Low fruit and vegetable (FV) intake is a public health concern in Malta, where more than one in four adults are living with obesity and only approximately 12% meet the recommended five-a-day intake (1). Socioeconomic disparities can contribute to a poor diet, with international evidence pointing to disadvantaged groups consuming fewer FV (2). The main aims of this local study were to assess FV intakes, perceptions and drivers including barriers, among adults residing in Malta.
This cross-sectional study used an anonymised, convenience sampling design with an online survey (via Google Forms) disseminated on social networks in April-June 2024. The questionnaire (33 items) covered demographics, FV consumption frequency, barriers and suggested improvements. Ethical approval was obtained from the University’s Faculty Research Ethics Committee (FREC ID: FHS-2023-00664). Chi-square tests (or Fisher- Freeman-Halton Exact tests) and Spearman’s correlations were utilised for analysis, and with cross-tabulations used for suggestions for increased consumption.
315 respondents returned the survey (mean age 44.5 years, range 18–65 years; 72% female) and with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.4 kg/m2 (SD= 5.66). Mean daily consumption was 1.7 and 1.8 FV portions respectively. Age was positively correlated with fruit intake (p=0.001), with older adults consuming fruit more frequently, but vegetable intake showed no significant correlation with age (p=0.39). Participants in lower income brackets were significantly more likely to report cost as a barrier to FV consumption (p=0.001) than those in higher-incomes. Comparing two districts with contrasting high and low-at-risk-of-poverty (ARP) rates classified according to 2022 statistics (National Statistics Office, NSO, 2023)(3), higher proportions of Northern Harbour respondents had higher incomes despite living in a higher ARP district, and reported earning over €50.1k annually (30.7%) compared to 21.9% in the South Eastern (low-ARP) district, whereas participants earning between €15.1–€20k were more represented in the South Eastern district (21.9%) than in Northern Harbour (1.8%). These income differences were significant (p=0.005). Suggested community improvements for FV access based on income levels revealed that a majority of lower-income participants looked for lower prices (55.6% in <€10k income bracket). In contrast, lower proportions of higher-income participants were concerned with cost (40.7% in >€50.1k bracket) and a quarter reported no community improvements needed. Cost was more frequently reported as a barrier to FV consumption (p<0.001) among non-EU participants (44.4%) and Maltese participants (41.3%) compared to other EU nationals (14.3%).
In conclusion, Maltese adults’ FV intakes fall short of dietary recommendations, and affordability barriers affect those in less affluent groups, reflecting socioeconomic barriers exist for FV consumption. There is a need to focus on targeted approaches such as providing subsidies for low-income pockets and different age groups within communities and different nationalities, regardless of district, in an effort to improve FV consumption in Malta.