To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In an earlier paper (2) we considered the following question “If S is a cyclic subgroup of a finite group G and S ∩ F(G) = 1, where F(G) is the Fitting subgroup of G, does there necessarily exist a conjugate Sx of S in G with S ∩ Sx = l?” and we gave an affirmative answer for G simple or soluble. In this paper we answer the question affirmatively in general (in fact we prove a somewhat stronger result (Theorem 3)). We give an example of a group G with a cyclic subgroup S such that (i) no nontrivial subgroup of S is normal in G and (ii) no x exists for which S ∩ Sx = 1.
The following is an elementary discussion of certain propositions in solid geometry which are commonly left to a later stage.
Let ABCD be a quadrilateral formed of rods freely jointed, let points E, F, G, H be taken on AB, BC, CD, DA respectively and let EG, FH be joined by rods freely jointed to the former. Let us investigate whether the resulting framework is rigid.
In a recent paper Professor A. C. Aitken directed attention to a little known type of inverse factorial series, which he calls inverse central factorial series. He showed that this type of series is a very powerful means of asymptotic representation of functions of a certain type, and concluded his note with the-remark that there is here scope for considerable investigation. As a modest contribution to this investigation, the asymptotic theory, foreshadowed in the last paragraph of Aitken's paper, will be given here: it is hoped to give the convergence theory of inverse central factorial series later.
In some chemical reaction–diffusion processes, the reaction takes place only at some local sites, due to the presence of a catalyst. In this paper we study the well-posedness of a model problem of this type. Sufficient conditions are found to ensure global existence and finite time blowup. The blowup rate and the blowup set are also investigated in the case of special nonlinearity.
Most lecturers on Analytical Statics only consider the following catenaries: the common catenary, the parabolic catenary of the suspension bridge, and, less frequently, the catenary of uniform strength. Of these the second only represents the form of the suspension bridge chain when the weight of the chain is neglected in comparison with that of the roadway, while the first represents the opposite extreme when the weight of the chain alone is taken into account.
In [3] Laffey has shown that if Z is a cyclic subgroup of a finite subgroup G, then either a nontrivial subgroup of Z is normal in the Fitting subgroup F(G) or there exists a g in G such that Zg∩Z = 1. In this note we offer a simple proof of the following generalisation of that result:
Theorem. Let G be a finite group and X and Y cyclic subgroups of G. Then there exists a g in G such that Xg∩Y⊴F(G).
In each metric space (X, d) there is defined the space Lip X of complex-valued, bounded, and uniformly Lipschitzian functions. In the algebra Lip X, it is natural to ask for ideals closed in various notions of convergence, and also to identify the invertible elements. In particular, are the invertible elements exactly those with no zero in X? Wiener's Tauberian Theorem in Fourier analysis is the first and most remarkable example of this harmonious state of affairs. A moment's reflection confirms that, for the algebra Lip X, this is true only for compact metric spaces X, the trivial examples in our investigation. We therefore introduce a type of convergence weaker than convergence in norm; it has already proved useful in some problems in descriptive set theory and reflects in a subtle way the metric properties of X. A sequence (fn) in Lip X converges strongly to g, written s – limfn=g, if ∥fn∥≦C in the Banach space Lip X and lim fn(x)=g(x) for each element x of X. In Section 3 we explain how this is really a type of convergence in the dual space of a certain Banach space . This brings us to the edge of some recondite questions about iterated (or even transfinite) limits, and we have adhered to the notion of strong limits to avoid these questions. To illustrate the differences between these two approaches, we mention this problem: which maximal ideals of Lip X are closed with respect to strong convergence of sequences? This is not the problem studied in Section 1.
The object of the present note is to obtain a number of infinite integrals involving Struve functions and parabolic cylinder functions. 1. G. N. Watson(1) has proved that
From (1)
follows provided that the integral is convergent and term-by-term integration is permissible. A great many interesting particular cases of (2) are easily deducible: the following will be used in this paper.
We construct a family of hyperbolic 3-manifolds whose fundamental groups admit a cyclic presentation. We prove that all these manifolds are cyclic branched coverings of S3 over the knot 52 and we compute their homology groups. Moreover, we show that thecyclic presentations correspond to spines of the manifolds.
The course of geometry here referred to was given to pupils in George Heriot's School in the session preceding that in which they should begin the usual systematic study of geometry. The chief object of the course was to furnish their minds with a number of geometrical ideas before they should meet with these ideas as treated by Euclid. Subsidiary ends were also kept in view—such as to get them to make neat and accurate figures, and to enable them to solve various practical problems of construction and measurement.