To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
General Construction for Refracted Ray. The two-circle method of finding the direction of a ray refracted at a plane surface is very old, but seems to be now almost forgotten. It is particularly convenient when the refraction of several rays is to be determined, and its application to the case of a prism is especially elegant and leads to a simple self-contained proof of the condition for minimum deviation.
Let $A$ be a graded, commutative Hopf algebra. We study an action of the symmetric group $\sSi_n$ on the tensor product of $n-1$ copies of $A$; this action was introduced by the second author in 1 and is relevant to the study of commutativity conditions on ring spectra in stable homotopy theory 2.
We show that for a certain class of Hopf algebras the cohomology ring $H^*(\sSi_n;A^{\otimes n-1})$ is independent of the coproduct provided $n$ and $(n-2)!$ are invertible in the ground ring. With the simplest coproduct structure, the group action becomes particularly tractable and we discuss the implications this has for computations.
In [1], R. L. Goodstein has extended some well-known theorems on functions and equations in a Boolean algebra to the case of a distributive lattice L with 0 and 1. The purpose of this paper is to prove that most of Goodstein's theorems, as well as some additional results, are still valid in the case when L is not required to have least and greatest elements.
We shall extend some of the results of (7) to the case of multiple alleles, our primary concern being that of polyploidy combined with multiple alleles. Generalisations often tend to make the computations more involved as is expected. Fortunately here, the attempt to generalise has led to a new method which not only handles the case of multiple alleles, but is an improvement over the method used in (7) for the special case of polyploidy with two alleles. This method which consists essentially of expressing certain elements of the algebra in a so-called “ factored ” form, gives greater insight into the structure of a polyploidy algebra, and avoids a great deal of the computation with binomial coefficients, e.g. see (7), p. 46.
Sr denotes an infinite space of r dimensions. Such a space is divided into two regions by a Sr−1. An infinite line is divided into n + 1 regions by n points. An infinite plane or other surface topically equivalent to it is divided into two regions by an infinite line.
which we denote by [a1, . …, ak] or briefly by [a], of the integer n, we can construct a shape which has a1 spaces in the first row, a2 in the second row, . …, ak in the kth and last row. Thus the shape corresponding to the partition [5, 3, 3, 2] of 13 has the form:
By the work of Taskinen (see [4, 5]), we know that there is a Fréchet space E such that Lb(E, l2) is not a (DF)-space. Moreover there is a Fréchet–Montel space F such that is not (DF). In this second example, the duality theorem of Buchwalter (cf. [2, §45.3]) can be applied to obtain that and hence is a (gDF)-space (cf. [1, Ch. 12 or 3, Ch. 8]). The (gDF)-spaces were introduced by several authors to extend the (DF)-spaces of Grothendieck and to provide an adequate frame to consider strict topologies.
A partially ordered set, is ω-chain complete if, for every countable chain, or ω-chain, in P, the least upper bound of C, denoted by sup C, exists. Notice that C could be empty, so an ω-chain complete partially ordered set has a least element, denoted by 0.
where w is a vector with n components and A is an n by n matrix is said to have z = 0 as a regular singular point if there exists a fundamental matrix of the form
such that S is holomorphic at z = 0 and R is a constant matrix ((1), p. 111; (2), p. 73). For such systems A will have at most a pole at z = 0 and we may write
where p is an integer, Ã is holomorphic at z = 0, and Ã(0) ≠ 0. However, the converse is not true. When p ≦ − 1, A is holomorphic at z = 0, and every fundamental matrix is holomorphic at z = 0. If p ≧ 1, the non-negative integer p is called (after Poincaré) the rank of the singularity and there is a significant difference between the cases p = 0 and p ≧ 1. If p = 0 the linear differential system (1) is known to have z = 0 as a regular singular point ((1), p. 111) ; whereas, if p ≧ 1, z = 0 may or may not be a regular singular point.
This is the problem discussed in my paper bearing the not very happy title “On the different non-linear arrangements of eight men on a chess-board”, which was read to the Edinburgh Mathematical Society on 14th March 1890, and is printed in its Transactions, Vol. VIII, p. 30. At that time I was not aware that the problem had been discussed by any previous writer, and I treated it as an entirely new one. I have since learnt that a good deal has been written about it, and I propose on the present occasion to give briefly the history of the problem, and the results which have been arrived at; also to communicate some new results which I have obtained.