To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In a paper entitled “Sets of anticommuting matrices” Eddington proved that if El, E2, …., Eqform a set of q four-rowed square matrices satisfying the relations,
,
where E is the unit matrix, then the maximum value of q is five. Later Newman showed that this result is a particular case of the general theorem that ifE1, E2, …., Eqform a set of q t-rowed square matrices satisfying (1), where t = 2Pτ and τ is odd, then the maximum value of q is 2p + 1.
Let G be a group and let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p>0. The twisted group algebra Kt(G) of G over K is defined as follows: let G have elements a, b, c, … and let Kt(G) be a vector space over K with basis elements , …; a multiplication is defined on this basis of Kt(G) and extended by linearity to Kt(G) by letting
where α(x, y) is a non-zero element of K, subject to the condition that
which is both necessary and sufficient for associativity. If, for all x, y ∈ G, α{x, y) is the identity of K then Kt(G) is the usual group algebra K(G) of G over K. We denote the Jacobson radical of Kt(G) by JKt(G). We are interested in the relationship between JKt(G) and JKt(H) where H is a normal subgroup of G. In § 2 we show, among other results, that if certain centralising conditions are satisfied and if JK(H) is locally nilpotent then JK(H)K(G) is also locally nilpotent and thus contained in JK(G). It is observed that in the absence of some centralising conditions these conclusions are false. We show, in particular, that if H and G/C(H) are locally finite, C(H) being the centraliser of H, and if G/H has no non-trivial elements of order p, then JK(G) coincides with the locally nilpotent ideal JK(H)K(G). The latter, and probably more significant, part of this paper is concerned with particular types of groups. We introduce the notion of a restricted SN-group and show that if G is such a group and ifG has no non-trivial elements of order p then JKt(G) = {0}. It is also shown that if G is polycyclic then JKt(G) is nilpotent.
In [3], [8], and [2], it was shown that if is an essentially Hermitian operator on l P, 1≦ p<∞, or on Lp[0,1], 1< p<∞, then T is a compact perturbation of a Hermitian operator. In [1], this result was established for operators on Orlicz sequence space l M, where 2∉[α M,β M] (the associated interval for M). In that same paper, it was conjectured that this result does not in general hold if 2∈[α M,β M]. In this paper, we show that this conjecture is correct by exhibiting an Orlicz sequence space l M and an essentially Hermitian operator on l M which is not a compact perturbation of a Hermitian operator.
Writing of his now well-known Interpolation Formula, Professor Everett said, “The only novelty in the formula is the simplicity of its form.… The best known formulae for interpolation by central differences are difficult to carry in the memory on account of their unsymmetrical aspect, one law being applicable to the odd and another to the even terms. … This disadvantage does not apply to the formula proposed,” viz., that which now goes by Everett's name.
In (2) Hickin and Phillips establish various results connecting the ideas of local systems and serial subgroups in group theory. In (4) Petty shows that if a group has a local factor system of -groups, then it may be embedded in an ultraproduct of -groups and he uses this result to extend some local theorems which were originally due to Mal'cev (3) and at the same time providing an elementary proof. We shall show that Petty's method may be used to prove results about seriality and local systems.
Einstein has recently adopted a new set of field-equations in his Unified Field-Theory of Gravitation and Electricity, the so-called theory of parallelism at a distance or Teleparallelism, and has given a solution of these equations with spherical symmetry, corresponding to the field of a charged mass-particle. In the present paper we discuss the solution of these equations with axial symmetry, which corresponds to a statical field whose field-variables depend on a single coordinate only, viz. the coordinate which is measured along the axis of symmetry.
A bounded linear operator T on a complex reflexive Banach space is said to be well-bounded if it is possible to choose a compact interval J = [a, b] and a positive constant M such that
for every complex polynomial p, where ‖p‖J denotes sup {|p(t)|:t ∈ J}. Such operators were introduced and first studied by Smart (4). They are of interest principally because they admit (and in fact are characterised by) an integral representation similar to, but in general weaker than, the integral representation of a self-adjoint operator on a Hilbert space. (See (2) and (4) for details.) It is easily seen, by verifying (1) directly, that T is well-bounded if it is a scalar-type spectral operator with real spectrum.
The object of this note is to draw attention to a simple extension of a well-known theorem concerning corresponding points on confocal ellipsoids–an extension which seems to have escaped notice. It has been familiar to me for years as an illustration of the quaternion treatment.
This note is intended to be supplementary to the paper, by Mr Muirhead, on “The dissection of any two triangles into mutually similar pairs of triangles.” The constructions given there, for the general case of this problem, yield no real solution if one angle of one triangle be greater than the sum of any two angles of the other triangle. For this particular case, the following constructions supply the necessary requirements; the first leads to a division of the triangles into three parts, the second to a division into four parts.
Let A be a finite-dimensional Bernstein algebra over a field K with characteristic not 2. Maximal subalgebras of A are studied, and they are determined if A is a genetic algebra. It is also proved that the intersection of all maximal subalgebras of A (the Frattini subalgebra of A) is always an ideal. Finally the structure of Bernstein algebras with Frattini subalgebra equal to zero is described.
§1. The general theorem underlying the subject of this paper is as follows:—
If through c1, c2, c3, … points on AB, a side of ΔABC, rays be drawn from two vertices O1, O2, the former meeting AC in b1, b2b3, …, and the latter meeting BC in a1, a2, a3, …, then the lines a1b2, a2b2, … envelope a conic touching the sides AC and BC. This follows since the ranges a1a2a3 …, b1b2b3 …, are homographic.