Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T22:13:50.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognition can affect perception: Restating the evidence of a top-down effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Daniel T. Levin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721; daniel.t.levin@vanderbilt.edu lewis.j.baker@vanderbilt.edu https://my.vanderbilt.edu/daniellevinlab/about-me/ https://my.vanderbilt.edu/lewisbaker/about-me/
Lewis J. Baker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5721; daniel.t.levin@vanderbilt.edu lewis.j.baker@vanderbilt.edu https://my.vanderbilt.edu/daniellevinlab/about-me/ https://my.vanderbilt.edu/lewisbaker/about-me/
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138. mahzarin_banaji@harvard.edu http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~banaji/

Abstract

We argue that Firestone & Scholl (F&S) provide worthwhile recommendations but that their critique of research by Levin and Banaji (2006) is unfounded. In addition, we argue that F&S apply unjustified level of skepticism about top-down effects relative to other broad hypotheses about the sources of perceptual intelligence.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable