Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T18:27:54.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Action valence and affective perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Walter Gerbino
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit “Gaetano Kanizsa,” University of Trieste, 34128 Trieste, Italy. gerbino@units.itcfantoni@units.ithttp://bit.ly/units_dsv_wghttp://bit.ly/units_dsv_cf
Carlo Fantoni
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Psychology Unit “Gaetano Kanizsa,” University of Trieste, 34128 Trieste, Italy. gerbino@units.itcfantoni@units.ithttp://bit.ly/units_dsv_wghttp://bit.ly/units_dsv_cf

Abstract

Respecting all constraints proposed by Firestone & Scholl (F&S), we have shown that perceived facial expressions of emotion depend on the congruency between bodily action (comfort/discomfort) and target emotion (happiness/anger) valence. Our studies challenge any bold claim against penetrability of perception and suggest that perceptual theory can benefit from demonstrations of how – under controlled circumstances – observer's states can mold expressive qualities.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsalou, L. W. (2010) Grounded cognition: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science 2:716–24.Google Scholar
Beale, J. M. & Keil, F. C. (1995) Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 57:217–39.Google Scholar
Fantoni, C. & Gerbino, W. (2014) Body actions change the appearance of facial expressions. PLoS ONE 9:e108211. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108211.Google Scholar
Fantoni, C., Rigutti, S. & Gerbino, W. (2016) Bodily action penetrates affective perception. PeerJ 4:e1677. doi:10.7717/peerj.1677.Google Scholar
Gerbino, W., Manzini, M., Rigutti, S. & Fantoni, C. (2014) Action molds the perception of facial expressions. Perception, ECVP Abstract Supplement 43:173.Google Scholar
Goldstone, R. L. & Hendrickson, A. T. (2010) Categorical perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1:6978.Google Scholar
Kiefer, M. & Barsalou, L. W. (2013) Grounding the human conceptual system in perception, action, and internal states. In: Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline, ed. Prinz, W., Beisert, M. & Herwig, A., pp. 381407. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1929) Gestalt psychology. Liveright.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1938) The place of value in a world of facts. Liveright.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (2011) Circularity, reliability, and the cognitive penetrability of perception. Philosophical Issues 21:289311.Google Scholar
Metzger, W. (1941) Psychologie. Steinkopff.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, P. M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M. & Hess, U. (2010) The Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:417–80.Google Scholar
Sinico, M. (2015) Tertiary qualities, from Galileo to Gestalt psychology. History of the Human Sciences 28:6879.Google Scholar
Toccafondi, F. (2009) Facts, values, emotions, and perception. In: Values and ontology: Problems and perspectives, ed. Centi, B. & Huemer, W., pp. 137–54. Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar