Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-5qg8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T13:04:43.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An inclusive developmental science requires attention to neurodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2026

Morton Ann Gernsbacher Open the ORCID record for Morton Ann Gernsbacher [Opens in a new window] ,
Nameera Akhtar  and
Janette Dinishak Open the ORCID record for Janette Dinishak [Opens in a new window]
Morton Ann Gernsbacher*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA magernsb@wisc.edu
Nameera Akhtar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA nakhtar@ucsc.edu
Janette Dinishak
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA jdinisha@ucsc.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bard et al.’s WILD framework calls for cultural inclusivity in developmental science. We argue for extending this framework to neurodiversity, emphasizing equifinality and individual differences. Including neurodivergent populations enriches developmental theory and avoids harm caused by neurotypical benchmarks. A truly inclusive science must recognize developmental pathways that vary by culture and neurotype as valid and meaningful.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 49 , 2026 , e268
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akhtar, N., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2008). On privileging the role of gaze in infant social cognition. Child Development Perspectives, 2(2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00044.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600.10.1017/S0954579400007318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, M. (2024). Language development, linguistic input, and linguistic racism. WIREs Cognitive Science, 15(3), e1673. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1673 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gernsbacher, M. A., Stevenson, J. L., Khandakar, S., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2008). Why does joint attention look atypical in autism?. Child Development Perspectives, 2(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00039.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karasik, L. B., Adolph, K. E., Fernandes, S. N., Robinson, S. R., & Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. (2023). Gahvora cradling in Tajikistan: Cultural practices and associations with motor development. Child Development, 94(4), 1049–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13919 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed