To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In the second paper under this general title, it was shown how a theorem about the torus could be deduced by a limiting process from a theorem on finite abelian groups. The object of this paper is to prove a similar continuous analogue of H. B. Mann's (α+β)-theorem. It was found that the limiting process used in the second paper could not easily be modified to apply to the present problem, and an alternative method had to be found. The method is, roughly, to prove the result first for open sets satisfying certain conditions, then for closed sets by taking intersections of open sets, and finally for arbitrary measurable sets, since every measurable set contains a closed set of almost equal measure.
A C*-dynamical system is called topologically free if the action satisfies a certain natural condition weaker than freeness. It is shown that if a discrete system is topologically free then the ideal structure of the crossed product algebra is related to that of the original algebra. One consequence is that a minimal topologically free discrete system has a simple reduced crossed product. Sharper results are obtained when the algebra is abelian.
Conditions are given on two maximal monotone (multivalued) operators A and B which ensure that A + B is also maximal. One condition used is that ∥Bx∥≦k(∥x∥)Ax| +d|(A + B)x| + c(∥x∥) for every x∈D(A)⊆D(B), where 0≦k(r)<1, and c(r)≧0 are nondecreasing functions, and 0≦d≦1 is a constant. Here, for a set C, |C| denotes inf{∥y∥:y∈C}. This extends the well known result which has d = 0 (and is used in the proof here). The second part of the paper uses similar hypotheses to give conditions under which the range of the sum, R(A + B), has the same interior and same closure as the sum of the ranges, R(A) + R(B).
Very little information is now to be found regarding James Gray, the author of the famous Scottish Arithmetic, so universally in use in Scotland during the 19th century as to make his name synonymous for Arithmetic, just as Cocker's was England during the 18th century.
By analogy with the concept of “inverse semi-group” in semi-group theory, in this paper we introduce the concept of “generalized near-field” in near-rings. A near-ring N is called a generalized near-field (GNF) if for each a ε N there exists a unique b ε N such that a = aba and b = bab, that is (N, ·) is an inverse semi-group. Surprisingly, this concept in rings coincides with that of “strong regularity”. But this is not true in the case of near-rings. Every GNF is strongly regular, but in general the converse is not true.
the coefficients have been called by Professor Nielsen (following Thiele) the Stirling Numbers of the First Species, because James Stirling, in his Methodus Differentialis (1730), was the first writer to draw attention to their use, and furnished a small table of their initial values.
If we consider a semigroup, its algebraic structure may be such that it is isomorphic to a subsemigroup of a group, or is algebraically embeddable in a group. This problem was investigated in 1931 by Ore who obtained in (4) a set of necessary conditions for this embedding. A necessary condition is that the semigroup should be cancellative: for any a, x, y in the semigroup either xa = ya or ax = ay implies that x = y. Malcev in (3) showed that this was not sufficient. It is enough to note that his example was a non-commutative semigroup: a commutative cancellative semigroup is embeddable algebraically in a group.
The *-algebra A1 is defined to be the free unital *-algebra with one generator x. A *-ideal I of A1 is defined to be a C*-ideal if A1/I may be embedded into a C*-algebra. It is proved that if I is a *-ideal of A1 generated by polynomials in A1, then I is a C*-ideal. This is not true for general *-ideals of A1.
The authors together with M. J. Karbe [Ill. J. Math. 33 (1989) 333–359] have considered Fitting classes of -groups and, under some rather strong restrictions, obtained an existence and conjugacy theorem for -injectors. Results of Menegazzo and Newell show that these restrictions are, in fact, necessary.
The Fitting class is normal if, for each is the unique -injector of G. is abelian normal if, for each. For finite soluble groups these two concepts coincide but the class of Černikov-by-nilpotent -groups is an example of a nonabelian normal Fitting class of -groups. In all known examples in which -injectors exist is closely associated with some normal Fitting class (the Černikov-by-nilpotent groups arise from studying the locally nilpotent injectors).
Here we investigate normal Fitting classes further, paying particular attention to the distinctions between abelian and nonabelian normal Fitting classes. Products and intersections with (abelian) normal Fitting classes lead to further examples of Fitting classes satisfying the conditions of the existence and conjugacy theorem.
Given any subspace N of a Banach space X, there is a subspace M containing N and of the same density character as N, for which there exists a linear Hahn–Banach extension operator from M* to X*. This result was first proved by Heinrich and Mankiewicz [4, Proposition 3.4] using some of the deeper results of Model Theory. More precisely, they used the Banach space version of the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem due to Stern [11], which in turn relies on the Löwenheim–Skolem and Keisler–Shelah theorems from Model Theory. Previously Lindenstrauss [7], using a finite dimensional lemma and a compactness argument, obtained a version of this for reflexive spaces. We shall show that the same finite dimensional lemma leads directly to the general result, without any appeal to Model Theory.
Among the many semigroups which can be derived from a given compact (jointly continuous) semigroup S is the semigroup 2s consisting of its non-empty compact subsets; the product is the usual one defined by the rule EF = {xy:xεE, yεF}. The Vietoris or finite topology on 2s (in which a base for the open sets is obtained by taking all sets of the form for l ≦i ≦n} as Vl, V2,…, Vn run over all finite collections of open subsets of S) makes 2s a compact, jointly continuous semigroup. The topology has a long history, having been introduced by Vietoris in 1923 and studied by Michael[4]. The utility of the topological semigroup was established by Hofmann and Mostert [3; see especially Section 3.7]; in fact they prefer to produce directly the uniform structure on 2s rather than the topology.
A groupoid is a set closed with respect to a binary operation. It is commutative and entropic if xy = yx and xy.zw = xz.yw hold for all its elements. It is cyclic if it is generated by one element. Let x be the generator of the free commutative entropic cyclic groupoid . Then any element of can be written in the form xP where x1 = x and xQ+R = xQxR. Two indices P, Q are equal (called “concordant” in (3)) if and only if xP = xQ. The groupoid of these indices, the free additive commutative entropic logarithmetic (cf. (3)), is clearly isomorphic to .
Introducing the technique of subharmonic functions, we prove that the local spectrum Spu(λ)(T) is almost constant if u is an analytic family of vectors and if the spectrum of T is thin, a result which is similar to the finite-dimensional situation. We apply this result to improve a former result of C. Foiaş [7] on generalized scalar operators and results of C. Foiaş and F. -H. Vasilescu [8] on generalized commutators.