To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
One of the ways to describe a matroid M(E) in Chapter 2 was by means of a closure operator cl on the set of subsets of E. This closure operator distinguishes a closed set or flat of the matroid M(E) as a set T ⊂ E with the property T = cl(T). In this chapter we want to study the collection L(M) of flats of M(E) and find out how much of the structure of M(E) is reflected in the structure of L(M).
L(M) is (partially) ordered by set-theoretic inclusion. Furthermore, there are two natural binary operations on L(M): For every pair T1, T2 of flats of M(E) define T1 ∨ T2 as the smallest flat containing both T1 and T2, and T1 ∧ T2 as the largest flat contained in both T1 and T2. [It is not difficult to see that these operations are well defined. In fact, T1 ∨ T2 = cl(T1 ∪ T2), and T1 ∧ T2 = T1 ∩ T2.]
The appropriate setting for study of this algebraic structure on L(M) is lattice theory. So we shall briefly introduce the concept of a lattice and then proceed to investigate special classes of lattices. The guiding example thereby is the lattice of subspaces of a finite-dimensional vector space. Such a lattice is, in particular, modular. Hence, we shall look at the concept of modularity in a lattice, with special emphasis on the notion of a modular pair of elements.
In [8,9] Jayne and Rogers studied piece-wise closed maps and ℱσ maps between metric spaces. A map f of a metric space X into a metric space Y is said to be an ℱσ map if: (a) f maps ℱσ-sets in X to ℱσ-sets in Y; and (b) f1 maps ℱσ-sets in Y back to ℱσ-sets in X. A map fof a metric space X into a metric space Y is said to be piece-wise closed if:it is possible to find a sequence X1, X2,… of closed sets in X, with with each setf(Xi), i ≥ 1, closed in Y, and with the restriction offto each Xi, a closed map (i.e., a continuous map that maps closed sets to closed sets).
If E is a subset of ℝn (n ≥ 1) we define the distance set of E as
The best known result on distance sets is due to Steinhaus [11], namely, that, if E ⊂ ℝn is measurable with positive n-dimensional Lebesgue measure, then D(E) contains an interval [0, ε) for some ε > 0. A number of variations of this have been examined, see Falconer [6, p. 108] and the references cited therein.
Suppose that θ is a positive irrational number and α is an arbitrary real number. Then Kronecker's Theorem in diophantine approximation (Theorem 440 of [7[) can be stated as follows.
For d, n positive integers, let α(d, n) be the statement “For every abelian variety A bounded by d there exists a point P of order n”. Let l1, l2, l3, … be the sequence of prime numbers and let α be
We use the Buchstab-Rosser sieve to derive an asymptotic formula for the distribution of those integers n for which the r numbers n + l1, n + l2,…, n + lr are all square-free. Our error estimate sharpens a similar result of Hall and is uniform in both r and maxl 1≤i≤r|li|.
in p-adic fields. Davenport and Lewis showed that the equations have a non-trivial solution in every p-adic field, if n ≥ 16, and need not have a solution in the 7-adic field, if n = 15. Here we prove that if p ≠ 7 the equations have a non-trivial solution in p-adic fields if n ≥ 13. When n = 12 such a result fails for every prime p ≡ 1 (mod 3).
This paper considers the flow of a dissipative fluid in a radial bearing. By looking at the equations in the thermal boundary layer it is shown that, if a certain parameter m is less than unity, then the temperature in the boundary layer is bounded for all time.
Le point de départ de ce travail est le résultat suivant.
THÉORÈME (I. Namioka). Soient X et Y deux espaces compacts et
Si f est continue quand on munit(Y) de la topologie de convergence simple alors X contient un Gδ dense en tout point duquel f reste continue quand on munit(Y) de la topologie de la convergence uniform.
In 1959 C. A. Rogers gave the following estimate for the density ϑ(k) of lattice-coverings of euclidean d-space Ed with convex bodies . Here, c is a suitable constant which does not depend on d and K. Moreover, Rogers proved that for the unit ball Bd the upper bound can be replaced by , which is, of course a major improvement. In the present paper we show that such an improvement can be obtained for a larger class of convex bodies. In particular, we prove the following theorem. Let K be a convex body in Ed, and let k be an integer satisfying k > log2 loge d + 4. If there exist at least k hyperplanes H1,…, Hk with normals mutually perpendicular and an affine transformation A such that A(K) is symmetrical with respect to Hl,…,Hk, respectively, then . Actually, for a bound of this type we do not even need any symmetry assumption. In fact, some weaker properties concerning shadow boundaries will suffice.
In our paper [12[ we made extensive use of the details of the proofs given in our earlier paper [11], and, in particular, we claimed that Lemma 3 of [11] holds, not just when Y is a metric space, but also when Y is a Hausdorff space, provided X × Y is a Fréchet space. In a corrigendum to [11], we give a corrected version of this Lemma 3, but it seems to depend, in an essential way, on the assumption that Y is a metric space, or at least a perfectly normal space. In this note we show that a modified version of this Lemma 3 enables us to justify all the theorems in [12] by use of a modified method of selection.
Let be a finitely generated subgroup of SL (2, ℱ), where ℱ is the ring; of holomorphic functions on the open unit disc Δ. For each point z0 in Δ we can evaluate all matrix entries of at z0, to obtain a subgroup {z0} of SL (2, ℂ) and a surjective representation → {z0}. If this representation is not faithful, then contains a nontrivial element W such that W evaluated; at z0 is trivial. But W can evaluate to the identity only on a countable subset) of Δ, and there are only countably many choices for W in Consequently there are at most countably many points zk in Δ such that {zk} is not isomorphic to Δ. Our main result can now be stated as follows.
If E1 and E2 are subsets of ℝn and a- is an isometry or similarity transformation, it is useful to be able to estimate the Hausdorff dimension of E1 ∩ σ(E2) in terms of the dimensions of E1 and E2. If E1 and E2 are compact, then, as σvaries, dim (El ∩ σ(E2)) is “in general” at most max (dim E1 + dim E2 − n, 0) and “often” at least this value (see Mattila [9] and Kahane [7] for more precise statements of these ideas). However, as we shall see, it is possible to construct non-compact sets E of any given dimension that are “sufficiently dense” in ℝn to ensure that dim (E ∩ σ(E)) = dim E for all similarities σ More generally, we shall show that for each s there are large classes of sets & of dimensions between s and n, closed under reasonable transformations including similarities, such that the intersection of any countable collection of sets in & has dimension at least s. Such collections of sets are required, for example, in the constructions of subsets of ℝn with certain dimensional properties given by Davies [1] and Falconer [5].