Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T05:06:42.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hallucinations and mental imagery demonstrate top-down effects on visual perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Piers D. L. Howe
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. pdhowe@unimelb.edu.au ocarter@unimelb.edu.au http://psych.unimelb.edu.au/people/piers-howe http://psych.unimelb.edu.au/people/olivia-carter
Olivia L. Carter
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. pdhowe@unimelb.edu.au ocarter@unimelb.edu.au http://psych.unimelb.edu.au/people/piers-howe http://psych.unimelb.edu.au/people/olivia-carter

Abstract

In this commentary, we present two examples where perception is not only influenced by, but also in fact driven by, top-down effects: hallucinations and mental imagery. Crucially, both examples avoid all six of the potential confounds that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) raised as arguments against previous studies claiming to demonstrate the influence of top-down effects on perception.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable