As cases of resistance to herbicides escalate worldwide, there is increasingdemand from growers to test for weed resistance and learn how to manage it.Scientists have developed resistance-testing protocols for numerousherbicides and weed species. Growers need immediate answers and scientistsare faced with the daunting task of testing an increasingly large number ofsamples across a variety of species and herbicides. Quick tests have been,and continue to be, developed to address this need, although classical testsare still the norm. Newer methods involve molecular techniques. Whereas theclassical whole-plant assay tests for resistance regardless of themechanism, many quick tests are limited by specificity to an herbicide, modeof action, or mechanism of resistance. Advancing knowledge in weed biologyand genomics allows for refinements in sampling and testing protocols. Thus,approaches in resistance testing continue to diversify, which can confoundthe less experienced. We aim to help weed science practitioners resolvequestions pertaining to the testing of herbicide resistance, starting withfield surveys and sampling methods, herbicide screening methods, dataanalysis, and, finally, interpretation. More specifically, this articlediscusses approaches for sampling plants for resistance confirmation assays,provides brief overviews on the biological and statistical basis fordesigning and analyzing dose–response tests, and discusses alternativeprocedures for rapid resistance confirmation, including molecular-basedassays. Resistance confirmation procedures often need to be slightlymodified to suit a specific situation; thus, the general requirements aswell as pros and cons of quick assays and DNA-based assays are contrasted.Ultimately, weed resistance testing research, as well as resistancemanagement decisions arising from research, needs to be practical, feasible,and grounded in science-based methods.