To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Given a complex Banach space X, which operators T ∈ B(X) have nontrivial closed invariant subspaces? This question, the so-called invariant subspace problem, is the topic of this brief last chapter. Until fairly recently, it was not known whether there was any operator T without a non-trivial (closed) invariant subspace, and it is still not known whether there is such an operator on a (complex) Hilbert space.
Much of the effort concerning the invariant-subspace problem has gone into proving positive results, i.e. results claiming the existence of invariant subspaces for operators satisfying certain conditions. Our main aim in this chapter is to present the most beautiful of these positive results, Lomonosov's theorem, whose proof is surprisingly simple.
As we remarked earlier, the Riesz theory of compact operators on Banach spaces culminated in a very pleasing theorem, Theorem 13.8, which nevertheless, did not even guarantee the existence of a single nontrivial invariant subspace. This deficiency was put right, with plenty to spare, in Chapter 14, but only for a compact normal operator on a Hilbert space. Now we return to the general case to prove Lomonosov's theorem, which claims considerably more than that every compact operator has a non-trivial invariant subspace. Before we present this result, we need some definitions and a basic result about compact convex sets.
As in Chapters 13 and 14, all spaces considered in this chapter are complex spaces. Furthermore, as every linear operator on a finitedimensional complex vector space has an eigenvector, we shall consider only infinite-dimensional spaces.
This book has grown out of the Linear Analysis course given in Cambridge on numerous occasions for the third-year undergraduates reading mathematics. It is intended to be a fairly concise, yet readable and down-to-earth, introduction to functional analysis, with plenty of challenging exercises. In common with many authors, I have tried to write the kind of book that I would have liked to have learned from as an undergraduate. I am convinced that functional analysis is a particularly beautiful and elegant area of mathematics, and I have tried to convey my enthusiasm to the reader.
In most universities, the courses covering the contents of this book are given under the heading of Functional Analysis; the name Linear Analysis has been chosen to emphasize that most of the material in on linear functional analysis. Functional Analysis, in its wide sense, includes partial differential equations, stochastic theory and non-commutative harmonic analysis, but its core is the study of normed spaces, together with linear functionals and operators on them. That core is the principal topic of this volume.
Functional analysis was born around the turn of the century, and within a few years, after an amazing burst of development, it was a wellestablished major branch of mathematics. The early growth of functional analysis was based on 19th century Italian function theory, and was given a great impetus by the birth of Lebesgue's theory of integration.
Dedicated to the memory of Professor Katsutoshi Takahashi
In this paper, we introduce p-hyponormal tuples in the sense of D. Xia. Furthermore we extend Putnam’s inequality to these tuples and show an equivalence relation of two spectra.
Consider a group presentation: $$\hat{[Pscr]}\tfrm{=<\tfbf{x};}\tfbf{r}\tfrm{>}$$. Here x is a set and r is a set of non-empty, cyclically reduced words on the alphabet x ∪ x−1 (where x−1 is a set in one-to-one correspondence x[harr]x−1 with x). We assume throughout that $\hat{[Pscr]}$ is finite. Let $\hat{F}$ be the free group on x (thus $\hat{F}$ consists of free equivalence classes [W] of word on x∪x−1), and let N be the normal closure of {[R] : R∈r} in $\hat{F}$. Then the group G=G($\hat{[Pscr]}$) defined by $\hat{[Pscr]}$ is $\hat{F}\tfrm{/}N$. We will write W1 =GW2 if [W1]N=[W2]N.
A finite group G can be represented as a group of automorphisms of a compact Riemann surface, that is, G acts on a Riemann surface. The symmetric genus σ(G) is the minimum genus of any Riemann surface on which G acts (possibly reversing orientation).
A group G is said to be a minimal non-FC group, if G contains an infinite conjugacy class, while every proper subgroup of G merely has finite conjugacy classes. The structure of imperfect minimal non-FC groups is quite well-understood. These groups are in particular locally finite. At the other end of the spectrum, a perfect locally finite minimal non-FC group must be a p-group. And it has been an open question for quite a while now, whether such groups exist or not.
When a thin layer of normal (non-superconducting) material is placed between layers of superconducting material, a superconducting-normal-superconducting junction is formed. This paper considers a model for the junction based on the Ginzburg–Landau equations as the thickness of the normal layer tends to zero. The model is first derived formally by averaging the unknown variables in the normal layer. Rigorous convergence is then established, as well as an estimate for the order of convergence. Numerical results are shown for one-dimensional junctions.
In the small diffusion limit ε→0, metastable dynamics is studied for the generalized Burgers problem
formula here
Here u=u(x, t) and f(u) is smooth, convex, and satisfies f(0)=f′(0)=0. The choice f(u)=u2/2 has been shown previously to arise in connection with the physical problem of upward flame-front propagation in a vertical channel in a particular parameter regime. In this context, the shape y=y(x, t) of the flame-front interface satisfies u=−yx. For this problem, it is shown that the principal eigenvalue associated with the linearization around an equilibrium solution corresponding to a parabolic-shaped flame-front interface is exponentially small. This exponentially small eigenvalue then leads to a metastable behaviour for the time-dependent problem. This behaviour is studied quantitatively by deriving an asymptotic ordinary differential equation characterizing the slow motion of the tip location of a parabolic-shaped interface. Similar metastability results are obtained for more general f(u). These asymptotic results are shown to compare very favourably with full numerical computations.