weather events and abrupt transitions to a low-carbon economy can lead to significant financial losses, including asset stranding and increased defaults, threatening overall financial stability. Central banks and supervisory authorities must integrate climate risks into their financial supervision frameworks, adapting existing tools to manage these complex, systemic risks. Prudential responses must encompass both individual institutions and broader financial systems to mitigate the impact of climate change on financial stability. Ensuring a resilient financial system is crucial for maintaining economic stability in the transition to a low-carbon future.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Scientists have long warned about the severe environmental consequences if global temperatures continue to rise. According to the 2021 IPCC report, the Earth's temperature has increased by 1.1°C above preindustrial levels, and the world is projected to exceed 1.5°C within two decades, even with emission reduction efforts. International initiatives, starting with the 1992 UNFCCC and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, laid the groundwork for climate action. The 2015 Paris Agreement, a pivotal moment, set a goal to limit warming to below 2°C, ideally 1.5°C, through nationally determined contributions (NDCs). Addressing climate change requires systemic shifts in economic structures, moving away from fossil fuels toward renewable energy, promoting decarbonization, and emphasizing resource efficiency. While transitioning to a low-carbon economy poses initial costs, the long-term benefits include reduced environmental damage, better health, and enhanced energy efficiency. The ongoing global cooperation and economic transformation are crucial for mitigating climate change impacts.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Human activities have caused significant changes in the climate system, leading to more frequent and intense extreme weather events such as heatwaves, droughts, and tropical cyclones. Global warming poses escalating risks, with even a 1°C –2°C increase above preindustrial levels disrupting ecosystems and threatening coral reefs, polar ice caps, and species. Beyond 3°C, the impacts are expected to turn catastrophic, risking ecological collapse and mass displacement. Climate change also introduces severe physical risks to economies by damaging infrastructure, disrupting agriculture, and increasing costs related to property damage and healthcare. Rising sea levels threaten coastal areas, while extreme weather events fuel price increases and food shortages. Despite challenges in quantifying these economic impacts, interdisciplinary research and advanced modeling aim to enhance assessment accuracy. Urgent global action is required to mitigate climate change and protect ecosystems and economies from irreversible damage.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
This chapter examines early decisions made by the Trump Administration that could have an impact on the financing of terrorism. The chapter also ties together the previous chapters – specifically looking at overlaps, regulatory, technological, or other in the area of terrorist financing and the countering of it.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Climate change presents significant risks to economic and financial stability, compelling central banks to address its impacts on inflation and output. As climate-induced disruptions – such as extreme weather events and carbon taxes – affect price stability, central banks must adapt their monetary policies to mitigate these risks. Climate change can trigger inflationary pressures, alter labor productivity, and impact capital stocks, influencing the natural interest rate and overall supply. The ecological transition also poses challenges, potentially causing stagflationary episodes that complicate central banks’ dual mandates of price and output stability. Consequently, central banks are increasingly integrating climate risks into their frameworks, with the aim of maintaining their inflation-targeting objectives while supporting the green transition. Effective policy responses require a deep understanding of climate-related risks, enabling central banks to adjust their monetary tools and align their operations with sustainability goals. Addressing these challenges becomes essential to strengthening economic resilience in the face of climate change.
This chapter examines the mechanics of how the US government, specifically the State Department, sanctions terrorists pursuant to two legal mechanisms – terrorist designations of Foreign Terrorist Organizations and the sanctioning of individuals and organizations pursuant to E.O. 13224.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Climate finance has grown significantly in recent years, reaching $1.8 trillion in 2023. However, this remains insufficient to meet the Paris Agreement's temperature goals, particularly with net-zero emissions by 2050 requiring an annual investment of $5 trillion. Current investments in renewable energy remain lower than those in fossil fuels, contributing to a substantial global investment gap. While redirecting investments from carbon-intensive sectors could reduce this gap, the remaining shortfall is still projected at 2 percent to 3 percent of global GDP annually. Emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs), face greater financial constraints in addressing climate challenges, with most climate finance concentrated in developed regions and China. Despite sufficient liquidity in global capital markets, private sector contributions to climate finance in these regions remain low, often due to limited fiscal space and financing access. Innovative financing solutions and public–private partnerships are critical to mobilize the necessary resources for green investments and climate adaptation in these vulnerable regions.
Stéphane Dees, Banque de France and Bordeaux School of Economics, University of Bordeaux, France,Selin Ozyurt-Miller, International Finance Corporation
Emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) face significant obstacles in attracting the capital necessary to achieve climate and development goals, requiring at least $1 trillion annually for a successful green transition. Investment needs escalate further when adaptation and resilience measures are included, placing vulnerable populations at greater risk despite their minimal contributions to climate change. Current climate financing to EMDEs is insufficient, primarily public, focused on mitigation over adaptation, and often delivered as debt. Barriers such as high credit risk and regulatory uncertainties exacerbate the investment gap. Thus, private sector engagement is crucial to meet the Paris Agreement targets. Innovative financial strategies, including blended finance, can mobilize private capital by using concessional funds to enhance project viability. A coordinated global approach, involving partnerships among governments, international financial institutions, and the private sector, is essential for effectively addressing climate investment needs and fostering sustainable development in EMDEs.