To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Two months after its premiere in Leipzig, Ernst Krenek’s Leben des Orest (1930) came to the Berlin Kroll Opera, a notorious centre for experimental, modernist productions. Inevitably, critics compared the two productions, much to the Berlin production’s detriment. In particular, critics faulted the Berlin stage designs by Greek-Italian painter Giorgio de Chirico. I argue that this reception reflected a fundamental divergence in Krenek and de Chirico’s neoclassicism, which was only exacerbated by how neither Krenek nor de Chirico’s neoclassicism aligned with pre-existing expectations about the Kroll Opera’s production aesthetic, as exemplified in Igor Stravinsky’s Oedipus Rex (staged at the Kroll in 1928). Attending to these differences not only explains the troubled reception of Leben des Orest at the Kroll, but also provides fertile ground to examine the complicated and sometimes contradictory meanings ascribed to neoclassicism in the interwar period, especially as it moved between media and across national borders.
J. S. Bach’s Cello Suites, like his English Suites, all follow the same basic format: prelude, allemande, courante, sarabande, and gigue, with various modern dances known as “galanteries” placed in the penultimate position. Bach insisted that his students study a number of suites to develop an intimate knowledge of these various genres of stylized dances. Writings by his North German contemporaries—especially Johann Gottfried Walther’s Musicalisches Lexikon (1732) and Johann Mattheson’s Der vollkommene Capellmeister (1739)—offer some sense of how Bach may have understood the characters and styles of each dance type. Bach’s suites often exemplify elements of unity across the various movements, with musical motives or figures introduced in the prelude that recur in various ways across a suite. These elements of unity suggest the influence of a technique of musical variation discussed in Friedrich Erhardt Niedt’s Musikalische Handleitung (1706). The chapter closes with a complete analysis of Cello Suite No. 4 (BWV1010), illuminating harmony, form, motives, and possible Christian symbolism in the Prelude.
This chapter traces the transmission, performance history, and reception of J. S. Bach’s Cello Suites up through the dawn of the recording era. Composed around 1720, the Cello Suites circulated for their first century only in manuscript copies and were therefore only known by people with connections to the composer’s students. Various books and reference materials highlight the Sonatas and Partitas and Cello Suites in works lists and appraisals of the composer’s work, but these pieces were not widely played. The first published editions appeared starting in the 1820s, initially presenting the Cello Suites as instrumental studies. Subsequent editions with extensive editorial expressive markings and sometimes with added piano accompaniment aspired to adapt the Cello Suites to suit contemporaneous tastes, serving to usher them gradually into the concert hall. Starting around the 1860s, individual movements or groups of movements (and rarely complete suites) were performed in concerts primarily in Germany, England, and France. These performances were initially met with a mixed critical reception: While some concerts received rave reviews, other critics considered the Cello Suites to be historical curiosities or to be better suited for instrumental study than concert performances.
Whereas Bach’s Violin Solos are preserved in a calligraphic autograph manuscript, the lack of a surviving autograph of the Cello Suites has long been a problem for performers and critical editors alike. The Cello Suites survive in four manuscript copies, which musicians consult in facsimile copies to guide their choices about discrepant articulations, ornaments, and notes. For some 150 years, most cellists and editors have taken the manuscript copied by the composer’s second wife, Anna Magdalena Bach (Source A), to be a kind of surrogate for the lost autograph, despite the fact that it contains numerous inconsistencies as well as slur markings that are ambiguous or apparently inaccurate. A recent edition by Andrew Talle (2018) has reevaluated the four sources, drawing particular attention to Sources C and D, which had long been disregarded due to their geographical and temporal distance from the composer. However, these manuscripts were copied by excellent professional scribes working from another (now lost) manuscript in the possession of Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. They moreover preserve various details, clarifications, and embellishments that were added through the composer’s initiative, probably in the context of lessons or music making, and which are not preserved in Anna Magdalena Bach’s copy.
J. S. Bach’s tenure as Capellmeister in Cöthen, with its focus on secular music, afforded an opportunity to explore the violin and cello as solo instruments. While his Sonatas and Partitas for Solo Violin represent the pinnacle of an established German tradition, the Cello Suites are among the earliest music composed for unaccompanied cello and may have been inspired partly by unaccompanied music for viola da gamba (pièces de viole). Bach’s Violin Solos and Cello Suites are both “opus collections”—sets of (usually six) pieces exemplifying his mastery of a particular genre or instrument. An obituary coauthored by Carp Philipp Emanuel Bach and Johann Friedrich Agricola illustrates the special importance the composer attached to these pieces. While Bach was best known during his lifetime as an organist, he had intimate knowledge and full mastery of the violin. There is no record of Bach playing cello, but his composition of virtuoso suites that draw a maximum musical effect from such minimal instrumental resources suggest an intimate knowledge of that instrument. Moreover, during Bach’s lifetime, an instrument called “viola da spalla”—considered a type of cello but played similarly to the violin—could have enabled a violinist to play the Cello Suites.
The Catalan cellist Pablo Casals, reputed to have “discovered” J. S. Bach’s Cello Suites, is better understood as their most influential popularizer. Through his extensive concert tours in the early twentieth century and culminating in his complete recording of the cycle in the 1930s, he solidified their place in concert life and established paradigms that remain influential today. Among these are the practice of only performing complete suites, with all repeats and without piano accompaniment. Casals’s exile to Prades, France, in protest of Franco’s dictatorship, abruptly ended his concert career and established Casals as a humanitarian figure, inspiring later generations of cellists who used the Cello Suites to advocate for peace and an end to human suffering. Examples include Mstislav Rostropovich’s impromptu performance after the fall of the Berlin Wall, Yo-Yo Ma’s performance at the US-Mexico border and outside the Russian embassy, and Denys Karachevtsev’s performance on the heavily bombed-out streets of Kharkiv. Cellists have recently experimented with playing the Cello Suites in unusual venues such as subways, mountaintops, and in community settings worldwide. The Cello Suites’ global resonance is evinced by the wide range of art and popular media they have inspired.
Edward MacDowell held a liminal position in the late nineteenth century, well-known and active in Europe but also championed as a leading figure of US musical identity. In the first concert of his 1887 American Festival, conductor Frank Van der Stucken programmed MacDowell’s Hamlet, positioning MacDowell and his composition as important components of American music. However, MacDowell’s symphonic poem holds layers of cultural meaning in its various associations with European artistic, dramatic and musical figures.
MacDowell composed Hamlet. Ophelia. Zwei Gedichte für grosses Orchester in Frankfurt in 1884, shortly after he and his wife returned from their honeymoon in London, a city imbued with cultural Wagnerism. The style and motivic material of MacDowell’s symphonic poem are reminiscent of Wagner’s Tristan und Isolde, suggesting an aesthetic and thematic connection. Furthermore, MacDowell dedicated his composition to the famous Shakespearean actors, Henry Irving and Ellen Terry, indicating their impact on his work.
These rich cultural layers of MacDowell’s Hamlet implicate issues of national identity and aesthetic value, issues that clarify the competing positions of the composer: as a nuanced cosmopolitan composer exhibiting English, French and Germanic elements in his work; as a US composer valorized to promote national identity; and as a proponent of aesthetic value transcending national origin. This article explores each cultural layer of MacDowell’s Hamlet and Ophelia to position the symphonic poem as a microcosm of the rich cultural landscape of the United States at the close of the nineteenth century.
This article examines the paradoxical relationship between discourses of sincerity and an aesthetics of imperfection in twenty-first-century pop culture, with special attention to the Russian music scene. We focus on the career of cult musician Sergei Shnurov to address this broader question: What do present-day anxieties around sincerity tell us about pop-cultural production and consumption processes? First, we offer a genealogy of post-Soviet sincerity rhetoric. We then use this genealogy to unpack the approach to sincere expression that Shnurov and his critics and fans adopt. Two recurring artistic strategies stand out. First, Shnurov creates a sincere effect by insisting on insincerity. Second, he amplifies this ‘insincerely sincere’ rhetoric by foregrounding a visual aesthetics of imperfection. We argue that these strategies play an important role not only in Shnurov’s biography but also in a broader story: that of sincere expression as a prime concern of twenty-first-century media and popular culture.
Contradictory and paradoxical, Schoenberg was responsible for explosively radical innovations in composition - including atonality and the twelve-tone method - that changed the face of music in the twentieth century. This volume explores Schoenberg's life, work and world, offering contributions from internationally recognized musicologists, music theorists, cultural historians, literary scholars and more. Chapters examine the different places where Schoenberg lived, his various approaches to composition, the people and institutions that shaped his life and work, and the big issues and ideas that informed his worldview, including religion, gender, technology and politics. This book is essential for students and educators but also accessible to a general audience interested in the intersections of music, modernity, society and culture, offering a variety of fresh, multi-disciplinary perspectives on Schoenberg and his richly variegated world.
Lesbian and gay liberation movements of the twentieth century were made possible through heterogeneous dance music cultures that flourished in urban spaces. In an era of profound political challenges, collective dance enabled lesbian and gay individuals to connect with their bodies and the bodies of others, experience a sense of communal belonging, explore non-normative gender and sexual desires, and perceive individual and collective power in a heteronormative reality that regularly suppressed both. For lesbians and gays, collective dance introduced them to difference as a dynamic catalyst of political change, allowing them to experience the promise of liberation. This Element combines ethnographic research, archival materials, and popular music histories to analyze the role of popular music participation in lesbian and gay liberation in US cities and demonstrate how collective dance served as a transformative site of political contestation and imagination. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.